Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter


Forgot your password?
Slashdot Deals: Deal of the Day - 6 month subscription of Pandora One at 46% off. ×

Comment Not irrelevant. Meaningless. You ask a fallacy. (Score 1) 574

Cause I linked (and quoted) a video of him hearing, thinking over and replying to an explicit "MUSLIM-tracking question".
He replied with a YES. Adding that there should be "a lot" of tracking systems, beyond databases.

Which makes your either-or question a deliberate lie. Not just a terribly embarrassingly set up false dichotomy.
I'm getting fremdschamen just thinking of it.

So it's not a question did I hear the actual exchange. The question is are you just a troll, an idiot, delusional or some combination thereof.
Now, to that the answer would be irrelevant. To me.
But you should check that and hope that you're just a dickhead troll. Mental illness is not something to be taken lightly.

Comment Nope again. Now you're just making shit up. (Score 1) 574

I gave you a link to a video where he is explicitly asked should there be a MUSLIM tracking database.
Not refugee, not immigrant, not Bosnian, Syrian, French, Belgian or Vulcan.
He was explicitly asked should there be a religion-based tracking system.
To which he replied yes, expanding it to "a lot of systems".

The "out of context" situation you are imagining never happened. Explicit question - followed by a mindbogglingly retarded answer.

Now... you can prattle on about him talking about something else, or being confused, or senile, or drunk... which caused him to hear "MUSLIM-tracking" and translate that to "whatever it is that YOU think is less volatile".
The fact is that this is just another case of him showing that he is thinking in "ferner" generalizing metaphors - mostly about brown people.
You know... like those Mexican drug-dealers, criminals and rapists.

Comment Nope. (Score 4, Interesting) 574

He is explicitly asked should there be a Muslim-tracking database system to which he replies the whole nonsense about "There should be a lot of systems, beyond databases" and "signing up at different places" when asked about signing people up at mosques.

Nobody is putting words in his mouth.
He IS an idiot that does not think or listen to other people and talks in thought-terminating cliches but he clearly understood those questions and replied to them in his poorly thought through manner.

Comment Nope. You're misreading the article. (Score 1) 399


According to a recent study of 27 schools, about one-quarter of female undergraduates and students who identified as queer or transgender said they had experienced nonconsensual sex or touching since entering college, but most of the students said they did not report it to school officials or support services.


According to a recent study of 27 schools, about one-quarter of female undergraduates said they had experienced nonconsensual sex or touching since entering college, but most of the students said they did not report it to school officials or support services.

Don't know where you got that highly specific flavor of transsexual, but it is not in the article, summary OR the study.
Study specifically bundles all transsexuals into a single category in order to have anything that looks like a percentage.

Using responses to this question, students were classified into one of four groups: (1) female, (2) male, (3) transgender, genderqueer or nonconforming, questioning or not listed (TGQN), and (4) decline to state.
Groups were collapsed into TGQN to maintain adequate sample size for generating estimates.

And when those, "when we sum up everything and anything and just call all of it rape" percentages, get converted to real cases they come out to about 20705.93 female, 3484.93 male and 388.64 TGQN cases of unwanted sexual... something.
So... Even with their VERY weird and inflated numbers - trans-numbers are SO LOW that the other category's errors are eating them up.
It is really NOT about "transexual / queer gendered females". Sorry.

But since "transsexual" is a better click-bait than nine times that many males reporting the exact same thing...
Fuck the males. Must be some kinda pansy faggots if they're being afraid of sex or if they are getting raped. Fuckin commie pinko pansies.
Fuck em. They don't deserve to be in the article. What do you mean "lower report rate"?
There should be NO report rate at all if they want to call themselves men.
Do you think John Wayne would report "unwanted sexual activity"? FUCK NO!
He was so manly his girly name became a boy name all on it's own! Scratch that! Not a boy name! A MAN NAME!

Wait... what was I talking about... ah yes... shitty study and survey.
Asking someone repeatedly (though they've said no) to go out, have dinner or drinks - is the same as asking them repeatedly for sex.

D5. Since you have been a student at [University], has a student, or someone employed by or otherwise associated with [University]continued to ask you to go out, get dinner, have drinks or have sex even though you said, "No"?
Never experienced

Which is all the same as telling crude jokes.
And here I thought my ex-boss was only fucking with our minds and our wallets.

Comment Re:Umm... no. You are misrepresenting the issue. (Score 1) 399

The numbers won't add up if there are individuals who were victim of more than one subcategory.

They have additional "both X and Y" categories. Numbers still don't match.
You simply can't get those sums from those numbers.

As for oral sex...
A gives oral to B, though A doesn't really like doing that, but still does it cause A thinks that will keep their relationship stronger or cause A expects some quid pro quo later, or is returning a favor for an earlier case of sexual pleasuring by B.
By said definition of penetration, A would answer "Yes" to unwanted penetration.

And should A be in a 69 with B on top - A would also say "Yes" to being penetrated while being "physically forced".

And thus consensual sex becomes rape.

Comment Umm... no. You are misrepresenting the issue. (Score 5, Informative) 399

From TFS:

Overall, 11.7 percent of students across the 27 universities reported experiencing nonconsensual penetration or sexual touching by force or incapacitation since enrolling at the IHE.

Which is about HALF of the fabled 25%.

The magic 25% (i.e. the long parroted and continuously debunked legend of 1 in 4 women being raped) was reached through following fiddling of numbers.
Again, from TFS:

To assess the overall risk of nonconsensual sexual contact, prevalence measures were estimated that combine the two behaviors that constitute sexual contact (penetration and sexual touching) and the four tactics discussed above (physical or threat of physical force; incapacitation; coercion; AAC [Absence of Affirmative Consent]).

Absence of Affirmative Consent being a catch-all category for any kind of "explicit" and "active, ongoing voluntary agreement" of "both partners".

The question that makes 11.7% into "1 in 4 women" being:

Since you have been a student at [University], has someone had contact with you involving penetration or oral sex without your active, ongoing voluntary agreement? Examples include someone:
- initiating sexual activity despite your refusal
- ignoring your cues to stop or slow down
- went ahead without checking in or while you were still deciding
- otherwise failed to obtain your consent

When that question, which no longer talks about rape but about failure to read minds and thus tell if someone is still deciding and a failure to "otherwise obtain consent" (possibly in written form) we get the magical 1 in 4 numbers.
Which would dictate that every family that has at least one female child, also has at least one rape victim (two grandmas + mom + daughter = 1 of them must be have been raped).

But even then more fiddling with numbers is needed to reach the magic 1 in 4 value. Such as limiting the survey response to seniors only.

According to the AAU survey, 16.5 percent of seniors experienced sexual contact involving penetration or sexual touching as a result of physical force or incapacitation. Senior females (26.1%) and those identifying as TGQN (29.5%) are, by far, the most likely to experience this type of victimization.

And if it needs to be more obvious that they get those numbers by padding the set and expanding the time frame...

Students who are relatively new to school may experience higher risk because they are not as familiar with situations that may lead to an incident of sexual assault or misconduct.
Examination of the rates for the current academic year show this pattern holds for undergraduate females.
Among freshmen, 16.9 percent of females reported sexual contact by physical force or incapacitation.
This percentage steadily declines by year in school to a low of 11.1 percent for seniors.

And then there are other issues...
Like defining "penetration" as "when someone's mouth or tongue makes contact with someone else's genitals", without defining whose mouth and whose genitals are in question.
The way question is defined, both giving and receiving oral sex constitutes penetration.
On whom? Well... On both giver and receiver of oral sex, according to such a loose definition.

Or "physical force" being defined as "holding you down with his or her body weight, pinning your arms, hitting or kicking you, or using or threatening to use a weapon against you".
Which equates physical violence and a gun to your head with "being on the bottom".

Or how numbers reported don't really match up.
Like penetration numbers for female undergraduates since entering college coming out to 10.8% with a standard error of 0.2.
Which was reached by adding up penetration with physical force (5.7%, std.err. 0.1) and incapacitation only penetration (5.4%, std.err. 0.1), while physical force penetration numbers come from adding up numbers for completed and attempted cases - which are listed as 3.2% and 3.7%, std.err. 0.1.
That's some strange rounding up. Or down.
Even with Excel errors from dropping decimal spaces 3.2 and 3.7 should not be able to give you anything starting with number 5.

I.e. Adding up attempted (10561 cases) and completed (9136) physical force penetration numbers we get 15966 cases. A difference in 3731 cases after adding up two numbers.
Adding the result calculated so far to penetration by incapacitation (15344 cases), penetration numbers come out to 30505 cases. A difference of another 805 cases.
Adding further 49945 cases of sexual touching to those 30505 cases of penetration it all rounds out to 65152 cases.
Another difference of 15298 cases.

Or to put it differently, the final sums are about 30.44% LOWER THAN WHAT THEY SHOULD BE.

Other tables have similar issues, but these are the most obvious.

My guess is they realized post facto that their badly written survey results in 1 in 3 women being a victim of rape.
Which were way too unrealistic, so they fiddled the numbers to get the "accepted" (dogmatic) "1 in 4" and "1 in 5" values.
That, or the researchers involved don't know how to use a calculator. Or how to add and subtract numbers.

Comment You know how you can use a clock... (Score 1) 965

That doesn't mean that the majority of the refugees are terrorists, nor even a sizable minority, but the argument does seem to have some merit. tell that someone is a prejudiced racist cunt?

If they tell you a thing like "You are an idiot if you don't imagine some terrorists are coming in with the hundreds of thousands" as if it is a rock solid argument - BEFORE any identification has taken place.
I.e. Prejudice [prej-uh-dis]
1. an unfavorable opinion or feeling formed beforehand or without knowledge, thought, or reason.
2. any preconceived opinion or feeling, either favorable or unfavorable.
3. unreasonable feelings, opinions, or attitudes, especially of a hostile nature, regarding an ethnic, racial, social, or religious group.

Oh and BTW, no. One of the attackers, at this time, has NOT yet been identified as a Syrian refugee.

Ahmad al Mohammad, 25

A Syrian passport in that name was found near the body of one of the men who detonated a suicide vest at the stadium.
Fingerprints from the body matched those of a man who entered Greece via the island of Leros as an asylum seeker in early October.
He is said to have travelled through Turkey, Serbia and Croatia on his way to Paris.

FranÃois Molins, Paris public prosecutor, said the authenticity of the passport "had yet to be verified".
Unconfirmed reports from AFP suggest that the passport may have belonged to a Syrian soldier of President Bashar al-Assad regime who was killed several months ago.

At the same time, the same passport is found at another location hundreds of kilometers away from Paris.
With another guy's face in it. On another guy.

So... Why not another guy's hand at the scene too?
I mean... if we're gonna make wild unconfirmed guesses about smuggling guns (which are much easier to just buy locally), finding a refugee with a passport, already in France, and cutting off his hand there in France...
Seems a lot easier than marching across a dozen borders just to be the only non-local to blow himself up in Paris.
As far as wild unconfirmed guesses go... it seems a lot simpler.

But not in the mind of our resident prejudiced racist cunt, SuperKendall. Or his pal, gay358.
Nah... see... they imagine brown people smuggling guns and bombs across borders - cause that is what they LIKE to imagine.
That is the way they are set in their minds, and that is the way they see the world.
As racist, chauvinist, prejudiced cunts they are.

Comment Re:Not all, but yes (Score 1) 965

ISIS has said they have several hundred operatives coming in with refugees. What reason have we to doubt that, especially now?

Yeah... what reason do we have to doubt people who kill people solely for propaganda?
Sure they wouldn't stoop down to !GASP!... lying?
Whoever heard of lying for propaganda, right?

And your vision of how those people are making it across ALL THOSE borders is ignorant and retarded.
Nobody is bypassing anything.
They are being herded like cattle, collected, counted, tagged, detained locally if needed (i.e. if they as for asylum right there), tear-gassed and batoned... but also given shelter, food, medical supplies, admitted into camps and even pushed around in wheelchairs if they can't walk.

As for guns... Why would anyone haul any over two continents - when they can just go to Belgium and buy whatever they want?
Just like what happened the last time there was a terrorist attack in France. And that time before that.

But nice to see you declaring yourself as a racist and chauvinist cunt.
Particularly considering that you have no clue about any of the perpetrators of the terrorist act above (as there aren't any yet and you are no psychic) AND the fact that so far, every time, terrorists were either locals OR perfectly legal immigrants.
Also, considering that terrorist attacks were taking place LONG before the refugees started poring in.

So you basically just imagined yourself "hordes" of brown infidels coming for your... whatever...
Must be great for you to be a cunt like that. Don't even have to buy yourself dinner or anything. You can just go fuck yourself any time you want!

Comment Re:I am a Christian and I do read the Bible ! (Score 1) 965

34 Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword. 35 For I have come to turn a man against his father, a daughter against her mother, a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law - 36 a man's enemies will be the members of his own household.

37 Anyone who loves their father or mother more than me is not worthy of me; anyone who loves their son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. 38 Whoever does not take up their cross and follow me is not worthy of me. 39 Whoever finds their life will lose it, and whoever loses their life for my sake will find it. Matthew 10:34

36 He said to them, But now if you have a purse, take it, and also a bag; and if you don't have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one. Luke 22:36

24 Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another. 25 They exchanged the truth about God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator - who is forever praised. Amen.
26 Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. 27 In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error.
28 Furthermore, just as they did not think it worthwhile to retain the knowledge of God, so God gave them over to a depraved mind, so that they do what ought not to be done. 29 They have become filled with every kind of wickedness, evil, greed and depravity. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit and malice. They are gossips, 30 slanderers, God-haters, insolent, arrogant and boastful; they invent ways of doing evil; they disobey their parents; 31 they have no understanding, no fidelity, no love, no mercy. 32 Although they know God's righteous decree that those who do such things deserve death, they not only continue to do these very things but also approve of those who practice them. Romans 1:24-32

8 But the cowardly, the unbelieving, the vile, the murderers, the sexually immoral, those who practice magic arts, the idolaters and all liarsâ"they will be consigned to the fiery lake of burning sulfur. This is the second death.

Basically... it's the very god those terrorists are bowing down to.
One that solves problems by killing, particularly regarding gays and "infidels".

Religion of love. Sure, sure...

Comment They are looking for engines too... (Score 2) 99

Two different types of radio signals were sought:

(1) Narrow-band signals, of order 1 Hz in width, such as would be generated as a "hailing signal" for societies wishing to announce their presence.
This is the type of signal most frequently looked for by radio SETI experiments.
(2) Broad-band signals that might be due to beamed propulsion within this star system.

If astroengineering projects are really underway in the vicinity of KIC 8462852, one might reasonably expect the presence of spacecraft to service this activity.
If these craft are propelled by intense microwave beams, some of that energy might manifest itself as broad-band radio leakage.

They are looking for possible "engine noise" too.
So far... well... nothing.

Comment 19.83 was the mean. 32 is (kinda) reliable cut-off (Score 1) 345

Raw AQ distribution

From the data (n = 450,394), the reported mean AQ score was 19.83 (SD = 8.71), and tests of normality (Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Anderson-Darling) revealed this data had a positive skew of 0.47 and a kurtosis of -0.27.

Further... STEM or no-STEM means about... the diddly part of the diddly squat.

When sex, age, and occupation are entered into a multiple linear regression model, less than 4% of the variance in AQ in the current sample is explained, indicating that other unmeasured variables contribute to autistic traits as measured by the AQ.

I.e. IF we are to take this study at face value - there is no significant difference between sex, age or occupation.

On the other hand...
It was an anonymous online-survey.
Of people who have just seen a documentary on autism.
Who were then invited to take the BIGGEST TEST EVER.

In the episode, the TV presenters (both medical doctors) introduced the topic of autism by giving population prevalence estimates, and explained that many individuals in the general population have autistic traits.
They invited viewers by saying, "Why not go onto our website and take the My MindChecker test to measure the extent of any autistic traits you might have, and whilst your results are confidential, the overall data will form the biggest national survey of its kind."
The program continued by explaining the symptoms of autism: difficulty with social interaction, trouble understanding aspects of humour such as sarcasm, feelings of anxiety associated with sensory stimulation, and intense special interests and hobbies.
The presenters concluded, "If you are experiencing similar symptoms [...] and want to find out if you have a condition that affects how you interact with the world and other people, then take part now in our self test."
The link to the data collection site was displayed at the outset of the autism segment and at intervals throughout the episode.
The presenters announced approximately 30 minutes after the initial mention of the website that 40,000 individuals had already completed the survey.

BTW, do you suffer headaches? Are you frequently tired? Do you forget things?
You might be having A DISEASE - take our test to find out.
COME ON! Everyone else is doing it!

Oh... and then there's the test.
Which, at it's higher specificity and reliability level, WHEN ADMINISTERED on people already referred to an autism clinic (i.e. someone with a degree in mental health sent them to be checked for autism) - guessed right in 3 out of 4 cases.
And it doesn't work for lower IQ individuals. Online test had no such limitation. All you had to do is click links.

A "drinking bird" would probably score slightly above average.

at a cut-off score of 26, 83% of people referred to an adult autism clinic were correctly identified (sensitivity 0.95, specificity 0.52, positive predictive value 0.84, negative predictive value 0.78), while a cut-off score of 32 was found to correctly identify 76% of people (sensitivity 0.77, specificity 0.74) [3].
The AQ was designed for adults with average IQ or above [1], so is suitable for use in the general population and for at least 50% of people on the autism spectrum [24].
The questionnaire is not suitable for individuals with low IQ or language impairment, as it relies on the comprehension of the 50 questions.

Use the Force, Luke.