Study a bit of history of Europe, or pre-Eisenhower USA, please. I was wrong, you want to go back to the middle ages..
"Conservative/liberal" - Makes no difference to me, but it is proof that Señor Presidente is following orders (promise them anything, give them Chanel), not so unwillingly, as the Beverly Hills lifestyle appeals... The bill would have passed anyway. You can pretend all you want that the republican "opposition" was more than show, but they, along with the democrats, are the ones cashing the checks, not you. Propaganda and lies win elections. That is not their fault.
Your "convention of states" is the same old BS, and it's California's Prop. 13 on meth. It is nothing but tinkering. States politicians are just as corrupt as federal ones, because they are elected by the same people. 50 bickering corrupt fiefdoms certainly is no better than one big one.
Who here is defending "Obamacare"?
Damn! I thought you read the link....
And don't think about Obama. The next one will be worse, and so on. It has been that way at least since LBJ. And your spiel reflects a lack of knowledge of whom he serves. You're still following mass media's lead and focusing on personality.
When you're swimming in it, you aren't expected to be aware. You're in a walled garden. I don't expect you to see outside the boundaries you put up.
Which is strange, even now these guys still idolize him.
You're absolutely right. The democrats didn't do any of that because they are "spineless". Nothing could be further from the truth. They did it because they are corrupt. Of course the republicans are deceitful in their faux "opposition to the wonderful windfall to come from this bill. The game was very well played, while you all missed all the action, but watched (and believed) all the commercials.
I don't think that's enough for national support.
In all seriousness, machine politics being what it is, he's the only one who can fake a plausible challenge to Clinton. Basically, I think he should accept his destiny in the role of Daley's successor, and he should just milk what he can out of Chicago. The system will reward him well, unfortunate as it may be. Very few people are voting to change that, least of all, those who are infatuated with big money politicians who whisper sweet words of "liberty".
You gotta pick the right one... One that shows how to lead by example... People will always follow the example, hardly ever the words when there's a conflict.
Are you that crippled that you don't know how to decide things for and by yourself? Pity...
The Civil War? You seem to prefer early post civil war through the Gilded Age. I can understand this sentiment from the privileged point of view.
Well, I'm still votin' for Sheriff Buford T. Justice... It's time to cleanup DEE CEE
Rahm? I think he needs to spend some time in finishin' school before being set loose. Gotta round off some of those rough edges if he wants to go up against Ms. Hillary.
You are more than welcome to vote for anybody you wish. And I have to admit, you can't go wrong with Romney
To nature, yes. Man values some cultures more than others. More than likely he will value his own above all others. Other than that, I don't understand the question.