Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system


Forgot your password?

Submission Summary: 0 pending, 7 declined, 1 accepted (8 total, 12.50% accepted)

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


+ - Pastafarian Rally physically attacked by Moscow police, 8 arrested->

Submitted by drfuchs
drfuchs (599179) writes "`Glorification of the Great Flying Spaghetti Monster offends [our] religious feelings [which is against the law]' explained the leader of a Russian Orthodox group that joined in the melee. The Huffington Post has a `video show[ing] members of the police chasing Pastafarians through the streets, who can be recognized by the strainers on their heads.' Not to mention their otherwise generally nerdy appearance."
Link to Original Source

+ - Netflix sorry it messed up; then makes it worse->

Submitted by drfuchs
drfuchs (599179) writes "Reed Hastings writes to Netflix subscribers that he's very sorry, and to show his contrition he's going to make things even worse! No price-rise rollback; just a jettisoning of the DVD mailing into a different business entity: "Qwikster". No shared queue, no shared website. I think he's lost his marbles."
Link to Original Source

+ - Non-compete clauses out in California; USA next?

Submitted by drfuchs
drfuchs (599179) writes "The non-competition clause in that employment agreement you signed is null & (void*), says the state Supreme Court of California. Better still, the San Francisco Chronicle opines that the US Federal courts are likely to fall in line with the decision. Turns out it wasn't a high-tech case at all; just a CPA who had worked for the accounting firm Arthur Anderson (now-disgraced due to their complicity in the Enron case).

Glad we've got that cleared up after all these decades."
The Media

+ - The Frakking Paradox 2

Submitted by drfuchs
drfuchs (599179) writes "Scientists at the CDC say that US medians for age 20-59 heterosexual activity are 6.8 partners for males, and only 3.7 for females . The press is widely reporting this, with headlines like "Men More Promiscuous", "Men Have More Sex Partners", etc. It seems to fit what we've all heard and experienced, and is generally held to be common knowledge.

But lets do the math: Each heterosexual act involves one male and one female. If it's their first encounter with one-another, then
{total_num_male_partners_that_females_have_had++; total_num_female_partners_that_males_have_had++;}
Clearly, the two totals are equal. We also know that the US has about the same number of males as females in the 20-59 age range. Calculating the average number of partners for males and females, we have the same numerators and same denominators, so there's no way around the fact that the average number of heterosexual partners for males must equal that for females.

So, that's "The Frakking Paradox." Explanations I've considered but ruled out:
  1. Guys are frakking lots of females during overseas vacations (but then they'd pretty much be dead, according to current cinema, and not be able to participate in the survey)
  2. Guys are frakking lots of female aliens who are visiting terrestrially (but wouldn't the male aliens come on a visit, too?)
  3. Guys are frakking lots of female aliens during an abduction (being probed would probably interfere, but then again, who knows?)
  4. US females change their clothes, cosmetics, hair, and even have surgery; but US males are so stupid, they think she's a new partner, while the females realizes it's the same old slob of a guy in the same pair of jeans as always. (Nah, if he's that much of a jerk, she's liable to take him out of the running permanently, if you catch my jist, which would then skew the results in the wrong direction.)
  5. There's something that males and females can do together that the male counts as having had a sex partner, but not the female. But if this were possible, then slashdot readers wouldn't be such a sorry lot. (Note that the wording of the original poll seems to rule out various asymmetries you might be getting your hopes up for.)
  6. They measured the "median", not the "average". But this only helps if there are many, many more females than males who have a wildly high number of partners. Even considering prostitution, you'd have to have almost all males going to about four different prostitutes each, and very few males going to many of them.
  7. Guys are frakking lots of females who are outside the 20-59 age range. This seems impossible given the rest of the data (age of first sexual encounter; median number of partners for 50+ females), and the relative rarity of google hits on "GMILF".
  8. Lots of people are fibbing big-time. But the study authors went to all sorts of trouble creating an environment that's supposed to avoid this sort of trouble ("Audio Computer-Assisted Self-Interview ... to allow respondents to answer questions in complete privacy").
  9. Lots of people are self-deluding. But we're talking an almost 2-to-1 discrepancy here...
Any bright frakking ideas out there?"

There are three kinds of people: men, women, and unix.