Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


Comment: Re:Move more, eat less (Score 1) 493

by dr_canak (#49328421) Attached to: Hacking Weight Loss: What I Learned Losing 30 Pounds

It works because there is a lag in the time you are satiated to the time your stomach tells your brain you are satiated.

People consume far more calories than they really need, very early in a meal. Many, if not most people, will eat to a feeling of "fullness". That feeling is a somatic feeling.

The nerve signal to your brain, saying you have enough calories for energy now, can arrive to your brain some 15-20 minutes after you begin to eat, even if you've consumed more than enough calories to get through.

Eating slowly gives your brain time to catch up to your gut, and hence when you arrive at your caloric needs, your brain can tell you that you have had enough. This feeling of "fullness" is nervous system fullness, not the somatic "fullness" people think about when they think of feeling "full".

Drinking water doesn't help with calories per se, but it does give the person the "feeling" of being full (somatic), and can help slow eating down until the brain catches up. Same thing with eating slow, and putting your utensils down between bites.

Comment: Re:Yes. It will. (Score 2) 146

by dr_canak (#49121423) Attached to: 18 Months On, Grand Theft Auto V's Mount Chiliad Mystery Remains Unsolved

Not sure how this is rated as +5 "Insightful". I to had not heard of "PewdiePie", but something called "Google" and "Wikipedia" tells me that he is quite the online celebrity, with an estimated net worth of $12,000,000 (yes, that's 12 Million dollars). You might think he's a "douchebag", and maybe he is a "douchebag", but his "douchbaggery" could buy and sell yours many times over.

Comment: Re:But ... but ... gas is below 2 bucks man! (Score 1) 168

by dr_canak (#48747063) Attached to: Seismological Society of America Claims Fracking Reactivated Ohio Fault

You are partially correct,

that the Middle East doesn't set prices, but Saudi Arabia has increased output:

and many analysts believe the increase in production is to make the price of other extraction technologies unprofitable. They may become profitable again, but when fuel prices are this cheap, it makes it difficult.

Comment: Re:Why are you a corporate shill? (Score 1) 111

by dr_canak (#48414391) Attached to: Interviews: Ask Malcolm Gladwell a Question

'..Why did you..."

because he's an idiot. And one of the most overrated, over-hyped idiots of the last 20+ years. It's hard to think of anyone who comes to mind even comparable.

Gladwell has a gift to take something that *easily* can be explained in a few pages, and turn it into an entire book, full of the same repetitive idea, chapter after chapter.

How he has become so popular is beyond me. The only thing I can guess is that he deludes people into thinking they are smarter for reading his stuff. I read a couple of his books and immediately saw him for what he was.

And really, why is this even a Slashdot interview?

Comment: An interesting caveat (Score 5, Insightful) 216

by dr_canak (#47185901) Attached to: $57,000 Payout For Woman Charged With Wiretapping After Filming Cops

" settled Thursday in a move that the woman's attorney speculated would deter future police "retaliation." ... "

But then this:

"...that she was "exercising a clearly established First Amendment right when she attempted to film the traffic stop in the absence of a police order to stop filming or leave the area."

Seems to imply that if the police had ordered her to stop filming or leave the area, then she could have been arrested had she continued.

So really, doesn't this just mean that Police will now simply order people to stop filming or leave the area in order to end the filming?

Comment: Re:Offensive (Score 1) 622

by dr_canak (#41970265) Attached to: With NCLB Waiver, Virginia Sorts Kids' Scores By Race


let me fix this for you:

[edited for clarity]
"Passing should be the same for everyone. How long did we have racial profiling laws that made it impossible for equality to exist? Now, in one move, Virginia wants to completely defeat that. If they are going to profile kids based off their race, do they also seat kids based off their skin color; black kids at the back, Asians at the front so they can answer the question more easily, whites in the middle to be forgotten, with Hispanic students seated where ever? This is the same idea, just a different spin. This entire concept is offensive and unethical."

Good thing you are a black, disabled student. Otherwise you would not pass your writing test in Virginia. Feel free to graduate and move on.

Comment: Re:Whats the difference... (Score 1) 486

by dr_canak (#40616043) Attached to: Hackers Steal Keyless BMW In Under 3 Minutes

But those numbers do not appear to be adjusted for inflation, which you have to take into account when making comparisons like you are. In 1990, the median income was around $49,000, in inflation adjusted dollars. In 2010, it was also just a tad under $49,000.

take care,

Comment: Re:Without remorse there is no rehabilitation. (Score 1) 161

by dr_canak (#37380006) Attached to: Kevin Mitnick Answers

While i agree he likely didn't cause "some of the most ammoral and harmful acts in modern computing history", when you say this, "he didn't really damage much of anything" who then is he aplogizing to?

"However, I do regret the effects that my activities had on my family and the companies that were damaged by my actions."


Comment: Interesting presentation on TED re: Child Safety (Score 3, Informative) 493

by dr_canak (#36837950) Attached to: Can a Playground Be Too Safe?

Came across this TED presentation last year:

Definitely an interesting take on this whole issue of child safety regulations. The book (written by the presenter in the video above, Gever Tully) entitled "50 Dangerous Things (You should let your kids do)" is a really nice read.


Comment: Re:Kinda (Score 1) 456

by dr_canak (#33076112) Attached to: Man Wants to Donate His Heart Before He Dies

While I certainly understand the sentiment, the issue here is that this person cannot end their own life. They require, are requesting in fact, that someone end their life for them.

So, one could make the argument that someone should be free to do what they want with their body, provided what they do doesn't impinge on the lives of others. On the other hand, no one is obligated to honor this individual's request, simply because this individual wants to exercise control over his own body.


Comment: Another outstanding reference for R: "R in Action" (Score 3, Informative) 91

by dr_canak (#32954044) Attached to: R In a Nutshell

Not having read the O' Reilly book,

I can't draw a comparison between the two, but I have been extremely pleased with "R In Action" by Robert Kabacoff

and it can be found here:

It's a work in progress, in that some 90% of the book is written. Pre-ordering the electronic version gives you the ability to download chapters as they are written, plus a final e-copy (or hard copy if you pay more) when it's completed.

I have a high degree of familiarity with SPSS and SAS, and am learning R to get around the crazy licensing issues of the aforementioned programs. I have been very pleased with Kabacoff's book, as I had *no* familiarity with R before grabbing "R in Action." The publisher/author support a forum where purchasers can identify errors and/or make suggestions for improvements before the book goes to final press.

Not sure if it is competition for "R in a Nutshell" or simply an additional reference, but worth checking out if you want to learn R. It's been very helpful for me.


Comment: Re:Bluff City is south of Bristol Motor Speedway (Score 4, Informative) 680

by dr_canak (#32497532) Attached to: Anti-Speed Camera Activist Buys Police Department's Web Domain

Having been to Bluff City and the Bristol race for many years now,

I can assure you that during race weekend a car goes anything but fast. The traffic in and out of the track is brutal, starting Friday and going well into Monday. 6+ hours before the race, traffic is already backed up for several miles, in both directions. After the race, it can take several hours to get out of Bluff City and be on your way. There are about 500 police officers (local, county and state) and a squad car about every 500 feet for a good mile in each direction because the pedestrian traffic is so heavy. I've arrived at the track 6 hours prior to the green flag and have parked 2+ miles away and walked, just because the traffic so obnoxious.

These camera's in Bluff City have very little to do with Nascar, and I would imagine speeding tickets on race weekend generate but a tiny fraction of the revenue these cameras otherwise generate.


Comment: Re:Already done (Score 1) 89

by dr_canak (#32137592) Attached to: Wikipedia Offers a Book Creator

I'm not necessarily condoning their business model,

But in two of the first four links from what you posted, there is a direct mention in the "Editorial Reviews" specifically stating that the content is from Wikipedia articles. Of course, the value of this "disclaimer" is predicated on the purchaser seeing that and still making a choice to purchase one of these titles, which may or may not be happening. And it doesn't appear to be there for all titles. But it is there for some.


"Life sucks, but it's better than the alternative." -- Peter da Silva