These types of studies have been debunked.
I've been using Google hangouts on my iPad as my sole phone for months now. I get incoming calls on my Google Voice number.
But, as you freely admit, your math is influenced by $$$.
Wow, you are a complete Lovins acolyte. How does it feel to be only out for your own gain while ignoring the needs of the planet?
Keep drawing that paycheck.
You're ignoring capacity factor.
Yes, he also advocates for nuclear power. Hansen is awesome.
The point is that hydro is being reduced because of drought. I think you're losing track of which conversation you're having.
What about nuclear?
What math are you trolling about? You can't be bothered to provide specifics? Is that because you don't have any?
That's installed capacity. How much was actually generated?
Except at night.
What about gigawatt hours?
Plainly you're just a cheerleader with no hard facts to back up your faith in renewables. Os it your job to proselytize? Given your handle one has to wonder.
You've missed actually providing a number. With a handle like mdsolar shouldn't you know?
Hydro replaced by solar? Jesus. Here are some facts. Please rely on them instead of fairy tales.
Math is meaningless when based on faulty assumptions. One comment on that article is spot on: The 18% of electricity generated from hydro power is being impacted greatly by the drought in California. What's replacing it? Natural gas. So your monumental naiveté is playing right into the hands of fossil fuel interests.
You're touting math, but all you have is fairy dust assumptions. Try living in the real world.