Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Why are the number of cabs [artificially] limit (Score 1) 92

by euroq (#47439799) Attached to: Lyft's New York Launch Halted By Restraining Order

proper training and licensing of drivers

In the two major cities that I've lived in (in the U.S.), cab drivers are hands down the worst drivers on the road. Usually they didn't grow up in the U.S. and therefore don't drive the same. America has its faults, but we drive comparatively well compared to the rest of the world.

An interesting anecdote from a friend of mine who moved here from South America told me how he was amazed how everyone here follows the rules. He observed a thug-looking fellow bellowing loud music and smoking a joint in his car, with the implication that he probably was a person who committed crimes, but he still stopped at the stop sign.

Comment: Re:Typical Anti-White Guy stuff (Score 1) 265

by euroq (#47330775) Attached to: Tech Workforce Diversity At Facebook Similar To Google And Yahoo

FYI to your racist rant, actually it's just African Americans that are athletically superior, not blacks. African Americans are genetically superior athletically due to selective breeding due to slavery and therefore physical work. This does actually confront the "baseball" comparison of the 1950's which does not relate to 2014 Facebook racial makeup.

Comparatively, horses are incredibly larger, stronger, faster, etc., than they were just a mere 2000 years ago due to the military importance of them and therefore the immense selective breeding that came of it. The reasons a few certain countries in Africa such as Kenya always win marathons is due to genetic makeups, but it's not a "black" thing it's a gene pool thing.

"Asians" in your view are actually American Asians. The Asians who come to America are financially superior than their counterparts who could not come.

However, humans are 99.9% genetically similar. There is no plausibility that any human by race could not become equal to another by another race within a few generations of genetic swapping.

Comment: Re:It's too slow. (Score 1) 254

by euroq (#47303681) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: Best Way to Learn C# For Game Programming?

So he STILL needs to learn C or C++ if he's serious about writing games. Even a graphically-intense smartphone game has C underpinnings.

WTF? No, he or she doesn't! Name 1 game that actually requires a programmer to learn C or C++, and I can name 100 or even 200 that don't. ESPECIALLY on a smartphone.

Comment: Re:It's too slow. (Score 1) 254

by euroq (#47303673) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: Best Way to Learn C# For Game Programming?

Java is, by all benchmarks that I can find, the fastest non-native language that exists. Java was known as slow in 1996. It's been intensely optimized since. I'm sure there are some programs that are sometimes faster due to very circumstantial situations. Here's one example, there are countless others: http://benchmarksgame.alioth.d...

I also think my given citation or the many others I can find just isn't enough to make any declaration about which is "fastest" - it would be safe to say they are fairly equivalent, and this whole argument about their comparative speeds is stupid. Average CPU abilities, amount of memory accessible, and what not change so consistently that anything you write now which is a little bit too slow will be fast enough in a year.

Comment: Re:It's too slow. (Score 1) 254

by euroq (#47303617) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: Best Way to Learn C# For Game Programming?

but anything that really needs fancy graphics or fast processing will need C++ or C.

Totally incorrect. Anything that needs fancy graphics just require an SDK with access to a fancy graphics processing engine. I've written games in Java that use OpenGL on the backend. You don't need the language to be C or C++ to access OpenGL. As far as fast processing requirements, I guarantee you most games don't actually need processing that would not be fast enough in bytecode but would be fast enough in native code.

Comment: Re:Wait a sec (Score 1) 772

by euroq (#47112225) Attached to: Belief In Evolution Doesn't Measure Science Literacy

the existence of a man named Jesus who was crucified in the first century is one of the most verified humans in antiquity

The most verified? The most discussed, sure. I doubt the most verified. There are thousands of data points about the existence of Julius Caesar. How many exist for said Jesus character?

Comment: Re:Jump through the mirror? (Score 1) 237

by euroq (#46873345) Attached to: Erik Meijer: The Curse of the Excluded Middle

And could JIT beat any programmer simply because it can profile and optimize at runtime against the actual usage, rather than hypothethised usage?

Huh? You were just saying that compilers optimize better than humans, then say that Java cannot beat any human? I'm sick of all these Java haters... :/

"Only the hypocrite is really rotten to the core." -- Hannah Arendt.

Working...