Comment: Re:What? Again? (Score 3, Insightful) 807
And lo and behold, the vast swath of meaningless paper pushers are gone, replaced with email, databases, and computers.
You clearly haven't dealt with the U.S. healthcare system recently.
|
|
And lo and behold, the vast swath of meaningless paper pushers are gone, replaced with email, databases, and computers.
You clearly haven't dealt with the U.S. healthcare system recently.
At least, until a significant portion of the population is killed off.
Can we just skip to that part?
Hmm, fembots. I suppose the Apple model will be prettier, but much more expensive?
The real problem is that it will demand ecosystem monogamy.
Was the boldfaced "standard" not clear enough?
Why should I have to throw away the perfectly good displays that I already have?
... hate Amerikuh?
It seems like a massive missed opportunity to me, but I'm not optimized for media consumption.
I want the 1680x1050 screen that my ThinkPad T60 had 5 frippin' years ago (along with the connections types -- 2 external displays -- that one can't get with Apple products).
A 16x9 "optimized for media consumption" display is ridiculous in a work laptop.
I purchased two of these a few months ago (replacing a couple of 1680x1050 Acer displays), and I couldn't be happier.
It's something that you get to reduce the price of your Internet access in most of the U.S. (The "bundles" offered by the telcos and cable TV providers here are almost always less expensive that Internet service by itself.)
Remember that none of this stuff will work if you have even the faintest hint of security on your home network.
Don't even think about putting your spiffy new never-patched, Internet accessing, firewall-less "smart" devices on a separate subnet from your WiFi if you want to actually use these features.
How dare you insult my Jesus crackers like that.
Mmmmmm
Q: What do you call a principal female opera singer whose high C is lower than those of other principal female opera singers? A: A deep C diva.