September to November 2012 did occur
Indeed time did pass. However the mere fact that time passed was not sufficient to prove your allegations.
and we have the Administration's behavior to go on
Please elaborate on how "the Administration's behavior" supports your allegations.
So "nothing whatsoever" is both inaccurate and an example of the "penchant for denial" of which I speak.
The mere passage of time in no way supports your allegations of a deliberate lie. You have been swearing up and down that the administration intentionally lied about the situation. You have been swearing up and down that evidence exists to support that notion. The mere passage of time is not evidence to support that idea. To demonstrate that they lied you need to provide reason to believe that they knew better at the time they gave their initial assessment.
You have never done such a thing, in spite of the fact that I have asked you many times to do so.
never set out with the intention of overthrowing a presidential administration
Justice for the Benghazi Four is not the same thing as overthrow. Why do you H8 justice?
First, i do not "H8 justice". Second, overthrowing an administration based on a conspiracy theory is not justice. Third, it won't bring back the four who died. Fourth, you have been constantly pushing at least one conspiracy theory in the hopes of bringing about an overthrow of the Obama administration since at least January 2009.
You are shouting endlessly for the removal of the POTUS based on a conspiracy theory.
Actually, I say many other things, e.g. "Redistribute power, not wealth".
That is an interesting dodge, there.
How about some factual data?
As opposed to your non-factual data?
Again, you went and avoided the question; likely because you have no data. You are the one trying for the heftiest allegations you can come up with. Do you know how criminal justice works in this country? A defendant is not required to prove their innocence when on trial, they need only to convince a jury that the prosecution did not prove their own case beyond a reasonable doubt. You are for some reason pretending that the defense and prosecution are required to meet the same level of obligation in trial.
We just have to investigate Benghazi to find out what's in it
And if you don't find evidence to support your conspiracy theory, you'll still try to overthrow Obama. And what would you be able to find to support your allegations by investigating Benghazi itself? You need to investigate the administration's intelligence on the event, not the event itself.
You're really sounding unhinged
I suspect the condescending meme you intended to apply there was "stop hyperventilating" :)