Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: pictures (Score 1) 560

by dualmoo (#16540352) Attached to: Wikipedia's $100 Million Dream
wikipedia doesn't need books because hosting books is not its purpose. however it needs lots of multimedia contents to illustrate its articles, and most importantly, pictures. there are many excellent historical pictures that are still copyrighted. for example i find it sad that there are no pictures associated to the pulitzer prize article, for obvious reasons. i think that getting the copyright of a good archive of well-known pictures would be a great enhancement to wikipedia

The more I want to get something done, the less I call it work. -- Richard Bach, "Illusions"

Working...