Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
For the out-of-band Slashdot experience (mostly headlines), follow us on Twitter, or Facebook. ×

Comment: Re:Please Expand (Score 1) 113 113

I would very much like some information from you on this.

I have a B.S in Compy Sci, I worked in programming for several years, then I jumped into the management track.

I have kept up the programming for fun (Write flash games, taught my kids to code, etc.).

My company is doing a "reorganization" and my position is being eliminated (My entire department is). I'm getting severance for years put in, and having my accumulated leave paid out. That covers me for quite a while, my car is paid off and I have less than 5 years left on my mortgage, no other debt and a ton of savings. I was toying with the notion of being self-employed as a programmer (As in, a friend has some actually good ideas for apps that haven't been made yet, I can code them).

How is coding as freelance? How do you do your taxes? Did you set up your company at your house, or a P.O. Box?

Thanks

Wow. There are a few questions there. Let me see if I can answer a couple without going off tangent.

Coding as a freelancer has been pretty good. I get to work on interesting problems. I get to choose who I want to work with. I get to learn and grow as a developer and at a personal by engaging with people in different countries, different backgrounds.

My accountant looks after my taxes. It's not complicated, money comes on, money goes out. But he's the expert and I don't want to fuck things up. It's something I learned when I was managing. A book that I dug at the time was James Persse's "Hollywood Secrets of Project Management Success", which basically asks the question: what can project managers learn from the Hollywood system that manages to churn out film after film, year after year, generally on time and on budget. Seriously, they do. Not all of them make a return on investment, but the real shockers we hear about - where some "star" gets his/her own way and ruins a studio with a runaway pet project - are way off the norm. The vast majority of Hollywood films are delivered on budget, yet they have the same mix of technical and creative activities as IT project - and have to respond to change in an agile manner.

My takeaway is that Hollywood has been doing all this for over a century and have figured out that you basically need to (a) manage risk and (b) have the right people doing the right job. Two things we are spectacularly bad at doing in the IT. Ah, and there I go off tangent.

My point is, I let people who know what they are doing worry about the tax, the company structure, etc. I just do what I love, which is coding. Do a good job, opportunities seem to arise - though I'm sure there's more to it.

Yes, I work from home - if that's what you are asking. Don't have any use for a PO Box. Everything happens on the internet anyway.

You seem superbly set up to give working as a freelancer a go. I don't have the luxury of a small mortgage, which can be a stress when you're waiting for invoices to be paid and such. But is it what you want to do? You have an opportunity here. Maybe use it to figure out what you really want to be doing with your time on Earth.

This may be terrible advice, but maybe just hunt down what makes you happy. Wish I did earlier, instead of following a career train I thought was what you were meant to do as a "grown up" - and missed out on too much watching my own kids growing up.

Sounds like you got it sorted. Your heart has probably already made the choices you'll use your head to justify. Good luck.

Comment: Re:Don't Do IT! (Score 1) 113 113

Toyota Production System? TPS? Doesn't that require properly formatted cover sheets in its report?

Heh.. as important a film as Office Space is, that little acronym has done nothing but a disservice to one of the most practical and human-centric management disciplines in current use :)

At least once a year I look up IMDB to find answers to the question: did Ronald Livingston peak in 1999, or has he done more fine work since.

Comment: Re:Don't Do IT! (Score 4, Interesting) 113 113

As someone who transitioned from Jockey to ShitMover I can assure you the move isn't worth the headaches. I used to work with a great bunch of like minded people who where interested in creation. Now i work with a bunch of egotistical idiots who just want to push stuff they know is garbage over the line just so they can get ticks against their name and get out before it blows up.

Absolutely agree with the AC here. I made the move to management about 10 years ago and consider this a lost decade. Moved back to coding as a freelance and loving it.

If you must, then at least learn some of the disciplines around management. Take some time to read up on management systems that actually work (e.g. Toyota Production System) and don't lose sight of your analytical past. I found the skills developed as a coder - being able to break a problem down into smaller parts, using empirical techniques to determine whether an approach would (or did) work... using logic and evidence - were of paramount importance to succeeding as a manager.

On the flip side, I found a lot of magical thinking on the part of other managers - refusing to believe what maths or reason made self-evident. That's where people skills come in - getting people over the hump of their own prejudices or wishful thinking. Get the mix right and you'll shine.

Good luck in any case.

Comment: Nice use of ambiguous quotes (Score 3, Insightful) 266 266

From the FA: 'no evidence fracking has a "widespread" impact on drinking water'

What does "widespread" mean? Is this like bullets, where statistically they do no harm but in certain localised scenarios (e.g. entering a particular human body at speed) they cause a lot of damage?

I'm not sure what the water management strategies are like in the US, but I find it hard to conceive that communities may not be affected by the impact of fracking in their region. The article mentions the impact in "select areas" - and problems when the water supply is constrained (US never suffers droughts, do they?) - but doesn't go into details in the article. Does this mean that some communities are effectively shut off from their local water supply because of fracking? It's unclear.

I suspect the potential impact of fracking is more complex than the one-line takeaway from a report. But I'm not a geoscientist, so I'll shut up now.

Comment: Re:4? (Score 1) 229 229

After you play it through (assuming you are playing on a PC), check out nexusmods. I went out and bought the PC version just for the mods. They add an incredible amount of story an detail to an already rich universe.

http://www.nexusmods.com/fallo...?

Thank you Jackie. We've been playing on console, but plan is to build a rig to complete our gaming experience for the family. Funnily enough, I'm the least active gamer in the family (as in I play the least, again to you AC). When I go to spec the gaming box, if I happen to mention that it's for my wife I fully expect the "sure it is" retort I got when bought the original XBox.

Ha, my good lady has just started watching the trailer again. I can hear it playing in the background. The woman is obsessed - heard her shout "bobble head".

Anyway, again... thank you for the advice. It'll be something to look forward to when we do get to play it on PC.

Comment: Re:4? (Score 1) 229 229

Sure. Such as a series of the most legendary games in history.

My wife is having kittens (metaphorically, getting in before you Mr AC) at the moment - having just watched the trailer.

We came to the series somewhat late, after buying Fallout 3 in a sale and then leaving it forgotten, unwrapped, for months. But since starting on it, it's been the biggest detriment to household productivity since Skyrim. We've been looking forward to New Vegas (also currently unwrapped), but this... this gives us something to aim for. MUST finish all the series before Fallout 4 comes out.

You got to have goals in life.

Comment: Re:Machine learning? (Score 0) 184 184

Are these crazy comments a product of naive machine learning algorithms?

Or code used for illicit communications?

Any ideas?

Yeah, I've been wondering that myself. If it's a bot, it's fucking annoying. If it's a human, I don't know why they don't keep their crap on Facebook.

Comment: Fear of the West? (Score 5, Interesting) 268 268

I know Russians who are busily working on all sorts of interesting technologies in-house (SCADA, DCS, etc) There seems to be a real fear that if sanctions increase they'll be cut off from technology they need to run their industrial systems. It seems to have sparked a renaissance in the local software community, hell-bent of forging a form of self-reliance. Interesting to see where all this leads.

Comment: Re:acceptance is the only fair outcome (Score 3, Informative) 301 301

There's been commentary from the paper's authors on this. Along the lines of "the peer reviewer did provide a detailed list of suggestions for how they could make it better". Hard to revise if the best advice is to able to run a mile as fast as a man.

Agreed, we don't know the quality of the research. It could have been shit. It could have just been bad science. But now the whole thing has been skewed by the ad hominem attack on the researchers themselves.

Comment: Re:This reveals a need for blind review (Score 1) 301 301

I'm surprised because every review process I've seen was blind. Papers are submitted with just an ID, authors are not disclosed until the paper is accepted (they are never disclosed if it is rejected, as far as I'm aware). PLoS One is reputable enough that I would've expected the same.

Yeah, I thought it was strange that the reviewer cited the researchers' web sites in the review, where their gender would have been apparent.

The study was conducted by only two authors, both of whom appear (judging by their webpages) to be evolutionary biologists at the post-doc level.

Comment: Re:Getting lost in the shuffle. (Score 1) 301 301

OP. Good point. From what I've read, there may have been problems with the paper as first submitted. But one complaint from the researchers was that instead of being directed to areas where their methodology needed addressing - or their paper being rejected on the basis of the quality of research - they were told to "get a man to read it" (which, incidentally they had already done, via male colleagues).

So yes, now it will be difficult to review the paper on its own merits. Sexism still manages to distort the playing field, even when its adherents are put to the task.

+ - Scientists have paper on gender bias rejected because they're both women->

ferrisoxide.com writes: A paper co-authored by researcher fellow Dr. Fiona Ingleby and evolutionary biologist Dr. Megan Head — on how gender differences affect the experiences that PhD students have when moving into post-doctoral work — was rejected by peer-reviewed PLoS One journal because they didn’t ask a man for help.

A (male) peer reviewer for the journal suggested that the scientists find male co-authors, to prevent “ideologically biased assumptions.” The same reviewer also provided his own ironically biased advice, when explaining that women may have fewer articles published because men's papers "are indeed of a better quality, on average", "just as, on average, male doctoral students can probably run a mile race a bit faster".

Link to Original Source

The sooner you fall behind, the more time you have to catch up.

Working...