Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Despicable (Score 1) 542

by dlgeek (#39071685) Attached to: School Sends Child's Lunch Home After Determining it Unhealthy
Keep in mind this is North Carolina we're talking about...There aren't any Jews there, and you can't keep kosher because it's impossible to buy kosher meat.

I'm actually serious - that's not too far from where I grew up, and any kosher-keeping family with kids at that school would go to my old synagogue. There were only maybe 2 or 3 families there that would keep milk and meat seperate (I now keep fully Kosher but my parents don't), and none of them would be in More-at-Four.

But, if it happened, I'm sure the sure the parents would let the teacher know, and the teacher wouldn't push. From later, more reliable reports (not from a political newspaper), it sounds like this was nothing more than a teacher or other school official saying "Oh, you don't have any milk? Why don't you go through the line and get some?" which a 4 year old girl misunderstood and a mother and some reporters blew way out of proportion. It's not like they were forcing her in the way the original article alleged, and they certainly wouldn't push if the parent had previously informed them of a relgious diet, just as if they parent had informed them the child was lactose intolerent (which is far more likely than being a kosher-keeping Jew).

Comment: Re:Despicable (Score 1) 542

by dlgeek (#39071205) Attached to: School Sends Child's Lunch Home After Determining it Unhealthy
My mother is a county preschool administrator in NC and part of her responsibilities include overseeing the Moore at Four program in her county.

She has an undergraduate degree, masters degree, and had about around 15 years of experience as a classroom teacher before she became an administrator. As far as I am aware, all of her staff are college-educated, and I know for a fact they've all had a myraid of mandatory trainings and certifications. These are not uneducated people.

Comment: Re:Patents should promote innovation (Score 1) 248

by dlgeek (#39012699) Attached to: A Defense of Process Patents

Example: Suppose you want to patent RSA encryption

You mean like U.S. Patent 4,405,829 which was issued to Rivest, Shamir and Adleman and was enfoced requiring RSA implementations to be licensed until shortly before it expired in 2000? There's a reason PGP used El-Gamal and DSA for a long time without supporting RSA keys.

Comment: Re:Take the fuel.. (Score 1) 416

by dlgeek (#38765626) Attached to: What To Do With a 1,000 Foot Wrecked Cruise Ship?
Asbestos isn't really a problem when submerged. Its risks come due to tiny particles becoming airborne and getting stuck in the lung where they're an irritant. Underwater, it just clumps, and fish don't have lungs to irritate.

In fact, the standard protocol when dealing with asbestos (removal, etc). is to cover it with water. The EPA also had no problem with asbestos-filled subway cars into artificial reefs

Comment: Re:And how can I use it on my BIND server? (Score 0) 165

by dlgeek (#38660610) Attached to: Comcast DNSSEC Goes Live

There is no certificate authority involved, as the DNS hierarchy contains the signature chain, from the root servers, to each TLD, to each domain. One proposed use of DNSSEC is to publish an SSL certificate public key -- then no Certificate Authorities are required! A browser can use the DNSSEC validated response to match the public key (or more likely, fingerprint) to the web server it is connecting with. You can already use DNS to publish SSH key fingerprints, now you can sign that record for even more trust.

Ostensibly, CAs validate more than ownership of a domain - they're supposed to tie a legal entity to the website, in order to prevent bankofarmerica.com from MITMing your connection to your bank. You should theoretically check that the entity is the one you expect - headquarter in such and such state, etc. Realistically, no one did, and so now we have EV certs to try to make that more visible. Where we go from here is another question....

TL;DR: CAs are supposed to speak to more than just domain ownership.

Comment: Re:Added burden for small businesses :( (Score 1) 413

by dlgeek (#38659916) Attached to: Amazon To Collect Indiana Sales Tax In 2014
Sorry - that should have been 50,000+ in terms of rate jurisdictions. 5000 is filing jurisdictions (counties)

Storing a number is fine. Keeping current about what products are taxed at what rates in all 50,000 is hard, especially given hundreds of thousands of items sold (Amazon). Filing quarterly tax returns in 5000 different jurisdictions, each of which has to be prepared and reviewed by accountants and lawyers is very, very expensive.

Comment: Re:Added burden for small businesses :( (Score 1) 413

by dlgeek (#38659672) Attached to: Amazon To Collect Indiana Sales Tax In 2014

Any online company selling outside of its state would have to keep track of potentially 50 times as many different sales taxes (not all states have sales tax, I am aware)

50? Ha! Try 5000+! Not only can sales tax be imposed by the state, it can be imposed by:

  • Counties
  • Towns
  • Municipal Areas (think a city and it's suburbs)
  • Local/Regional Transit Districts
  • Fire Districts
  • Water Conservation Districts
  • Etc.

There are places where different tax rates depend not only on which side of the street you're on, but whether you're on the north side of the street to the east or west of the intersection with another major street, except for the 5000 block. I'm not kidding, although I wish I was.

Then, you have to figure out what rate to charge various items at, for every state. Food is taxed at different rates in many states, but what qualifies as food? In Washington, up until recently, a Kit-Kat bar was taxed at a different rate than a Snickers bar (apparently one was candy, and one was somehow a baked desert). Now you have to figure out and track different tax rates for every jurisdiction for every item you carry.

Not only that, but in some states, companies have to file separate tax paperwork with every county, detailing all their sales broken down by district. For a small internet retailer, this means that almost EVERY new customer means an extra tax filing and the fees to the accountants and lawyers that go with it.

A requirement to collect local sales tax for internet retailers is COMPLETELY unfair and a huge burden for companies, regardless of whether they are small mom-and-pops or the size of Amazon.com.

Comment: Re:Will GoDaddy refund registrations paid in advan (Score 1) 279

by dlgeek (#38527012) Attached to: Imgur.com: Why We Dumped GoDaddy
That's how all transfers work - the transfer fee is the extension cost for the next year.

ICANN "Policy on Transfer of Registrations between Registrars"

8. Effect on Term of Registration
The completion by Registry Operator of a holder-authorized transfer under this Part A shall result in a one-year extension of the existing registration, provided that in no event shall the total unexpired term of a registration exceed ten (10) years.

Whenever I feel like exercise, I lie down until the feeling passes.

Working...