Also, an oft-quoted simpsons cameo...
Leonard Nimoy on the Simpsons
Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!
We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).
Also, an oft-quoted simpsons cameo...
Coming to terms with variance makes MTG, and really any game involving chance, much more tolerable.
Everyone would have to live outside like hobos. Also, considering my advanced foraging techniques, I will probably have my pick of the breeding stock.
I, for one, welcome our robotic overlords.
Couldn't the complexity of chess be solved without necessarily finding a polynomial, or better, way to solve it? So, without necessarily reducing NP to P, but just being able to compute the average number of potential moves in a game, supposedly 2^50 or so.
You do, if you want to do it accurately. There may have been a number of moves that Crafty thought were blunders, but they were actually good moves.
Right? I don't think an engine that rates the value of blunders has much meaning until chess is solved.
lawcomic.net looks pretty dope. The about page definitely got my attention. I put it in the tabs for browsing in a bit. What's your take on it?
As far as witness testimony; what is funny is that, on the books, a police officer's word in court is taken as fact. I guess as long as no conflicting, actual evidence is found. I don't really have a better solution, since that turns every 1on1 arrest/ticket scenario into a case of 'his word against hers', or whatever you want to call it. Witnesses end up fabricating more and more elaborate stories, depending on how they are pressured by interrogators, or just because they feed off the attention.
I think it's tied closely with the need to dramatize one's own life, so someone can picture their contribution as an epic struggle instead of prosaic or unnecessary. Like Brian Williams can retell the story of narrowly avoiding rocket-death to himself before he can even apprehend that he is exaggerating, or like I try to imagine an epic struggle for philosophical superiority when I pay for a minor ticket in court.
I don't know a lot, but I am willing to bet that autistic people are as different from each other as they differ from us.
There have been all kinds of articles on that tip recently. I will just leave the google results. They seem to come to every possible permutation of conclusion on the subject, but there are a lot of good brain graphics.
Uniqueness of Autistic Brains
I don't know about that. It looks like somebody would have had to find the exploit and kept quiet. The vague language in the summary made it sound serious enough that selling tools for it would probably make a headline or two. Remote access, full admin control, deleting files (gasp), actually did someone just confuse a movie review of Blackhat with a real event?
OS X is like this too. The desktop widgets are always calling home for "updates".
How much are the bricks?
Yeah, it's funny that I posted that, I later realized, after having a conversation 2 days before about how memory is sometimes not reliable, even when someone professes 100% certainty, like in coerced confessions.
What a scumbag sociopath, though. His excuse for lying was that he misremembered and wasn't aware how he could have done that. He pulled a full Alberto Gonzalez in his "apology".
What is the saying about, under a repressive regime, the only reliable source of news must take the form of parody? Between Jon Stewart, Stephen Colbert, and John Oliver being some of the only places to get honest, unpretentious "news", it seems very accurate today.
Although there are exceptions to every rule, this honor among thieves is a rather ridiculous notion.
At the very least, should you get less than expected purchasing something from someone who steals for a living, you are required to respond with I should have seen that coming.
I think it's the lawful evil mindset that explains this behavior. Self-interest provides an incentive for the seller to have buyers perceive them as honoring their agreements, if not general morality. I know that not everything can be explained with AD&D metaphors, but the alignments are a good abstraction to describe a lot of behavior.
I took an online alignment test and despite answering it truthfully (some answers I would be hesitant to reveal in real life), I surprisingly got a neutral good result. I always thought I was chaotic good or true neutral.
If anyone is interested: alignment test
All you need is some bolt-cutters and lock-picks...