That's exactly right, and couldn't have said it better myself. We (as in society) still need an electric grid even as we are trying to move towards more sustainable energy sources. Whether it's solar, wind, nuclear, tidal, etc, we still need energy companies to provide transmission cables, transformers, backup power sources (such as natural gas generators for when wind/solar isn't providing enough, etc). Net metering makes sense to incent folks to install solar, but it's not sustainable as more and more folks install solar.
I completely agree with your comment (and disagree that someone marked it as "troll"). They're not using 100% renewable energy if they are hooked up to the grid receiving electricity that was generated by coal/gas/oil/etc. Like you said, if they gathered solar or wind energy during the day and stored it in batteries, that would be 100%. Also, in a factory or manufacturing facility, having a continuous and steady flow of electricity is extremely important and not everyone can rely on variations of solar activity. If I had to make a guess, I would say their solar panels are not directed connected to the factory, but are instead configured like: solar panels-> inverters -> electric grid -> factory. Meaning they're relying on grid-sourced electricity and the solar panels exist solely to have net metering. Finally, many manufacturers use exorbitant amounts of energy. Steel mills, car manufacturing, etc. It's not just a matter of putting a few solar panels on the roof.
I know we're all supposed to buy into the mutants in X-Men as being corollaries for the civil rights movement, but actually registering mutants would be a very logical and beneficial step. A woman who can control the weather? A guy who can destroy buildings if his sunglasses fall off? A girl who can kill you by touching you briefly? People who can shape-shift, instantly teleport past security? People who can control your mind? Guess what? In the real world, having such people walking around controlling the weather on a whim wouldn't work. Gawker.com posted an editorial saying how the government should arrest Global Warming deniers. At the same time, shouldn't we arrest (or at least monitor) those that could actually make the the weather warmer? So yeah, the whole comparison in this story makes no sense. Mutants can (and in the comics are definitely) a menace and should be registered.
Look this is not ideal for folks who want to go out and have a large drink with dinner. But on Mythbusters, they've done a number of driving myths at
.07999% BAC, and the results are pretty dramatic. You are definitely impaired at .08%.
Via the EFF comes news that, during a case involving the use of a Stingray device, the DOJ revealed that it was standard practice to use the devices without explicitly requesting permission in warrants. "When Rigmaiden filed a motion to suppress the Stingray evidence as a warrantless search in violation of the Fourth Amendment, the government responded that this order was a search warrant that authorized the government to use the Stingray. Together with the ACLU of Northern California and the ACLU, we filed an amicus brief in support of Rigmaiden, noting that this 'order' wasn't a search warrant because it was directed towards Verizon, made no mention of an IMSI catcher or Stingray and didn't authorize the government — rather than Verizon — to do anything. Plus to the extent it captured loads of information from other people not suspected of criminal activity it was a 'general warrant,' the precise evil the Fourth Amendment was designed to prevent. ... The emails make clear that U.S. Attorneys in the Northern California were using Stingrays but not informing magistrates of what exactly they were doing. And once the judges got wind of what was actually going on, they were none too pleased:"