Yes, Sartre, we are fully aware that we can always choose to kill ourselves.
Or less hyperbolistically, we can always choose a worse path, like spending another 4 years and the retirement savings to get schooled in a job that pays half as much. Anyone can do that. Show me a better choice.
I can only surmise that you were not speaking to the morality of the choice and by worse you mean less profitable, and by better you mean more profitable.
So as asked, this may be an option that does not require 4 years, a retirement account, and likely will pay better than half as much. You won't even be forced to write high grade malicious code. By some accounts this could be a better choice.
I don't know who makes these decisions for you, but they may force you to attend WGU depending on how much your making now. Or perhaps you make these choices yourself and this was just hyperbole?
This happens with every technology when the barrier to entry is significantly lowered. I'm sure early automobile enthusiasts felt the same way about the Model-T ruining their happy-go-lucky days of driving without licenses.
It was quite dangerous to be near anyone driving at the time. Most did not know how to drive, obviously did not start with the benefit of being an automobile passenger for 15 years, and they tended to think of it as a carriage without the horses and drove them accordingly. Comedy and injury ensued. So probably about the same as drones.
The joys of not controlling what you supposedly own.
Some people wax poetic for yesteryear of scratched CDs and lost keys.
And some don't.
Back in my sat technology days, that would be an average night. It went on like that for years.
Its only news if they break in.
A broad conspiracy to defraud its customers out of hundreds(?) of millions of dollars as well as governments, and you just want the kingpin? Is it because the coders can only do what they are told? So would you say that the good and true engineering of those vehicles was also due to the CEO?
We don't let larcenists off the hook due to size of their tax return, we don't let the get-away driver get-away based on high unemployment rates. The CEO may have commanded this done, but the coders surely pulled the trigger. For years.
As for the plan your suggesting where the execs should be forced to return bonuses, I am sure the board of directors would love that. Even though they could very well have been involved. And the shareholders, they should get those bonuses back even though the shareholders choose the board of directors have enjoyed higher returns based on this likely criminal activity.
I would like to submit the idea that the customers are the victims here and the ones that should be compensated, and that VW the company should be the one to do that. After that, persecute the CEO if it makes you feel better.
Atheists are to blame, they haven't contributed anything to religious hate crimes in years.
In 2012, when asked if he personally uses McAfee anti-virus he replied by saying "I take it off," and that "It's too annoying." - Wikipedia
"Hackers see hacking me as a badge of honor". He added that for his own security he has other people buy his computer equipment for him, uses pseudonyms for setting up computers and logging in, and changes his IP address several times a day. - Wikipedia
So he goes through extraordinary efforts to keep using Windows for no proffitable reason. Seems presidential to me.
Fundamental or muslim extreamists mixing explosives with crowds is not an unknown event (type 'bomb' in google news). Likewise the mixing of drones and bombs is also known (Type in 'US drone strike' in google news). It's easy to understand how someone might get confused and think these could be related in some way and be a little concrened about 'US muslim drone bomb' becoming a valid search some day soon.
Although it might be worth noting that your view and what is really happening are two very seperate issues and its dangerous to mix those two together. So, umm... As you were.
Their users are happier than they were before.
And the rest of them left.
I doubt the poster meant to imply that there was some perfect security involved. I believe the poster just meant that it had not been audited, tested, or fixed to a reasonably acceptable level of security. Alluding to the idea that it does not matter in this core networked service because nothing is secure is counter productive and a bit clueless.
Oh wait, you didn't code for it did you? In that case: The architecture sucks and the implementation took pictures because it likes it like that. Sucky i mean.
Compilers and interpreters have been far too lazy for too long.. It is high time they start doing what we mean, not what we say.
For instance non-addressable memory access could be quietly replaced with the previous memory access. Memory contents flagged as string could be used in any arithmetic using any base because the result is coerced into int 1, so as to always succeed. Recursive loops should just break out at some point so we can keep moving along into... umm, some other code? (-- seems reasonable).
Although, I am starting to think that anyone who means for things like that to happen is surely a dick.
If your giving a presentation, your not going to convey more information by presenting more details. PowerPoint is bad, but not the problem. The fix in all cases is to teach people how to present. It should be taught in school. Once they get comfortable presenting with some skill, they will convey the knowledge and maybe even put some in the documents.
I dont think that view is exclusive to programmers, it could probably apply to any skilled labor profession.
I expect the next one to be on the "?" Shape of myths.
Space is to place as eternity is to time. -- Joseph Joubert