Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×

Comment: Re:Patectic ITU (Score 2) 199

by extremistZA (#35485748) Attached to: How AT&T Totally Flubbed 4G

Well said.

Where I'm from (South Africa) the "What is 4G" question is a hot topic as it is affecting how operators may or may not advertise their networks.

Because of this we actually have an official statement from the ITU which basically states that while they don't necessarily endorse the use of 4G for non IMT-Advanced networks, they acknowledge that networks are going to do (and have done) so.

I also have the GSMA on record saying that they think that LTE will be considered 4G, even though it technically isn't.

Anyway, saying that the ITU "now defines 4G as any cellular Internet network that's faster than what was considered the fastest technology in 2009" is needlessly inaccurate. If anyone in the US would just pick up the phone and call the ITU for clarification on the statement released in December this misunderstanding need not be perpetuated.

"Now this is a totally brain damaged algorithm. Gag me with a smurfette." -- P. Buhr, Computer Science 354

Working...