Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


Comment: Re:Wikileaks? Really? (Score 1) 178

by gnola14 (#35219734) Attached to: The Seven Types of Hackers
I was thinking the exact same thing. First of all, his definition of "hacktivist" is quite broad, so that even blogs or PETA-like sites could fall into that category. Besides, AFAIK Wikileaks just gives a channel to distribute classified information, it doesn't do the hacking themselves. Poor article really, don't know how such a smart guy as Schneier could link it...

Comment: Re:Ummm, because it is different information? (Score 1) 464

by gnola14 (#34499596) Attached to: Pentagon Papers Ellsberg Supports Wikileaks

[...]And I'm speaking as a certified member of the NPR listening, New Yorker reading, free-range organic vegetable eating Liberal Elite[...]

And that should make your opinion (which BTW, is totally self-centered and shows how little you care about the rest of the World) valid?

"Who alone has reason to *lie himself out* of actuality? He who *suffers* from it." -- Friedrich Nietzsche