Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter


Forgot your password?

Comment Re:sega channel (Score 1) 75 75

That could work but the period of time before rotating titles would need to be greatly increased because games take waaaaaay longer to beat nowadays than back in the Sega Genesis era. For example, you could blaze through Sonic the Hedgehog in maybe an hour or less but even modern platformers have a 10+ hour play time before completion (unless you are speed-running or insanely good at the game).

Sony's current pricing scheme is not going to work as it's just way too much for little time. Hopefully the excess is just to fund the project and complete development and NOT the final rates (much like the game which costs $75 for early access although I cannot remember its title off-hand).

Comment Wow! Me too!! (Score 1) 109 109

This story is REALLY uncanny because I am about the do the same thing only in my case, it's not just for the Oculus but everything in general. For example, I like 3D movies a lot but it's a pain either choosing between blurred vision or wearing TWO sets of glasses on my face obscuring the quality of the image in the process. Also, certain headphones are a royal pain to wear as they push the arms of the glasses into my cheek which can get rather painful after a while. Just $2200 though? Mine will be more than that but I guess it depends on where this person is getting it done and how bad their eyes are.

Comment Great idea. (Score 1) 139 139

I like this idea as some apps are deceptive in that they appear free but are really not due to micro transactions. Others are also labelled as "free" when they are really just shareware that requires a purchase to unlock all the functions. Apple should really follow suit as the same problem exists in that app store too.

I always liked the notion of having a feature complete free version that is Ad supported only and then a paid one that is ad free rather than micro-transactions but that's just me.

Comment Re:It's not free (Score 1) 212 212

Not Valve games but there's also "Planetside 2" (run by Sony of all companies) and Firefall (the latter showing a whole lot of potential once it gets out of its beta stage).

The only concern I have about free-to-play is that the majority of titles are multi-player (usually MMO) only. I've seen very few "Single Player" F2P titles that aren't just demos in disguise. There are exceptions though such as "Plants Vs Zombies 2" which can be played all the way through without paying (unless you REALLY want access to the optional premium plants).

Comment Re:There isn't even a proper Nintendo 64 emulator. (Score 1) 227 227

"Barely even a proper *SNES* emulator".

Not true. Take a look a bsnes (now merged into hijan). It's a cycle accurate SNES emulator with 100% compatibility. Currently a similar emulator but for N64 is being made called CEN64 (still in early development at the moment).

Comment Re:Postal 2 (Score 1) 94 94

Didn't always work out for me. Sometimes the line in Postal 2 would get horrendously jammed up and wouldn't progress until I reloaded my save file (the church was the worst for this since the hallway is so narrow).

Hopefully the mechanics of a moving line is better in this game since that is the primary focus of it.

Comment They don't compare. (Score 1) 348 348

I do not see how the Steam Box will compare with the Xbox One and PS4 any more than the PC itself as the Steam box is exactly that only it will have a lower price than many gaming PC's, use Linux, be mod-friendly, and be tailored towards connecting to your home theatre setup while also trying to revamp the paradigms of controller design (I especially hope that works out as well). What this MAY do is encourage more developers to create Linux ports which isn't as common as it could be. I just hope this does not turn out to be another Ouya scenario with a relatively low selection of upcoming noteworthy titles.

Comment Pretty cool. (Score 1) 77 77

Tried the demo and it's actually pretty surreal being able to play a game like that in a web browser. I hope the technology improves further as time passes. One issue is that it cannot capture the mouse in fullscreen meaning you have to click in order to turn the camera. This would be a big problem playing windowed of course but in full screen, it's more intuitive just to move the mouse to turn around (like every FPS has implemented).

Comment Re:Har`first (Score 1) 99 99

They really over-did it with Ezio. He was cool at first but didn't need three entire games dedicated to him. I too felt like Revelations was just a re-hash of Brotherhood.

Far Cry 3: Blood Dragon on the other hand looks nothing like Far Cry 3 other than the name. It seems like a completely different game running off the same engine and that's it.

Comment Why I use adblock... (Score 1) 978 978

So here is my take on the matter. I fully understand that numerous websites such as Destructoid provide a lot of free (quality) content to viewers yet their servers come with increasing operation costs and therefore, ad revenue is a necessity to keep the site running without demanding a premium charge first. The same goes for several other websites. The problem is that I have encountered way too many highly abusive ads that I came to the point where I didn't WANT to shut adblock off nor do I want to go fishing through each site I visit and only enable adblock manually when they go overboard. I would rather preventative measures instead.

Point in case. I was at my brother's place and he needed help installing a Minecraft mod. I went to its download page and was bombarded with at least 5 gigantic download buttons and guess what? All of them were fake and were placed as a trap in order to get a free ad click from anyone who just wanted to download the mod. That is deceptive! Needless to say, I became very frustrated from being sent all over the place so installed Adblock on his machine soon after. After returning to the page, I eventually found the REAL download link "tucked away" BUT you had to give them a facebook like, tweet, etc just to view it. Don't believe me? See it for yourself and you'll know what I mean:

THIS is the kind of crap that I couldn't stand prior to installing Adblock on my own machine. I've also come across ads that would slow down my machine (due to being a poorly coded flash banner), play obnoxious music, spawn a popup that abuses the unLoadEvent function thereby displaying a dialog box before it will close, or even attempt a browser hijack to change my default search provider or a drive by malware installation. Then there are the video streaming sites like Youtube which throw in half a minute commercials not just at the beginning but sometimes in the MIDDLE of a video as well which ends up being extremely loud compared to the video itself and therefore hurts my ears (I use headphones and yes I know that only partner videos have ads but hopefully you get the point I am making). I am sorry but enough is enough!

It's really nice that Destructoid heavily monitors what advertisers' banners appear but some sites just let it go way out of control and I have no way of knowing this until I hit the site. Therefore, to save myself a LOT of frustration, Adblock is going to have to stay on until the worst of ads are abolished (which does not seem very likely unfortunately). Text ads like what Google uses I could tolerate as well as small non-intrusive banners. In fact, Adblock HAS an option to allow "non-intrusive" ads and this is ON by default. Perhaps more sites should work towards only displaying those and perhaps less ads will be blocked. Only the REAL ad loathers would enable that options as well. Also, there are sites that just flat-out refuse Adblock users by inserting a script to halt all traffic that has it installed. If they really get desperate, they could do that too although I find this approach to be quite hostile.

Comment Redundant. (Score 1) 217 217

To me, Internet capable TV's are kind of redundant. I think it's safe to say that most people who own a TV also have a computer or tablet they can use to browse the Internet.

If you want to push the silliness even further, I used to have a Samsung 27" T27A950 which is a computer monitor that also happens to be "connected" as well. So my first question is why you would use the monitor to access the Internet rather than the computer it is connected to. Granted it can be used as a regular TV as well (even had a port for a coaxial cable) but that is beside the point.

The F-15 Eagle: If it's up, we'll shoot it down. If it's down, we'll blow it up. -- A McDonnel-Douglas ad from a few years ago