Comment: Re:Mod the summary funny (Score 2, Interesting) 663
Comment: Re:ArkivMusic or Naxos (Score 2, Interesting) 228
I find this whole audiophile thing pretty interesting, especially now something very similar starting to spill over into mainstream photography. JPEGS are out!, we need 16 bit RAW files for out holiday snaps! As a digital artist, I find it disturbing that people are going to let a JPEG artefact (real or imaginary) spoil their enjoyment of a picture: you're looking at it wrong!
I just couldn't let this pass by without comment. Yes, I am a flac kind of a person, and take pride in ripping music with the absolute highest quality. I am also a photographer, and yes, I shoot in raw format. Why? Because I do post-processing. On every photo I take. A good-quality jpeg is indistinguishable from raw until you start doing the least bit of editing. Then the differences will be clear as day and night. Ever tried rescuing an underexposed 8-bit JPEG and then try the same with a 12-bit raw? And don't get me started about color spaces...
JPEG is perfect for the holiday shooter, though, but personally I long for the 16-bit raw files (best available today on 35-mm SLR:s is 14-bit). That will take care of *some* of the imaging artifacts that come from the rounding errors between the sensor and the memory card.
Comment: Re:Wonderful (Score 1) 207
And the ability to zoom in to certain views was pretty awesome. If Ansel Adams were alive today, I wonder what his opinion would be and if he would use such a technique. He would have ot do something. Many of the films he liked to use are no longer in production - at least in the 4x5 format he liked.
Don't insult the name of Ansel Adams.
I'm a photographer myself, and I have yet to see a gigapan that looks lood. Why do people think that the resolution is interesting at all? A photo is all about capturing something interesting, and that requires hard work from the guy behind the camera. Gigapixel is the latest excuse for lazy photographers to make boring photos. A great (no, let me say legendary) photographer like Adams doesn't need gigapans. And large format photography is alive and kicking, btw.
Comment: 3.5 fluent... (Score 1) 674
Daily basis and fluent: Swedish, German, English, (+Swiss German, which I for these purposes just count as a half language)
Less fluent: French
No problems communicating in Norwegian and Danish, too. Summing up to 3.5 or 6.5, depending on how you count.
Currently learning Mandarin, and can read Dutch text at full speed
And I agree with what many people above have written: Learn a language. Srsly.
Comment: Re:I deleted my account months ago (Score 2, Informative) 249
Comment: Re:Not what it used to be (Score 1) 70
I can still remember "getting" how binary worked standing there and to a 10 year old geek-wannabe,
I don't believe you could have understood binary when you were only two years old!
There are 10 types of people in the world:
Those who understand binary,
those who don't,
and then there's people who don't understand zero-based indices
Comment: NMT (Score 3, Informative) 308
Comment: Re:I'm moving to Sweden (Score 2, Informative) 288
Umm, dude, prostitution is legal in many European countries.
Comment: Re:A honeypot? Or are they for real? (Score 1) 288
You expect the Swedish Parliament to give up prosecutorial immunity?
I certainly don't hope for it, but in the case I referred to above copyright was put above the constitutional Offentlighetsprincipen. Anything is possible when dealing with pirates, it seems. Thanks to IPRED we now have private entities doing policework and the government spies on our internet traffic thanks to FRA.