Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:hyperloop without the hyper or loop (Score 1) 165

Uh, the Jetta TDI gets 62mpg in practice (someone did a 5,000+-mile trip going counterclockwise, west across the northern U.S. and then east along the southern U.S), while its gasoline counterpart boasts 32mpg on the highway and 27mpg in the city.

In most of the U.S., you need ULSD. Here on the east coast, gasoline costs $1.55 now and diesel is going for $1.75. A 300 mile tank on my Mazda 3S with the 2.4L (averaging a good 25-28mpg) costs $18 now; a few months back it was still around $25, when gas was $1.92. Surprising me with these low fuel prices.

BTW: At CA electricity and gas prices you're claiming that a 100% efficient Tesla, consuming only 62MJ of electricity, will make that trip, but a gasoline powered car would require 1180MJ to make the same trip. That is a 5% fuel-to-travel efficiency, not the 14-30% [fueleconomy.gov] that is known.

Yes but California is a lunatic state. See also: Texas, where some cities have electricity for under 5 cents per kWh.

Comment Re:File a Complaint (Score 1) 82

Try speaking back to them in a drawn Indian accent, and then tell them it sounds like they may have a virus and you'll need to check their Internet History Report. Then start talking about how their computer appears to be distributing large amounts of child pornography, including child bestiality, and that you think they've been receiving bitcoins from a source infected with the Win32-dot-Zika computer virus.

Comment Re:hyperloop without the hyper or loop (Score 5, Insightful) 165

A ground-level, rail-mounted tube doesn't expend energy holding itself against gravity, and faces less wind resistance than an airplane in orbit. That means operating the hyperloop would require less total energy expenditure than operating an air plane.

The Tesla car has higher instantaneous torque and a flat torque curve. The cost for me to drive 300 miles on gasoline is around $25 now; on biofuel, it's around $35; on diesel, it's around $12; on electricity, it's $3. Battery storage loses less energy in conversion than biofuel chemical storage. Electric cars are less complex and require less maintenance than reciprocating piston engines. Superior power, performance, durability, longevity, and cost doesn't seem inferior.

Comment Re:Other side of the airtight hatchway (Score 2) 115

Actually, you only have to insert it into the current working directory. For example: Get a dll file downloaded into Downloads, then wait for the user to run Setup.exe and have UAC hand it admin privileges. Now your non-privileged process has put a DLL file in the Downloads directory *with* Setup.exe, which loaded Downloads\CommDlg32.dll and was granted Administrator access. Now you have admin access.

Microsoft Word used to do this if you had a DLL file with the same name as a System32 DLL in the same path as a Word document.

Comment Re:Alternate title (Score 1) 110

So you are stating in a story that a free internet meant to be given to the poor, from a For Profit Company, however being blocked by the government because it has interests in keeping the underclass out of power, and probably have ties with other telecom companies, to block competition because they are offer lower price as a key competitive advantage. Is showing the evils of capitalism. Where in this case free market is motivated to provide free infrastructure in order to increase revenue from services offered.

Stop over simplifying things. Unregulated capitalism is bad, Over regulated capitalism is just as bad too. The details is important, not the political stance.

Comment Re:You are so right .. (Score 1) 102

This is more like fad economics (Furby) than anything else. They're buying time, not product: they want this particular thing, and they want it now, thus they're paying to have it now. This is slightly different from things like superbowl tickets (you won't get Superbowl 50 tickets next year; the supply is time- and space-limited) or Roman coins (you can get them any time, but there are only so many in existence).

I have a theory of scarcity which covers that human labor time produces all things, but things don't scale infinitely. The easiest example is food. When you run out of arable land, you start using more fertilizer and irrigation for smaller yields. Each 100,000 more people added to your population requires 2,000 working to make food until then; after that, you add 100,000 more and find you need 10,000 working to make food to feed these new people. You of course have to pay the wages of those 10,000 people (in most basic terms, they must at least have the means to survive); and, in societal wealth terms, you're short 8,000 people working to make other things, so now there are slightly less products (cars, running water, coats, iPhones) available per person, and so society becomes more poor (this mechanism creates scarcity pressure to slow population expansion).

It works the other way, too: the familiar economy-of-scale descends from fixed costs. To stand up a new fabrication facility, I'd need hundreds of millions of dollars; if my target market is small, Intel can fabricate the chips cheaper than I can, as they have existing capacity. Small markets with low demand, thus, experience high prices. (Subjective Theory of Value explains this by saying people pay what they perceive to be the correct price, and handwaves away market influences; it was created to explain why diamonds are so expensive if they're so plentiful.)

In context, we basically have low-demand scarcity: competitors aren't sure of the demand in this market and don't know if they can compete with a clone device. They *do* know the cost to start manufacture and the cost to market the new device would make it initially more expensive, as well as risky. Thus they currently see a low-demand market where they're not 100% certain of profitability and can't enter with low prices intending to catch up on the initial cost and turn a profit after shipping several million units. It's between apartment markets and semiconductor markets in nature.

As I said in the beginning: this is a temporary situation, and the people paying high prices are trying to buy a non-scarce product before its production is rolled out. This is a product which we can foresee a high supply of--give it a few months, most likely--yet people want it now. Fad economics. Wait a few months and you can buy all the Furbies you want.

Comment Re:Nice non-sequiteur at the end (Score 1) 102

All the other vendors died because McDonalds has a high supply to meet demand. You assert Raspberry Pi has a low supply, and the demand is not available for higher-priced alternatives. Sounds like a natural market to me: people decide they need X, they can get X for a price, and they don't value X *now* more than X *later* so they wait for supply to flow in at the lowest price.

Do you want $5 today or $10 in 6 weeks?

Comment Re:Density is nice, but what about longevity? (Score 2) 156

Samsung Evo 840 is rated for a 28-year life span at 10GB of data write per day. That's about 100TB written. According to some tests, the 840 starts experiencing sector relocations (bad NAND) around 100TB; somewhere about 9 times that, it suddenly fails without warning.

If you're constantly buffering HD video at 11GB/hr, that should give you 378 days to 100TB and maybe 9 years to sudden catastrophic failure.

Comment Re:I can understand small first batches (Score 1) 102

It's even bad as an Arduino replacement. The Arduino is a microcontroller with no high-latency general-purpose computing paths; the Pi has system buses and a memory management unit. Where the Arduino can just go straight to hardware and RAM, the Pi has to dawdle around waiting for interrupts and timing systems to give access to devices, and has to wait for row precharges and other operations before it can access memory. A 10uS operation becomes a 2mS operation because of a memory stall.

Comment Re:That isn't trustful. (Score 1) 553

No they are stuck in the 1990s
Their rant about Linux is the same argument that was true back in the mid 1990s however Linux has matured sense then.
Some of the biggest business problems they face can be far easier fixed with a partial adoption of Linux.

I am not an open source zealot. But in terms of control, and configurability Linux is superior to Windows. That comment was to try to silence a flood of just to switch to Linux posts.

Comment Pity there isn't a -1 ; Conspiracy Theory mod (Score 5, Insightful) 242

Slashdot needs ones. Seriously, for a community that claims to hate FUD, the OSS types sure like spreading it when it is about the "right" groups. If you actually care about what kinds of things the telemetry communicates back at various settings, the information is all out there for you. No, SSH data isn't one of them. However I am going to imagine you don't, and this is just crap you want to fling at "the bad guys" because you can.

Also a thought for you: Your OS, by definition, has access to anything any program on the system is doing. What would stop it from looking in at any 3rd party SSH server you ran, if you think it does that?

Slashdot Top Deals

Money cannot buy love, nor even friendship.

Working...