At least they decided to put them where they really belong
Of course, being caught is still the main fault of the driver, not the speed camera.
I believe what you are trying to do is move science into the same uncertainty as faith is, as you can't do it the other way around.
Anyway, sciences work completely differently
Faith takes an assumption, and even without proof and even under objective contradiction, sticks with the assumption, arguing away contradiction (which doesn't go away by that)
Science takes an assumption and researches whether the assumption is correct. If there are valid contradiction, the assumption is either dropped or corrected, then repeats from the beginning, until proof is found that the assumption is correct. But even then, new findings may raise new contradictions, at which real scientist will not hesitate to start the whole cycle again.
I reckon the latter is a whole lot more sensible
... for one, the question should also include whether religions are even suited for modern life and scientific advances. Religions mostly still operate on century and millennia old superstition and mysticism, and most (albeit shrinking number of) people will still gladly accept everything thanks to childhood teaching when everything is unquestionably accepted from parents and authority figures.
Anyway, religious leaders (which may or may not "coincide" with political leadership as well) will find a way to lie around contradictions between scientific facts and religious texts. Anything to continue their hold on people's minds, souls and money
After all, Windows is so old school
What, wasn't their faith in god strong enough? It works wonders for children without vaccinations...
In some cases, even religious people will trust science
Of course, supposedly no hard evidence or witnesses.
The general attorney is part of the ministry of justice
All lying bastards
Unless some A**hole posts private pictures after a break-up (or even during a relationship - most likely causing a break-up) - how is anybody going to prove somebody still has any pictures, or from the other side, prove that they deleted compromising pictures?
How long will it be until legislators, courts, etc. arrive in the 21st century? Or the late 20th, for that matter
... Put Death Sentence Under New Scrutiny
There, I fixed it.
It is appalling that a supposedly progressive, modern society needs a revenge-based law.
... if Adobe had started following the suite of App-Developers in the mobile arena
Ultimately, customers are at fault - they shouldn't have renewed any services with Adobe that require the online connection
After the alteration of the writing rules several years ago (adapting spelling and punctuation rules to the stupidity of the people), I reckon this is just the inevitable next step
Why is it so hard to either teach children correctly, or fail them if they don't learn? Of course, with the trends like "no kid left behind" or contra-productive financing decisions (reducing financing for schools that have too few kid finish successfully) seem to favor this
Of course, kid failing in school have multiple reasons
... look like it's time to put a Prime Directive into effect
When providing scientific proof of God, the show should be over quickly
Sure, you can prove that certain events have happened in one way or another (e.g. great flood, Sodom & Gomorrah,
Also, seeing what havoc religion creates on the grand scale (not talking about the personal level - rather what is caused by the conflicts between people of different faith), earth might be better off without it
As for the personal level - speaking of the relation between the individual and the church and/or state - at least some religions seem to be focused in keeping people at bay
Don't get me wrong - there's a lot of good things being done by religious people. But that's just that: the PEOPLE are the ones doing the good things!