Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


Comment: Re:Yes we're going to keep using FTDI chips (Score 1) 572

by gweeks (#48221441) Attached to: FTDI Removes Driver From Windows Update That Bricked Cloned Chips

By "pissed" I mean we would charge them with the costs of removing all of the hardware from the field and doing the board reworks. You don't get these kinds of guarantees at the hobby level, but you do at the higher end. We've never had to do it for "clones" but we have for parts that didn't meet spec in other ways. I might be a little bit ticked at FTDI, but none of our stuff ever touches windows anyway.

Comment: Yes we're going to keep using FTDI chips (Score 3, Interesting) 572

by gweeks (#48220313) Attached to: FTDI Removes Driver From Windows Update That Bricked Cloned Chips

We don't use any of the serial only chips, but on the higher end with JTAG and SPI the FTDI parts work great and aren't too expensive. If any "clone" chips get into our supply chain we would be very pissed at whoever did it. We specify actual FDTI parts for a reason. The "clones" have very hit or miss quality. We don't use them under windows either.

Comment: More likely an IPS (Score 4, Informative) 572

by gweeks (#46410167) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: Does Your Employer Perform HTTPS MITM Attacks On Employees?

It's more likely they are running the traffic through and IDS/IPS rather than logging everything. It's also likely that well know banking sites are excluded and just passed through. It does use quite a lot of resources to scan the traffic after all.

IDS/IPS https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

Comment: Re:Waiting for free digital copies with book purch (Score 2) 259

by gweeks (#35202606) Attached to: E-Book Lending Stands Up To Corporate Mongering

Look for the Baen hard covers that include a CD. They don't charge any more for them and you get a digital copy of that book and many more on the CD. Now if only other publishers followed the example. Oh, and Baen doesn't believe in DRM for any of their books.


Comment: Old ads. (Score 3, Informative) 226

by gweeks (#33313008) Attached to: Will Amazon Put Advertisements In eBooks?

Books have had advertisements in them for a long time. Magazines too. Usually the book advertisements were for more books, but the advertisements in magazines could be for anything.

A guitar lessons ad from a 1930 Astounding Stories.

Comment: Thomas Jefferson's perspective (Score 1) 386

by gweeks (#31788714) Attached to: The Economist Weighs In For Shorter Copyright Terms

He who receives an idea from me, receives instruction himself without
lessening mine; as he who lights his taper at mine, receives light without
darkening me. That ideas should freely spread from one to another over the
globe, for the moral and mutual instruction of man, and improvement of his
condition, seems to have been peculiarly and benevolently designed by
nature, when she made them, like fire, expansible over all space, without
lessening their density in any point, and like the air in which we breathe,
move, and have our physical being, incapable of confinement or exclusive

Thomas Jefferson

He was talking specifically about patents, but the idea is still relevant for copyright.

Comment: Estimated actual damages (Score 5, Insightful) 229

by gweeks (#30945164) Attached to: RIAA Confusion In Tenenbaum & Thomas Cases?

Estimated actual damages

24 songs with a $.99 retail value. Assume the $.99 is the damage per song that a sale was lost on. (That's not the case actually as the wholesale price is the damage amount.) Assume every song downloaded is an actual lost sale. (Again not true, but simple for this calculation.) Assume a seed ration of 5, so for every song 5 copies were made. (Again not true, 5 is an insanely high ratio on P2P networks as 1:1 is common.) 24*.99.*5 = $118.80 actual losses incurred. 10 times that is the constitutionally recognized limit.


That's why RIAA doesn't want the constitutionality of the damages award adjudicated.

After Goliath's defeat, giants ceased to command respect. - Freeman Dyson