So you both assert that I am less than forthright in a quest for a proper impeachment, which, who knows, could exhonerate Obama?
We both know that you would not accept that. You want him out at any cost, without concern for the law or what it could do to your own cause in the end if you removed him by force rather than using the law. You have been abundantly clear on that.
Hell the fact that you keep throwing around impeachment with the adjective "proper" attached to it only supports the notion that you have no respect for the law. You would discard any impeachment that did not immediately throw him out on the streets (preferably in Kenya, I presume?) as not being "proper". Obviously, in your view where the constitution only matters to some people in some cases, Obama is evil enough that the 5th amendment does not apply to him, right? Hell you are so obsessed in your movement to throw him out I doubt you'd even stop your witch hunt after January 2017 when his term is over, you'd probably have him dragged back to DC by his feet to stand trial some more.
What if it showed "not one smidgen" of cowardice,
Cowardice? How does one prove or disprove that? Cowardice is a feeling. You cannot prove what someone feels. This is likely just another excuse you are providing to keep the trial going ad infinum as you keep questioning whether or not he is honest with his response on his feelings.
What exactly is that supposed to mean? Inattention, as in watching too many data displays and not having enough conservative blogs from two days into the future on them?
or disregard for subordinates?
Well, the previous guy would just can his subordinate generals when he disagreed with them, and find people who agreed with him. I don't recall anyone calling that "disregard for subordinates".
More so, how are any of those impeachable offenses? They may be initiators of witch hunts, but they are not on their own impeachable offenses. Or at least, they never were before.
why aren't we getting the story out there
How many times do you need "the story out there"? It has been investigated and reported on more than once. Just because you don't like the results doesn't mean that there has to be more. You certainly haven't provided any reason to believe there to be.