Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Shorter answer (Score 1) 121

But that's a terrible analogy - aside for having no cars at all in it, most people win this lottery. When you have say, 20% saying "the system is rigged, it's all a scam", 60% working and content, and 20% saying "this sucks, but it's my own fault", it's hard to justify the first group.

It's equally hard to justify saying "it's their own damn fault" when such a large number of people are falling into the first and third categories.

Look, when I was young the single biggest thing keeping me down was the idea that a regular full-time job was some sort of scam, and it was only once I got over that that my life went anywhere.

Well, I thought that way twenty years ago, and I still think that way, and I'm still mostly a success. It's just that now I see more clearly how the powerful and influential wield their power - when I was young I never had such depth of thought. So, I decided that I'd simply try to become one of "them", and that's working out quite well :)

I see a lot of people who expected to just walk into a middle-class lifestyle straight out of college, and who are upset there's no "good" job waiting for them.

I haven't seen that in the last ten years; my perception matches just about everyone else who replied to you. To whit, there are no jobs, except for a few lucky enough to be connected (where I am unemployment is around the 25% mark, with you unemployment closer to 60%. A full 80% of graduating high-schoolers don't get jobs immediately after finishing school, thus they cannot finance themselves into a college.

It doesn't work that way - but that doesn't mean the "good" job doesn't exist, just that college didn't get you there, there are more steps to take first.

Look, I come from a poor background (think typical African township, with poultry flapping around when cars backfire and children running barefoot in dirt roads). When I left high-school I was lucky enough to get a job in a textile factory (working 7 nights a week, from 19h00 to 07h00) for around $20 USD a week. The only way to survive was to continue living with my parents. I used the income from that job to embark on a correspondence study course, and after the first year of computer science and maths was lucky enough to be hired at the local university. From there on in I just jumped from job to job every five years or so, upgrading each time.

However, I acknowledge that I was lucky to get that first job. Many of my mates from high-school only got jobs years later (some never - they did the best they could growing vegetables and whatnot). Had I not gotten lucky with that first factory job then I wouldn't have been here today typing this and trying to convince you that, no, it's not just your mindset, it's mostly luck when you're young. When there are 200 qualified applicants for 2 positions, then it merely comes down to who gets lucky.

Comment: Re:Shorter answer (Score 1) 121

Perhaps you're not actually reading (in which case I'm not sure this will help) but what I'm yelling is: "I did it, so can you".

I think that perhaps you are missing the point; let me try to explain via analogy.

In this particular story, set in a poor world, there is a lottery, that pays out enough to keep the winner in money for life. Everyone enters the lottery, every week. There is only one winner, and one week it is our friend (you) and he is yelling as hard as he can "Hey everybody! I did it, so can you!!!" and he does not understand why everyone thinks that he is retarded for making that argument. He just cannot understand why everyone is moaning about not having money, when it is so simple to him: just win the lottery, like he did. He also cannot understand why the other people just don't understand what he is saying. Why do they keep complaining about not having money when all they have to do is win the lottery?

I hope you get the point now; if you don't, then there is no hope for you.

Comment: Re:Computer Trespass (Score 1) 223

While two wrongs do not make a right, the law is not about right or wrong. The reason courts place so much emphasis on precedence is to ensure that the law is dispensed fairly - so if someone in the past got X years in jail for committing activity Y with characterstics Y.a, Y.b ... Y.z, then it's only fair that the next person who did Y with Y.a ... Y.z should get a similar sentence. Let me emphasise: The law is not about doing no wrong, so we don't care if the second wrong doesn't make it right; we only care if the second wrong makes it fair.

Comment: Re:Forcing strong passwords in the first place. (Score 1) 211

by goose-incarnated (#43579577) Attached to: Mitigating Password Re-Use From the Other End

First IT people should start with not needing to change my password every month. That will make me select a safer one, because I can remember it.

We do that because the assumption has to be that given enough time, your password will be compromised. The longer you have to wait to change it, the longer the window of exposure when that happens.

Yes. Because of course an attacker that has only had the password for the last 29 days neglected to install backdoors and keypress-capture software in the 29 days that he had access to the system, so of course you should change the password before the attacker installs the malware on the 31st day of compromise.

Is it any wonder, with that 29-day logic, that normal intelligent people regard IT people as slightly retarded? The 29-day policy forces easily guessable dictionary passwords with incrementing numbers somewhere in them, preventing the normal computer user from ever picking a good password. Face it, any system that's been compromised will, within a few minutes, have all its future passwords compromised as well, until such time that the system is purged of all malware. Whether your "assumption" is compromised-within-a-month or a compromised-within-a-day, expiring passwords have no actual effect on security.

Comment: Re:what are you even saying? (Score 1) 302

by goose-incarnated (#43554169) Attached to: Stop Standardizing HTML

No, it's not new or novel, but it's exactly what I proposed... you can already mix your own tags into HTML and style and process them.

Did something like this and was meaning to write up a blog post about this but never got around to it (hey, there's a weekend coming up :)

Feel free to read the rest of the directory for the actual implementation.

Comment: Re:Probably not the best idea... (Score 1) 285

by goose-incarnated (#43535361) Attached to: Protesting Animal Testing, Intruders Vandalize Italian Lab

As far as food goes, it's "need".

I will concede that it is possible, in a technologically advanced society (as we find ourselves in), to, with much expense and effort, replace the meat portion of our diet and supplement a vegetarian diet with pills with only a negligible drop in the nutrition a body gets, but that option is not available to many, nor is it desirable to many of those that it is available to.

Comment: Re:Awesome enterprise tool (Score 1) 49

but it's hard to deny that the consumer-derived 'cloud sharing' stuff frequently beats the IT department on usability and convenience.

Quattro Pro and Wordstar on MSDOS 6.0 beats almost anything the IT department offers in terms of usability and convenience.

Comment: Re:Did it really work? (Score 1) 332

by goose-incarnated (#43523215) Attached to: 64-bit x86 Computing Reaches 10th Anniversary

It's kind of like watching the functional programming people slowly reinvent OOP...makes me scream inside. "Dude, we've figured out a new way to organize our methods / fields so that it's easier to keep them straight in our heads..." "Please God, let it not be OOP." "*talks for a bit*" "Damn it."

I find it quite funny when the OO-crowd goes off like this :-)

(In case no one else clues you in: you've got it backward - Functional came first, and gave the world OO. OO now constantly reinvents everything that lisp had, under the guise of "new and improved")

Comment: Re:The GPL isn't free (Score 1) 630

by goose-incarnated (#43491519) Attached to: Most Projects On GitHub Aren't Open Source Licensed

It is, in fact, very restrictive. If one wants truly free software, one uses a more free license or makes one's code public domain.

I have to respond to this: while I release my stuff (well, much of it) under BSD[1], such as the stuff in my sig below, I never considered that GPL was "restrictive" in any way. It's the creators right to decide how people should redistribute their creations, and if a creator decides that other creators who modify the creation must also release their modifications, then so be it ... there is nothing at all restrictive about asking that people who change your creations and then distribute the changed creations must also allow others to modify the derived creation.

That being said, I tend to use BSD because:

1. Less confusion; only two paragraphs to read

2. I want people to use my stuff and give me credit. BSD let's me do that. I don't care if they modify my stuff and then distribute for a profit - as long as they take care to provide credit to me as the licence requires I'm all good.

3. GPL turns off potential users (remember that contributors are users first, before becoming contributors!) and I'm usually aiming for as many users as possible.

BSD software stands a reasonably high chance (compared to GPL) of getting integrated into a major piece of commercial software. This provides additional avenues of income to me by raising my profile. The value provided by being credited (for example) by Google as a contributor is much much more than I would hope to get from simply releasing my little libraries and experiments for monetary gain or reciprocal sharing.

The only value I can possibly gain from GPL is from the reciprocal sharing, when people contribute code back to my project. That value is too little compared to the value I will gain in raised profile when the code is integrated into a successfull (or not) commercial product.

[1] Some of the older stuff is under GPL as I don't want to maintain them and am hoping someone takes them over.

Comment: Re:Conversion (Score 1) 595

by goose-incarnated (#43451241) Attached to: Is Bitcoin Mining a Real-World Environmental Problem?

(If you'd like to read more email me; I'm about 75% done with a tiny eBook on money and it's development. There will eventually be a bitcoin section in there).

I'd never pay for your eBook with Bitcoin, but I do have a nice sack of potatoes here.

I might not accept bitcoins, but I will certainly accept potatoes :)

My idea of roughing it is when room service is late.

Working...