Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: rsync.net FTW. (Score 4, Informative) 482

by enselsharon (#36464842) Attached to: Open Source Alternative To Dropbox?

I've had personal and business accounts at rsync.net going back over 5 years.

It's simple, it's straightforward, and it works out of the box with everything I use.

Oh, and there's this:

http://www.rsync.net/resources/notices/canary.txt

It's not the cheapest offering, but my employers' account @ 2TB is around 28 cents/GB, per month.

Comment: Compare to this, in the real world ... (Score 1) 119

by enselsharon (#34504864) Attached to: The First Truly Honest Privacy Policy

http://www.rsync.net/resources/notices/tos.html

I especially like:

"No form of data or meta-data concerning the behavior of our customers or the contents of their filesystems, or
even the customer data that we hold in our records for billing, will ever be divulged to any law enforcement
officer or agency without order served directly by a US court having jurisdiction. "

and:

"No consumer or personal information about our customers of any kind will be divulged to any party for any reason."

Comment: Only do business with ISPs with Warrant Canaries (Score 1) 227

by enselsharon (#30588558) Attached to: Canadian Censorship Takes Down 4500 Sites

I would like to do business with ISPs that have Warrant Canaries:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warrant_canary

Like my offsite backup provider maintains:

http://www.rsync.net/resources/notices/canary.txt

However, in absence of this (I realize this is rare) your ISP should at the very least have a stated policy as to how they respond to warrants and "requests".

Turning off an entire block of IP space because some joker calls you on the phone is absolutely terrible. If you continue to do business with "serverloft" you deserve whatever you get.

Censorship

The Chinese Route To a Web Free of Porn 420

Posted by kdawson
from the regarding-babies-and-bathwater dept.
An anonymous reader writes "Despite repeated 'for the children' campaigns, the Western Web as a whole has provided little or no isolation of pornography. This is why the Chinese are now attempting to march to a place where no country has been before: a Web without porn. Recent regulations have included closing down 'vulgar' mobile sites, disconnecting 'obscene' servers, and restricting domain registrations. Yet the breaking news for Monday is that China is planning to enforce a whitelist on foreign domains: in particular, any e-commerce will have to register locally and obey Chinese law before they get whitelisted. Domains will otherwise be 'irresolvable' to Chinese Internet users. Meanwhile, the government is promoting this campaign heavily, calling it a 'fresh start.' It seems the Chinese may have to do without the Internet, before they can rid it of porn."
Transportation

The Last GM Big-Block V-8 Rolls Off the Line 525

Posted by kdawson
from the blow-it-out-gto dept.
DesScorp writes "It's the end of an era in auto technology, as the very last big block V-8 engine from GM has rolled off the production line. The L18 engine was the last variant of an engine that had been in continuous production for over 50 years. The big blocks powered everything from the classic muscle cars of the '60s and '70s to heavy-duty trucks today. From the Buffalo News: 'When GM said last June the L18 would be eliminated by year's end, the announcement triggered another show of devotion to the product. Some customers ordered two years' worth of L18s, to put on the shelf for future use.' More than 5 million big blocks have been produced over the engine's history. The final big block engine to come off the line in Tonawanda, NY is headed for the GM Heritage Center in Sterling Heights, MI."
Google

How Do I Keep My Privacy While Using Google? 533

Posted by Soulskill
from the encrypt-your-search-terms dept.
hubert.lepicki writes "I use Google all the time. I keep two GMail tabs open when I'm online (one is private, another is a corporate account), I use Google search, and recently I switched to the Chromium browser. Google's services are fast, easy to use and usually reliable. At the same time, I know Google is tracking everything I do; I can see it in search results or their ads on web pages, which tend to match my interests. After the recent post by Mozilla's community director suggesting Bing has a better privacy policy (a response to questionable comments from Google CEO Eric Schmidt), I started to... 'google' ways of keeping my private data safe while browsing and using Google services. The results weren't very helpful, so I ask you, Slashdotters: how do I stay anonymous to Google while using their services?"
Censorship

Iran Slows Internet Access Before Student Protests 289

Posted by timothy
from the oh-y'know-the-usual dept.
RiffRafff writes "Iran is at it again, pre-emptively slowing or cutting Internet access before anticipated student protests." From the article: "Seeking to deny the protesters a chance to reassert their voice, authorities slowed Internet connections to a crawl in the capital, Tehran. For some periods on Sunday, Web access was completely shut down — a tactic that was also used before last month's demonstration. The government has not publicly acknowledged it is behind the outages, but Iran's Internet service providers say the problem is not on their end and is not a technical glitch."

Comment: A lesser form of the FSOSA meme... (Score 1) 130

by enselsharon (#30219418) Attached to: UK File-Sharing Laws Unenforceable On Mobile Networks

I don't think FSOSA (free speech or stone age) had this (somewhat middle ground) scenario in mind, but it rhymes quite a bit.

Basically, you can't quash speech unless people can't access laptops and wireless cards. Period. You either go back to the stone age or accept arbitrary, free speech.

But in this case you don't even need to resort to some grassroots, duct-taped together community mesh network - you just need to get one or two abstractions away from the proper "Internet" and you're already there. Which is really great news, actually.

Privacy

UK File-Sharing Laws Unenforceable On Mobile Networks 130

Posted by kdawson
from the p2p-ringtones dept.
superglaze writes "UK mobile broadband providers currently have no way of telling which subscribers are file-sharing which copyrighted content, ZDNet UK reports. This represents something of a problem for new laws that have been proposed to crack down on unlawful file-sharing. According to the article, databases (tracking IP address mappings) could be built to make it possible to identify what specific users are downloading, but the industry is loathe to fund this sort of project itself. Also, as an analyst points out in the piece, users of prepaid phone cards are mostly anonymous in the UK, which creates another challenge for the government's plans. And if that isn't enough, connection-sharing apps like JoikuBoost would make identification pretty much impossible anyway."

Comment: Re:Sonos - it begins and ends with Sonos (Score 2, Informative) 438

by enselsharon (#30019664) Attached to: Simple, Cost-Effective, Multiroom Audio?

Sonos is the answer. The problem with all of the lower priced squeezebox-style systems is that they save money on components by not having the decoding hardware inside of them. That is the reason that even with a stock-standard samba share, you STILL need to install their "server software" on the system you store your music on.

In reality the "server software" is actually doing some or all of the transcoding of the music format because the units themselves don't have the horsepower to do it.

The sonos systems, OTOH, have the necessary horsepower, so you can just point them at your A/UX based fileserver (or whatever else you want to point them at) and say "just work".

I've had a 5-zone sonos system for 4+ years now and could not be happier.

GUI

Clutter Reaches 1.0 Release Candidate Status 78

Posted by timothy
from the my-clutter's-been-manifest-since-1974 dept.
nerdyH writes "Intel's interesting 3D UI technology has arrived at a significant milestone. Emmanuele Bassi on Monday released Clutter 1.0rc1, commenting 'This is a development release of Clutter 0.9 leading towards the 1.0 stable cycle. It is the first release candidate for the 1.0.0 release.' Clutter is a centerpiece of Intel's Moblin stack for netbooks, MIDs, and IVIs. It aims beyond the traditional 2D 'desktop' UI metaphor, stepping up to a 'theatrical' metaphor in which 2D interface objects are likened to 'actors' moving around on a 3D 'stage,' with developers in the role of 'director.' Also updated Tuesday: the Clutter-GTK+ library, aimed at helping GTK+ developers Clutter up their existing apps."

Comment: Re:That's it, I'm moving to ... rsync.net (Score 1) 195

by enselsharon (#28385257) Attached to: Proposed Canadian Law Would Allow Warrantless Searches

I guess they are technically not an ISP - they are my online/offsite backup provider ...

But they have maintained a "warrant canary" for years:

http://www.rsync.net/resources/notices/canary.txt

I don't know how effective it would really be if push really came to shove, although it's difficult to imagine a court upholding a LEA coercing them to make public false statements ... the point is, someone is pushing back.

Privacy

Proposed Canadian Law Would Allow Warrantless Searches 195

Posted by timothy
from the rifling-through-america's-storage-unit dept.
An anonymous reader writes "A bill introduced by Canada's Minister of Public Safety will allow police to (warrantlessly) force ISPs to provide access to any requested digital traffic records, reports News 1130. Police lobbied for the bill as means of 'combatting gangsters, pedophiles, or terrorists,' but apparently they find the legal principles of judicial review and probable cause, as well as a constitutional provision against 'unreasonable search or seizure', to be too much of a hassle, and would rather be able to search anyone's web or e-mail traffic at their own discretion and without any oversight. All in the name of public safety, of course."

Slowly and surely the unix crept up on the Nintendo user ...

Working...