Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive


Forgot your password?
Slashdot Deals: Deal of the Day - 6 month subscription of Pandora One at 46% off. ×

Comment Re:Issue is more complicated (Score 4, Insightful) 928

Would you treat coworkers like that? In meatspace? If someone called me a fuckwad in a way that wasn't obviously jokey/ironic it would be a huge problem to me. Being nice and civil is a much better way to get things done. Like, grumpy/curmudgeonly is kinda par for the course but that's totally different.

I used to work with a really toxic dev that for whatever reason our management dept protected. He was extremely misogynistic and refused to work with any women. One time in a meeting he said something basically like "it's in the spec, you stupid bitch" (as an aside, it wasn't in the spec ;p). He used to get away with yelling at people etc. Then I got sucked into the daily meetings and said basically "there is no call to raise your voice in a meeting at work. if you have a personal problem with me, we can go outside and talk about it". Never had a problem with him after that - unsurprisingly most misogynists and bullies are in reality cowards.

Comment Grandstanding nonsense. (Score 1) 488

Does anyone believe that the NSA shared any details or scope about their hardware purchase? Or any of their vendors?

"Hi we're building out datacenters so we can do some probably illegal data snooping, can you help us?" I'm sure an agency that is cloaked in as much secrecy as possible goes around sharing that sort of information. Especially without gag orders.

Not only is she a massive tool she's obviously full of it. She needs a gag, it's an order.

Comment Great - except for one thing (Score 2) 133

The business side is why the company exists. When they add feature creep etc, it's generally because they don't really know what the customer wants and are trying to see what lands. They don't understand the cost of changing the design / refactoring. They tend to not even really understand how to tell if a time estimate is BS or not.

It comes down to trust and working relationships. The business side almost never bridges the tech side - it's up to tech folks to bridge that gap and help them understand. Often times they simply won't care.

Sucky but that's the way the industry generally works. There are a few bright spots but they're few and far between. However the attitude of "I'm going to be a lone hero and push this out!" is just setting yourself up for more frustration and failure. There's a quote - "in writing, you must kill your darlings". Same thing applies to softdev, be prepared to write elegant code you are proud of, only to have it rot away and disappear. Your options are basically;

1) stay professional, do your job, collect your paycheck
2) try to find some startup with ideals like fogcreek (when it comes to valuing individual developers)
3) simplify your lifestyle and financial requirements and write code for your own projects, do a little contracting or take a job in a different field

Comment Re:I'm spending 60% of my monthly income on rent (Score 1) 940

The 3x rent as salary thing is fairly new and common with newer buildings. I've been a renter for the last 15 years in a few different large cities; it used to be largely based on your credit score and rental history. They would work with you if you had a strong rental history but marginal credit.

In my current apartment (which is fairly upscale/new) they did the 3x rent/income, a credit check for any late payments and that's it. They didn't care about my 15 year rental history with details.

Comment Really only two main reasons I can think of.. (Score 1) 118

1) Many hardware vendors, especially storage, will give you trouble or refuse to support their gear if you're running an OS they don't bless

2) It can make business continuity easier; you'll find more people who claim RHEL/CentOS support than Debian (though Ubuntu is pretty wide-spread these days).

The rest are pretty minor. Some C level tools want to feel like they're magically protected by vendor support.

The reality is I've pretty much always had to do my own diagnostics, RCA and come up with a resolution. If there's no patch in a RHEL blessed kernel but there is in mainline, I'd just as soon pull it in and patch it myself, which is way easier to do IMO using something like Debian, or write a patch myself if necessary.

So I'd say if you're having to deal with a lot of hardware support it might be worth it just to get less pushback but if you're mostly cloud based or just have a few machines go with whatever you think rocks (unless you suck, but you would never realize that :P)

At one shop we all wanted to use Debian but the vendor only "supported" suse/rhel etc.. so we went so far as to modify uname and whatnot to pretend we were a redhat shop ;)

Comment Wouldn't give them a dime (Score 4, Insightful) 102

Either they're in on the theft somehow, or they're a totally unethical company trying to extort people. No trustworthy security vendor would withhold information about sites that are compromised from the site operators.

I think it's just a marketing ploy personally. "You may have already won! Contact us for details ($1.99 a minute)".

Regardless, they're on my list of companies to never do business with in any way. I

Comment not a good candidate (Score 5, Interesting) 550

I don't have enough material in my cornea. If they mess it up, there's not much they can do for adjustments.

As long as your eyeball remains parabolic, they can correct your vision more or less indefinetly assuming there's no other issues going on. Once you get lasik, your cornea becomes flattened so they can't really correct stuff with optics so well anymore.

I'd rather be safe and be able to have my vision correctable by contacts and glasses than take a chance at having really terrible vision that is then uncorrectable.

I feel like that's something people need to be made more aware of - lasik flattens your cornea so corrective lenses won't really work as well.

Comment Re:Linux version? (Score 1) 234

That's not real security. That's the same as security through obscurity.

Linux and open source software has always had the security benefit of the code being distributed. No matter if specific components are properly audited or bugs exist for years before being discovered, it's still a powerful weapon you don't get with M$ / OSX et al.

The more people who used Linux, the more eyes would be on the code. So yeah, it'd be more of a target, but the power of open ideals would also scale.

A failure will not appear until a unit has passed final inspection.