Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Not to be too pedantic (Score 1) 631

by ehintz (#38299126) Attached to: <em>MythBusters</em> Bust House

Furthermore, there was another episode some time back, where they were launching a bowling ball from some sort of contraption, and it did precisely that. They wandered around in the brush on the the other side for awhile until they found it. Which makes nobody thinking of this possibility even more surprising.

Comment: Re:You think the housing collapse was bad (Score 1) 917

by ehintz (#37784828) Attached to: US Student Loans Exceed $1 Trillion

The only way to get out is if - God forbids - you get permanently disabled or some other horrific event of that magnitude.

Or just move abroad. Debt is linked to your US social security number, which no one outside the US will ever ask you for. I've met a great deal of Americans who moved to Europe or Asia and then decided to walk away from tens of thousands of dollars of debt, and I recently read an article (can't find the link, sorry) that now there's a rising trend of moving abroad to teach English just to escape creditors.

Irony: it happens in both directions. Here in New Zealand we have a state sponsored student loan system, where repayments are actually automagically pulled from your salary. We also have a lot of brain drain. Students graduate with a pile of debt, and bugger off to AU, US, UK, EU... Never to return. It would interesting to find out how the numbers even out. Certainly the US has profited from Kiwis (and I suppose possibly Aussies) doing this. And NZ has profited from US folks doing it. Would be a good statistic to try and collect, tho probably pretty difficult.

Comment: Re:Stallman and FOSS (Score 1) 1452

by ehintz (#37673720) Attached to: Richard Stallman's Dissenting View of Steve Jobs

Actually, nothing much changed between the BlueBox Jobs and the iThing Jobs. Jobs was always first and foremost a sales guy for The Steve Jobs Ego. What he was selling along with that primary product certainly changed over the years (and there were some very good products in there along with some horrendously bad), but his own ego stroking remained pretty constant throughout. He'd quite happily flip-flop once he discovered his current pet project was a failure and suddenly he'd be a big driver for stuff he'd tried to steamroll previously. And he certainly had no issue with taking credit for others accomplishments when it suited promotion of The Steve Jobs Ego.

Comment: Heh, welcome to the new world order bud (Score 1) 425

by ehintz (#37437098) Attached to: Why Star Wars Should be Left o the Fans

>Lucas is quoted on the Save Star Wars website as saying in a 1997 interview with American Cinematographer magazine that he thought "the other versions will
>disappear". He said: "Even the 35 million [video] tapes out there wont last more than 30 or 40 years. A hundred years from now, the only version of the movie that
>anyone will remember will be the [Special Edition] version."

Well... Not quite. See, that laserdisc edit got bittorrented. Thus, I've got a copy of the original 3 from those laserdisc rips, and I'm damn sure not the only one. The genie is outta the bottle there George, and you won't be getting it back in. My video cassettes will certainly moulder into dust but those laserdisc rips will be on the torrentz (or whatever p2p becomes popular in coming decades) long after I'm pushing up daisies.

Comment: Re:A pyrrhic victory for copyright trolls in NZ? (Score 1) 384

by ehintz (#37415224) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: Low-Cost Tools To Track Employees' Web Use?

Heh. Yeah, I've long been of the opinion that if you have to spend a lot of time policing your employees, your problem is your employees. You need to hire people that you don't need to babysit. If they're not meeting work expectations, stopping them from getting to Facebook only means they're gonna go stand around the water cooler and waste time there, or take the newspaper to the toilet, or whatever. People misusing the company interwebs is an HR problem which requires an HR solution, not a technical one requiring a technical solution.

With you on the new law there. I suspect that the relatively good side of this (making life harder on the extortion/phishing expeditions) was probably incompetence on the part of the rights holders, and perhaps a little bit of creative lemonade-from-lemons by the ISP types who were able to get some input in the short period they had to do so.

Comment: Re:Yeah, here's a winner: (Score 2) 384

by ehintz (#37413436) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: Low-Cost Tools To Track Employees' Web Use?

Actually, we pretty much got screwed here. Quite a lot like PATRIOT got jammed through in the post 911 environment, actually. National figured out they had a wonderful opportunity with the CHC earthquakes and used the state of emergency powers (intended to streamline govt during those sorts of situations and respond as required to real emergencies) and instead rammed through unpopular stuff. They tried to put through another copyright bill about 3-odd years ago but it went through the normal review process, and the protest machine got going and neutered the worst of it. This time around they used the state of emergency powers to push it through with so little time that effective protests simply weren't possible.

Naturally the best solution now would be to vote the bastards out, but we still suffer from the same problem the US does, apathy looks likely to rule the day in this November's election.

Amusingly enough, the new law has one ironic effect. Before, infringement notices to ISPs generally got passed on to the offending user with a don't-be-bad note. The new law has a provision that the ISP has the right to charge for the time this takes them to research. In most cases this now means the ISP, upon receiving the infringement notice, turns around and invoices the complainant $25 before going any further (and as the complainants are usually mostly automated scripts, it mostly seems to end there). Ironically enough, at least in the short term, it probably means *less* punters getting infringement notices, and more costs to the "rights holders" for pursuing the process. In some ways a bit of a phyrric victory.

Comment: Re:Let's not forget ... (Score 1) 207

by ehintz (#37215724) Attached to: The Press Reacts To Steve Jobs' Departure &mdash; in 1985

Truth.

Jobs was very proud, when he came back, about how he simplified the stupidly complex product line (mainly Performas) into the nice G3 beige boxen. As an employee at the time I sat through countless presos extolling this great accomplishment. Always annoyed me that he took personal credit for that, when it was all Amelio's doing (the G3s were already on the production line when Jobs came back). And never forget that he got his start in the biz by shamelessly manipulating the Woz once he figured out he wasn't technically capable of designing Breakout.

He's certainly done good things for Apple in his second coming, but the guy is hardly the great genius many seem to think he is. Just a very shrewd operator and opportunist who was in the right place a lot of times and capitalized on it (and yes-he did have a good knack for surrounding himself with genius-types to make things happen, credit where credit is due).

Say something you'll be sorry for, I love receiving apologies.

Working...