Just saying, watson is already doing oncology: http://www.mdanderson.org/newsroom/news-releases/2013/ibm-watson-to-power-moon-shots-.html and http://www.gizmag.com/watson-ibm-sloan-kettering-oncology-diagnosis-treatment/26285/
It would have been really cool (and morbid) if it did show every road death on earth, but all it does is provide aggregate numbers for most countries and presumably for just some recent period of time (in the past few years or so). This is a completely misleading slashdot subject line.... damn moderators.
There is a senior developer submitting a Ask Slashdot article about what to do with a know-it-all junior developer wasting time "refactoring" all of his code.
.... you are new to Linux, and you need some help?
Wouldn't it help Apple...? No.
Apple is trying to push for an injunction barring Samsung from selling its products at all. I.e. kill Samsung sales totally. Apple has claimed that the value of it's patents is so great, or impossible to calculate, and the only possible remedy for Samsung's infringement is to stop sales entirely. Apple has claimed that it is not possible for Samsung to pay license fees for the patents.
But now, it would appear that HTC *has* licensed (at least some of) the patents, so Samsung is claiming that it *is* possible to put a value to the patents, and thus a full injunction is not necessary, because a financial solution can be found.
That is why it sucks for Apple... because, if the court agrees with Samsung, Apple a) won't be able to stop samsung sales b) will be shown to be lying about licensing
Having read the entire order (and having followed this case from near the beginning), all I can say is that I *wish* that all orders were so well prepared and presented. It appears to close all avenues for appeals, and I think the best 'showing' of any parties to this case has been Judge Alsup. He kept control of a tough case, and in my opinion, all his rulings have been well thought out, and his 'go-the-extra-mile' attitude has made this process a clear win for all (except Oracle).
Hmmm... Thursday last week till today... that's a about 30 minutes according to Oracle's 'simulations'
Here's a reference:
search for "umbilical anaemia"
... for both our kids. We decided to 'donate' the cord blood (was free, and then you get 'preferential' access later if you happen to need some from the 'bank' later).
Turns out our kids were both born on Sunday evenings, and they do not collect blood on Sundays.....
Now I read all sorts of things about keeping the umbilical cord 'whole' for longer helps with anaemia... i.e. letting the cord 'drain' for longer is better for the baby. There's debate about how long the draining should take, but, it precludes the donation of the core blood.
If I were to be doing it again (and I'm not planning to...), I would talk with the O/B and delay the cutting of the cord for a few more minutes, and then forgo the donation of the blood entirely.
The prospects of tangible short-term benefits far outweighs the unlikely need for obscure treatments at some uncertain point in the future from some company that may or may not be around when you need them, and they may or may not have destroyed your tissues anyway, for a condition that may (at that time) be curable without cord blood anyway.
Sales taxes, income taxes, property taxes, capital gains taxes, etc.
Also, given that I think most of those taxes are far too high, I should answer 95%
The question is not 'how much of what I already pay should go to space exploration?', but rather: 'how much is wasted elsewhere....?'
And, % measures are worse than useless.
Meh, missing option : Continuously.
Everything is mirrored. The mirror has a snapshot every hour on the hour. The snapshots are ALL backed up to external drives.
Telemarketing Call Center... has to be right down there on the *worst* jobs...
FFS, people, when will it be understood that Hemp is much more than just Cannabis? Honestly, folk... 'concluding' that the car is made of Cannabis when it's described as a 'hemp' car is like concluding a person is a heroine user when they say they took some drugs... (even if it was a headache pill).
Feel like I'm complaining about a poll with a missing option, but, honestly
If you didn't know that, then I wonder whether you are as geeky as you think you are.....
Silicon junctions (transistors, diodes, more), batteries, and fluorescent lamp's do not obey 'ohm's law'.... Ohm's law is the observable property of some conductors, it's not a law.
if you got that one wrong, I would hesitate on going further.