Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Re:That's the best strategy? (Score 3, Informative) 113

by dburkett (#33913564) Attached to: <em>StarCraft</em> AI Competition Results
I'm a member of the team that built the winning bot (the one that wrote most of the mutalisk code, actually). One of the things we found out is that, as an AI, it's completely possible to keep the mutas' dps up without clumping them -- humans mainly have to clump them because they can't issue individual orders every second. When the bot is up against corsairs or valkyries (or any other unit that does splash damage), the mutas deliberately spread out to avoid getting splashed. Corsairs are still a good counter, but our mutas can hold their own against corsairs much better than most players. To address your bigger question, the choice of mutas was deliberate. Building any sort of unit controller is just hard and time consuming, so time constraints forced us to specialize, but we think we did a pretty good job. See another team member's post called "Overmind agent overview" for more details.
Programming

StarCraft AI Competition Results 113

Posted by Soulskill
from the teaching-skynet-the-zerg-rush dept.
bgweber writes "The StarCraft AI Competition announced last year has come to a conclusion. The competition received 28 bot submissions from universities and teams all over the world. The winner of the competition was UC Berkeley's submission, which executed a novel mutalisk micromanagement strategy. During the conference, a man versus machine exhibition match was held between the top ranking bot and a former World Cyber Games competitor. While the expert player was capable of defeating the best bot, less experienced players were not as successful. Complete results, bot releases, and replays are available at the competition website."

To be awake is to be alive. -- Henry David Thoreau, in "Walden"

Working...