In a very real sense, she is a preacher of hate. Some people take exception to that to the point of losing rationality. On the other hand, lets wait and see whether her story actually pans out. This may still be a publicity stunt, and it actually has all the characteristics of one.
You are overlooking the question of consistency of your chosen axioms with reality. That is very much a part of rationality. In fact, it is the basis. Deriving things from axioms is just a tool that usually comes in handy and is required in basically all practical applications of rationality, but it is not strictly necessary if you get axiom consistency with reality in some other way (which is not practical, hence reasoning is usually regarded as a part of rationality).
Sorry, but all mathematics and all theory, including the scientific method are "discovered". They cannot be "invented". Read up on the philosophical basics if you do not believe that.
This may be fake. We only have her word. And we know that she has gotten a lot less attention lately than she wants...
Well, AC, you are just as stupid as ever. It took a century or more of baby-steps to get there, not counting about 3000 years of fundamental mathematical research.
You are a moron. Calling it a thing it is not is a very anti-science thing to do. Really, how stupid can you get?
Bullshit. No concept of god is required, not even a negative one. You can derive that if the scientific method works then there is no god, but that goes the other way round. You can also not prove that the scientific method works, you can just observe it. Why do people always screw up implications?
I am pretty sure you are wrong, and not only because the scientific method has always existed and will always exist. It is "discovery", not "invention".
Always the same crappy non-journalism. There is not going to be any silver bullets or any miracle-material. Have people learned nothing?
It is not. The philosophical underpinning was reverse-engineered from observing that some meta-approaches work better than others. The scientific method is _not_ a research result from philosophy. Its description, on the other hand, is.
As to the "rule of law" in feudalism, look up "l'etat, c'est moi".
Did you miss the part where this bill is just one step in a certain direction?
Current elites are hard at work to get back to that state.
The "rule of law" is badly broken, have you noticed? It is basically a corrupt bureaucracy that serves to enforce whatever those in power want. You are also completely wrong about civilization.