Uhhh, dude... all but one of the 9/11 Hijackers flew first or business class (mostly first) on their various flights.

• AA 11
• United 175
• AA 77
• United 93

It's not just that there are 7000+ districts, but they all have their own rules. Back in 2010, Washington had an extra tax on candy. However, Kit-Kat bars were exempt and charged at a normal food tax rate. Why? Because they happened to contain flour and were considered a baked good. Imagine trying to handle thousands of different jurisdictional rules across the millions of products Amazon carries. It'd be insane!

All of the water in Seattle comes from 2 mountain rivers.

And they have many subsidiaries including:

• Amazon Services LLC
• Amazon Digital Services, Inc.
• Amazon Web Services, Inc.
• Amazon EU SÃrl
• Amazon Europe Holding Technologies SCS
• Amazon Fulfillment Services, Inc.
• Amazon Services International, Inc.
• Amazon Corporate LLC
• Amazon Technologies, Inc.

which all use the term "Amazon" without the ".com".

Sorry, but having seen the former permenant collection, I was incredibly disappointed at the temporary "Icons" exhibit. It's nowhere close to the original in scale or impact. It takes up only about a quarter of the space the other one did (when I was there, the part that used to have robots had a horror exhbit and they redid the wall so you can't even get to the part with the cool weapons and all the old pulp mags, let alone where the death star used to be). It's also way less dense, and has almost none of the literature scattered around that the old one used to.

There was an incredibly relevant article[1] in Analog Science Fiction & Fact recently. The basic premise is that it's not just smaller research telescopes that are valuable - in astronomy, even amateur observations are incredibly valuable (often because they happen to notice things the bigger telescopes aren't pointed at). The author details a large number of findings that are rooted in observations by amateurs.

Mr. Olusevi shouldn't limit himself to just $30,000 research telescopes. He should also be trying to get $300 telescopes in backyards all over Africa.

[1] Plummer, Alan. Atlas' Apprentices: Amateur Contributions in Astronomy and Astrophysics

Actually, yes. The most common format for storing RSA keys is PEM and it looks like this (randomly generated key just for this post):

The base64 data in the middle is a structure that contains a bunch of numbers. The numbers present in a private key are different (a supserset) of a public key, so even if it's in a format that doesn't have the BEGIN..., by parsing the structure, you can see what's in it. (Try pasting the key block above into the stdin of openssl rsa -noout -text.)

Here's their PR team

Boeing's one half of this little venture called "United Space Alliance" which was responsible for every shuttle launch. They're also half of the "United Launch Alliance" which runs all the Delta II, Delta IV and Atlas launches.

How many launches has Boeing performed? Most of them.

The Soyuz has a limited on-orbit lifetime though. After the recent loss of a cargo Soyuz, there was a threat we'd have to abandon the station if the currently docked capsule expired before they could re-certify the platform and launch a replacement mission. Being able to fly a rescue dragon to the station for re-enty could be a posisble way to avoid this in the future by allowing a crew to stay up longer.

That being said, it's of course incredibly unlikely that we'd see such an convergence of event during the short time between the certificiation of Dragon and that of Falcoln that would cause NASA to pay for such a flight. Since I doubt you could even fit much cargo on the passenger version on the empty ride up, it'd be incredibly expensive to do except in the case of extreme emergency.

Without knowing exactly what they did, it's reasonable to assume they searched his car. Generally, this requires a warrant unless it's incident to an arrest, and even then, there are limits.

There's not much legal precentdent either way as to whether or not slight radioactivity consitutes probable cause, but it's a very worrying slippery slope if it does. Cop wants to harras you? All he has to do is put a few drops of some nuclear medicine on your bumper (or worse, on your person) and you'll be stopped and searched thoroughly, just because he thinks you're guilty. Hell, he can just claim you registered, search your car illegally and haul you in for whatever he finds.

TL;DR: It's a slippery slope for due process.

Yes. See the Stored Communication Act (18 USC Â2701 - 2711), and United States v Lifshitz, (369 F3d 173 [2d Cir 2004]).

There's about 150 years of case law that declare that bank records can be subpoenaed with the defendant having no standing to move to quash. It's actually one of the main precedents the judge used in this case to squash the defendant's motion.

While I agree with you, and think the vast majority of the decision is very well reasoned, this quote scares the crap out of me:

If that becomes a set precedent, it will have an incredibly chilling effect on online privacy.

It'd be easy - only one of them would have political convictions that are set in stone.

I can't speak to GE but I work for Amazon and we're hiring like crazy. We have something like 2000 open engineering positions in the US alone, and we pretty much open a new position for every one we fill.

I won't speak to the tax issue, but saying Amazon is no longer a jobs creator is just entirely untrue.