Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


Comment: Re:Pricing... (Score 1) 335

by finkster (#14484612) Attached to: Oracle and Sun Team Up to Provide .NET Alternative
While it is entirely true that .NET does have more of a "Production Ready" mix of languages, which boil everything down to MSIL (Microsoft Intermediate Language) - more so than Bytecodes (Java's IL), I have to ask why is this such an issue?

Every project that I have worked on in the past 18 years has been completed using a single-language. The exception for this is web-based applications where you have a mix of languages in each tier:
        Front-end: HTML, JavaScript
        Middle Tier: VB, Java,, or c#
        Data Tier: SQL, Stored Procedures (PL/SQL, TSQL, Java SPs)

Would it NOT be more productive if you had a single language that was common amongst all of the tiers in an application? This would provide maximum coverage for all of the developers and would extend the knowledge base as new aspects of the application are added.

While I am not saying Java is the BEST tool for all problems, it is a good choice for solving problems on many different tiers of an application.

If it were YOUR money running an IT shop, wouldn't you want to leverage all of your developers on all of the different parts of an application?

Have you reconsidered a computer career?