She was an intern for the Senate Judiciary committee....
She was an intern for the Senate Judiciary committee....
Totally doable. The last time this topic came up on SlashDot, I think the discussion included a pointer to an ap for rooted Androids (or at least some specific models) that could detect stingrays. So this could be easily crowdsourced... if enough people carried Stingray detectors, and automatically uploaded to a website the plotted them on a map, we could pretty much have a real-time map of stingrays in operation. The problem is more social than technical at this point.
The railroaders that stay with the hobby are usually into history in some fashion. The research is the fun part.
Anyway... a few random hints:
1) Get a copy of "Track planning for realistic operation" by Armstrong and read it cover to cover about 37 times.
2) Learn about DCC track wiring and train control.
3) Micromark.com is a good place for miniature tools (not necessarily at the best price, but good selection.)
4) Practice your skills on something *small* to start with. Like a bookshelf switching layout that you can complete all the way to fully ballasted track and full scenery. There is no teacher like experience.
All I found was supposed summary of the interview. Given that Fried's attitudes about open hardware are at best schizophrenic, I'm not sure I trust her summary of the conversation. Fried is on record saying that "tools don't matter" -- so to her it doesn't matter if open hardware designs are only editable using proprietary tools, or even if the design files aren't released at all except as a pdf of the schematics. She is very, very short-sighted in that regard, but hey, it's a profitable form of short-sightedness.
As for Makerbot -- until proven otherwise it is best to assume they are beyond redemption. After all, they are owned by an aggressive patent-hoarder in the 3D printing space.
Sorry Jimmy, I just got back from London a few days ago, back to Sili Valley where I have lived for almost 30 years. Living in London would make me hate life after about 6 months. Heck, after 3 days I was more convinced than ever that the American war for independence was a very smart move. I'll take Sili Valley over London any day.
I agree whole-heartedly that Linus' people-management was the largest factor. But he also got another thing right: There is an old O.S. maxim -- "He with the most drivers wins." GP post says he "diligently kept rolling up contributions", which is the general case, but old O.S. grey-beards know "it's the drivers, stupid". Linus rolled in drivers for everything from everywhere, and had trustworthy lieutenants vetting them.
Linux won because it had a critical mass of drivers that let it run on just about any generic, main-stream hardware. Linus' project and people management caused that to happen.
This is the most hilarious thing I've read on the internet all week. And it is totally doable -- just mount a weed whacker on a Boston Dynamics Spot and you have a pretty good prototype for AngryGoat 1.0. The great thing about the weed whacker is that it is effective for both cutting grass and driving off burglars.
Not pointless -- convert everything to BTU's. The electricity has to come from somewhere. And there are distribution system losses, which for electricity are considerable. Show me BTU's end-to-end.
If you are up for it, search for information related to the Google self-driving car project. The data I saw was part of a presentation by one of their engineers at an IEEE RAS (Robotics and Automation Society) meeting that showed that in most cities, self-driving taxis would be a big efficiency win over buses, entirely because of low off-peak load factor.
I didn't make it up, but I don't have a link.
Show me the math for both ICE cars and Tesla, from well-head to road. Because generating electricity takes energy, and there are losses in the distribution system, and the charging systems are not 100% efficient either. Of course, getting oil out of the ground, refining it into gasoline, and moving the gasoline to refueling stations takes energy, too. Show me the end-to-end math, and then let's talk. A 4:1 advantage for the Tesla seems optimistic to me.
I have the same gripe with calling Teslas "zero emission vehicles". They are not. They are "displaced emission vehicles". Of course, it is easier to control pollution at a single point, and pollution controls scale up quite well, so the overall emissions are less for a Tesla versus an ICE vehicle. But don't claim the emissions are zero, they are just someplace else. (And I will grant that there are benefits to simply displacing emissions -- the Los Angeles valley, for instance, is a bowl, and so pollution tends to hang around in the air for a long time certain months of the year. Displacing the emissions outside the bowl has it's own benefits.)
Actually, buses are terrible. They only run fully occupied during peak times, and transit companies don't pull the big buses and replace them with minivans during off-peak hours. So most bus miles are run with very light loads. On average, buses are far worse than cars for energy efficiency because of the low average load factor.
Thanks for making my case about having the expert first before bringing in the tool. I've done a little bit of carbon fiber, but did not know about epoxy allergy.
Up above in another comment, I read someone saying you need to ventilate laser cutters do work with ABS -- no, you need to *ban* ABS because it destroys the tool. Plastics containing chlorine release chlorine gas when cut, and it doesn't take much ventilation to make it safe for humans. But, the chlorine gas combines with moisture in the air to create HCl, which condenses on all the expensive optic components and strips the coatings off. Soon, laser cutter is junk. Not many people realize that.
A good maker space will make sure there is an expert on each tool that understands how to use it safely and how to maintain the tool in good condition. At one maker space where I am a member, you don't get to use the tool until you have taken a class on the tool that basically teaches you how not to hurt yourself, and how not to hurt the tool.
I've been involved in a couple of maker spaces. One with a lot of machine tools and heavier machines. I've also toured a couple of hot metal oriented shops. My observation is that you really need to let the community guide the build-out and growth. Several reasons: 1. It's hard to predict what people will want until people start using it. 2. You need to have teachers for every tool. 3. Insurance issues will constrain some of your dreams. 4. You want things that people will actually use, because space for tools is a finite resource. 5. Your community may have different tolerance for tool learning curve.
You will find once you start that people will say: "Let's bring in an X." You should ask: Have you used one? Are you expert enough to teach others to use it? If not, can you find someone who is expert enough to teach it? Then after you have a potential teacher, you need to understand from that person the particulars of that machine and whether or not it is a good fit for your community.
Changing topics, here are some things I have seen at different shops, not all in the same shop:
CNC mill, CNC plasma cutter, small injection molding machine (these are all high-learning-curve machines requiring specialist insructors).
manual knee mill, metal lathe, wood lathe.
Sheet metal brakes/punches/english wheel -- surprisingly easy tools to get working with that enable very interesting projects.
Vacuum forming -- simple and versatile.
Hot metal casting -- simple, but needs specialist instructor and special spaces.
Industrial sewing machines and surgers -- enables really cool projects with heavy materials that would kill a home sewing machine.
fiberglass/carbon fiber work set up.
powder coating, paint shop.
glass melting and glass blowing furnaces.
electronics shop for working with surface mount components.
wire welding, mig and tig welding.
I'm sure I'm forgetting some.
Finally: One of my favorite machines is the popcorn machine. I learn a huge amount just by hanging around in the lounge and asking people what they are working on and how they are solving their fabrication problems. You want to build in some space that facilitates interaction.
Olin teaches engineering in a totally different way from other engineering schools. Design projects start in the first semester of the freshman year, and by the time you have graduated you have been in at least 10 project teams. Also, design isn't framed as a technical problem with a technical solution. It is framed as a problem for people with a solution that must work for people. The technical part is just a couple of stages in the middle. They have design classes co-taught by engineering profs and anthropologists for that reason.
Women drop out of engineering because they don't see it as meaningful, and have less tolerance for the bullshit of the two year calculus/physics death march before anything remotely meaningful happens. The traditional engineering curriculum does a poor job of answering the questions: "Why am I here? What is the point?" If you don't bring in your own answer before you start, and one that is powerful enough to sustain you through the bullshit, you will not find an answer in your coursework.
Ummm.... well.... I read the specs a few weeks ago when I first heard about this, and if memory serves, the current range is under a meter. I think self-driving cars will be using Velodyne LIDARs for a while longer.
The best things in life go on sale sooner or later.