Why don't you look at what I actually said: "She's a law unto herself." And
Your opinion on Hillary is at best a small part of why you so rapidly twist and turn on your "belief" in the rule of law. Your hatred of Democrats - and how enthusiastically you will shred the constitution to persecute them for being Democrats - is exceptionally well documented here.
Considering how far (R) has shifted to the right since the 80's the party would immediately declare the Ghost of Ronald Reagan to be a Dem.
That is logically sound, indeed Reagan is too liberal to be a republican. However one of the unshakable requirements for republicans is to praise him regardless; and they are not bothered by the hypocrisy (indeed they don't even acknowledge it). So while they should throw him out for being too liberal, they would be unable to bring themselves to do so.
She is gaining momentum in her campaign so we need to do something to slow her down
Slowing her down isn't necessary on slashdot. While we have a solid conservative majority in the slashdot user base, the overwhelming majority of slashdot conservatives will vote for whoever has the (R) after their name. In november if the ballot says Ghost of Ronald Reagan (D) vs Ficus Tree (R), the Tree will win the slashdot electorate by a landslide.
pretending and protesting Her Majesty's innocence
Yet slightly less than a full 24 hours earlier, at 4:30pm Thursday October 1st you claimed:
Saying that I've called for assassinations, disregard of due process
I figured you could at least make it 24 hours without contradicting yourself, but apparently you cannot.
I told him I had no idea what my direct office # is since I didn't call myself
Even worse, Hillary types emails the way people typed text messages years ago - clearly she's not qualified to be POTUS!
Phil Urich (841393) has made you their friend.
I'll admit this hasn't happened in a while, I was really expecting that this was going to be someone instead either foe'ing me or dropping me as a friend. Welcome to the mess, Phil.
So, stonewall on the facts
That word does not fit here. My statements are supported by your comments. I have not refused to answer questions on them.
don't admit begging the question
I was not begging the question. Just because you claim so does not make it so.
There has never been any lack of unsubstantiated accusation from you
If by "unsubstantiated", you actually me "substantiated directly by the comments written by smitty", then I would agree with you.
While eschewing the race card specifically,
Keep clinging to your conspiracy on that matter. Eventually one of your conspiracies will certainly come to have some merit behind it, right?
I've called for assassinations
We've gone over this one before, specifically in how you support it in your
disregard of due process
Which you have supported numerous times and arguably are still to this day supporting, every time you bring up another conspiracy about President Lawnchair and how you believe he must be immediately run out of town.
There is an important clarification needed here. You didn't call for plagiarism, you committed plagiarism. You eventually apologized for your offense, but not before desperately trying to see how many sympathetic ears you could round up to listen to you whine about "commie oppression" or some other such nonsense.
I'm not claiming that you personally have ever labeled me a racist.
cheap, baseless attacks
Your attempts to get me to call you racist are indeed cheap and baseless.
The message of our day seems to be directed more at the flesh than the mind. Why might that be?
You are free to imagine it that way if it makes you feel better about yourself and your own biases.
Two is not equal to three, even for large values of two.