While most people will have no idea what you are talking about, the issue here is that there are "employment taxes" that are paid on a hidden side of your paycheck that covers social security and medicare that an employer needs to cover. These are the employer side of of the "payroll taxes". I agree that these should all be displayed on paychecks--100% of the cost that an employer is covering should be on the paycheck, taxable or not, simply so that an employee can understand what their benefits are and how much the company is paying to employ them. This should include if they provide lunch, snacks, etc. Nothing should be hidden--all costs for an employee's benefits should to the best of the companies ability be shown on a paycheck.
The problem isn't that they are crappy presentations. It is how they are being TAUGHT to present. Sales people are intentionally leaving out information and glossing over facts, because facts can lose a deal. Oh, there are some major cases that some piece of software doesn't handle? Don't present that, that goes in a footnote in the readme file tucked away somewhere. Presentations where products are concerned are drafted and built to never EVER loose a customer, only convince people that the product is the best thing since sliced bread. They are designed to not raise questions, or inform beyond a simplified message. The product isn't the issue--it is how people are being trained to use it, and changing the way a message is presented won't change the message.
the GTX 980 was doing 90 fps without 2 years of optimization while the PS4 is now doing 60fps. Now, they are extrapolating the 60fps to 120fps for VR. From the article:
"But now Showdown can run flawlessly at 60 FPS on Sony’s Morpheus headset for PS4, says J.J. Hoesing, Senior Engine Programmer on Epic’s VR Team. The demo of course takes advantage of Sony’s ‘asynchronous reprojection’ technique to ultimately output at 120 FPS."
Translation: Two eyes means two frames, so you get 120fps from 60fps. Right?
I would agree that this is very much the more interesting point, that if you have turned off the antennas, it is still listening. NSA, is this a feature for you?
The opposite has also been observed (http://gizmodo.com/the-secret-to-weight-loss-might-be-poop-transplants-fro-1265888152). As someone who is married to someone who has struggled with her weight for all her life, and has done everything including a strict 1000 calorie diet with very little results, I KNOW there is more to it than "just don't eat as much". The people that don't have the issue or haven't lived with it don't understand the issue, and assume that "it is their fault".
I'm currently in the process of building a company, and have the advantage of utilizing student labor as part of the development process. How I handled this was that I actually developed a template but static HTML website that provided the UI that I wanted. I then NEXT developed the "help page" for the UI, to explain how the interface worked in great detail. What I found vs. prior development was that be specifying how the UI should work from the user's perspective, things worked well. The things that broke were where my help documentation wasn't accurate enough. Develop your user documentation first, and the visual UI, and you may find the developers can figure out things from there.
You do know that this was about system administration and not access to user accounts, and it was the LACK of two factor on a system that resulted in a hole. This actually supports the assertion that everybody should be using it.
tbh, you have two choices for batteries today: Charge them fast, and they don't last as long, or charge them slow, and they last forever. Heat is the problem the batteries have. If you charge them just fast enough so that in the morning they are full, or at least they never get hot, you are going to do well. The difference that a Scandinavian country imposes is hardly likely to make a difference, due to the phone being in a pocket, your hand, or indoors while charging.
The other idea is to buy a phone with fewer features, but has a long battery life. OnePlus One? Yep, works for me for 2 days at a time, but I charge it each day. I never have an issue where I have to charge it during a single day.
based on my experience, the #1 power consumer is... a bad cell signal. If you are at 92% after 8 hours on ANY phone, you are likely sitting in a building with a cell tower a few feet from your head, or you are just straight up lying about your power usage (or both). I've taken a few last-gen phones, put them on airplane mode, then powered up wifi, and they can last over a week. What burns the battery? mobile data access, and the screen.
Once any system handles Pitt well, they have won the map issue. As someone who lives in the city, I can say that nobody has won the city. Google is close, but they have not won.
Every person participating in an ESPP program or with stock option income will have to do it. That is a fair number of people. That is also why they are doing it...
In the area I live in, we have a utility of power generation and a separate utility power supply. On our power bill, we have the power supply charging for the utility of bring the power to us. This includes maintenance of the poles that carry any of the rest of the utilities, but each have their own height on the pole they are allowed to use. As such, the power supply company maintains for example a high strength wire at the top of the poles, so that a tree is unlikely to hit the lines below it (often we have trees leaning against it until they take care of the problem). Then the power lines are strung below this line, then the Comcast cables, the FIOS runs, etc. The all are on a single pole, but a single player is responsible for maintaining the infrastructure itself.
Ferguson is not a good example because the police officer did NOT know that anything had happened at the convenience store, however the fact that the event had happened was likely why he behaved as he did when confronted by the police officer.
The question is if replacing the fleet would have triggered production based pollution that offset any gains. Making new cars isn't a pollution free activity after all. The net result may have been a reduction in worldwide pollution instead.
I'm not sure you are aware, but crime rate has fallen across the world, even in countries that never went through a "get tough on crime". One plausible theory (I won't say it is correct, just possible) is that Lead poisoning in youth resulted in criminal tendencies later (http://www.forbes.com/sites/alexknapp/2013/01/03/how-lead-caused-americas-violent-crime-epidemic/). Attributing to the incarceration the reduction in crime though is a pretty tough sell, in particular when you look at crime statistics of juvenile offenders who's father is incarcerated: http://www.scholarsstrategynetwork.org/sites/default/files/ssn_basic_facts_swisher_on_children_of_the_incarcerated.pdf.