Comment: Venus who? (Score 1) 60
Comment: Has anyone else noticed,...? (Score 3, Funny) 201
Comment: Re:The ocean frontier - not (Score 1) 138
Comment: Not in US custody (Score 5, Informative) 439
Comment: Obligatory (Score 3, Funny) 104
Comment: Re:This is being whitewashed from the white house (Score 2) 197
Comment: No difference (Score 2) 110
I have not noticed any difference in total international traffic at the ISP which I run between now and before the new law came into force. I do notice more VPN and seedbox traffic on residential connections and less UDP torrent traffic.
I am also yet to see a copyright infringement notice properly formatted with the requirements of the new legislation. I have bot even received an automated form letter from a rights owner, as used to be the case on a regular basis.
No rightsowner, or agent thereof has been in contact, nor RIANZ or NZFACT to discuss the relationship between the rightsowners and the designated IPAPs.
Comment: Pretty Quiet (Score 1) 329
Comment: Re:Solved this before (Score 1) 251
Comment: Compact (Score 2) 197
Comment: This is easy to take down (Score 1) 583
Comment: Only 15 minutes (Score 1) 206
Comment: Too late (Score 1) 223
Comment: Revenue Stream (Score 5, Insightful) 386
The movie grossed $103 million at the US box office
Assuming a movie ticket price of $20, this means that 5.3 million people saw the movie in theatres. These guys are suing 23222 people, or about 230 times fewer
At $150K per defendant, the potential works out to $3.48billion or roughly 33 times the US gross (and $700million more than the highest grossing movie ever - Avatar
My business pitch to the movie studios would be: "Straight to torrent then litigate - that's where the money is..."