Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Why bother? (Score 1) 420

by curmudgeon99 (#48663811) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: Is an Open Source<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.NET Up To the Job?
Fair enough. With MEB 2014, I sent genuitec a few nastygrams over their decision to punt on SVN support. I'm there with you. But I did get it to work well and you can always use Tortoise--that's what my team uses. Do you do a commit every 15 minutes?

As for your troubles with WebSphere--well, that pig is something I have been able to jettison many times for all the alternatives so if you're still stuck with WebSphere you have your own set of problems.

Also, frankly, I think you are being sandbagged if people can claim that 25% of their time daily is waiting for MEB. I think, frankly, that has to be bullshit--they are exaggerating.

Also, if you have to leave MEB, then there is the fabulous free Spring Tool Suite which does lots of what MEB does. I understand that, technically, .NET can connect to any database vendor's driver. But you also know that when you're in a MS shop you end up--because of support and tools such a VS--end up being a 100% MS shop. It just happens. I doubt MSDN is going to give you oodles of pointers on how to configure .NET and solve esoteric problems on Postgres, MySQL or Oracle. It's not in their best interest to support the competition. So, bottom line, the decision to become an MS shop is a higher cost point and so fewer and fewer shops are choosing that. I look back on my decision in 1999 to become a Java fiend as the best decision I ever made and I stand by that assessment to this day. The last product I worked professionally on that came from Microsoft was VB6 and it constantly fucked up. Certainly, your mileage may vary but I have found my salary spiraling up and up without end because I know Java and the JEE ecosystem and its many open-sourced brethren so well.

Comment: Re:Why bother? (Score 1) 420

by curmudgeon99 (#48660851) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: Is an Open Source<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.NET Up To the Job?
Rick, I just upgrade my team to MyEclipse 2015 and we have not had any problems. What problems did you see?

As for database connections and the price of any given database, I consider that orthogonal to this discussion, as you can in the Java world choose to use any DB you like, including SQL Server.

My experience--albeit limited--in the .NET space is that Microsoft tools have an affinity for Microsoft-built comrades. If I'm not mistaken, I believe Sharepoint requires SQL Server.

Comment: Re: Why bother? (Score 1) 420

If you need help getting some counseling, I'm here for you.

Denial is a tough row to hoe but I'm sure, with therapy, you can make the transition to another language. There's always PHP or Python if the thought of finally breaking down and learning Java is too painful for you. Or perhaps Go or Hack might offer an easier transition for you...

Comment: Re:Why bother? (Score 1) 420

I understand all about Mono but the monkey is still, after three major versions, missing huge chunks of what .NET purports to do, such as complete support for WF 2.0 and any real support for WPF. I understand what a pain it must be to work against the beast from Redmond with the monkey but you know as well as the rest of us that in Mono you are working on another Symbian.

Comment: Re: Why bother? (Score 2) 420

You know there are support groups out there that can help you with your grief about the immanent collapse of the .NET ecosystem.

Even Microsoft has orphaned you by going with HTML5 and JavaScript for Metro interfaces.

Java is the one. Going on about how nice Visual Studio is to work in is like telling us how nice the deck chairs were on the Titanic. It's too late, friend. Sure, .NET will live on in pockets of diehard iconclasts until finally even they--like Japanese soliders on deserted islands, thinking that WWII was still being fought--wake up to the fact that .NET is a dead man walking. Mono is dead. .NET is the Zune and Java is the iPod.

Can't you see the writing on the wall? Starting to open source .NET? That's a desperate Hail Mary ploy by MS to try to resurrect that corpse called .NET. It's dying and you need to get over your denial, and your anger and get on with the bargaining, depression and acceptance.

Remember that CEO who said CEO Friday: Why we don’t hire .NET programmers. Don't worry, you don't have to click on that link, I'll quote the relevant part for you:

...Everything, that is, but .NET.

Now let me clarify — .NET is a dandy language. It’s modern, it’s fancy, it’s got all the bells and whistles. And if you’re doing Windows Mobile 7 apps (which the stats suggest you aren’t), it’s your only choice. But choosing .NET is a choice, and whenever anybody does it, I can’t help but ask “why?”
Don’t get me wrong: .NET on your resume isn’t an instant showstopper. But it will definitely raise questions during the phone screen, for reasons that are best explained by simile:

Programming with .NET is like cooking in a McDonalds kitchen. It is full of amazing tools that automate absolutely everything. Just press the right button and follow the beeping lights, and you can churn out flawless 1.6 oz burgers faster than anybody else on the planet.

However, if you need to make a 1.7 oz burger, you simply can’t. There’s no button for it. The patties are pre-formed in the wrong size. They start out frozen so they can’t be smushed up and reformed, and the thawing machine is so tightly integrated with the cooking machine that there’s no way to intercept it between the two. A McDonalds kitchen makes exactly what’s on the McDonalds menu — and does so in an absolutely foolproof fashion. But it can’t go off the menu, and any attempt to bend the machine to your will just breaks it such that it needs to be sent back to the factory for repairs.

Instead, we look for a very different sort of person....

Comment: Re:Why bother? (Score 0, Redundant) 420

Because the .NET stack is inherantly more expensive. The tools cost big bugs, it requires a Microsoft server and will only run on SQLServer. All of the Java tools we use are free--every last one--and we run it on CentOS Linux servers. Finally, all our staff is Java oriented.

Comment: Re:Why bother? (Score 5, Interesting) 420

by curmudgeon99 (#48644667) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: Is an Open Source<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.NET Up To the Job?
Not true.
Monster:
  • NYC: 134 jobs Java, 74 .NET
  • Chicago: 59 jobs Java , 45 jobs .NET
  • San Francisco, CA: 116 jobs Java, 16 jobs .NET
  • Seattle: 38 jobs Java, 35 jobs .NET
  • Redmond, WA: 39 jobs Java, 32 jobs .NET

Dice

  • NYC: 863 jobs Java, 330 jobs .NET
  • Chicago: 293 jobs Java, 197 jobs .NET
  • San Francisco: 512 jobs Java, 115 jobs .NET
  • Seattle: 301 jobs Java, 74 jobs .NET
  • Redmond, WA: 13 jobs Java, 34 jobs .NET

So, ONLY on Dice and ONLY in Redmond, WA--Microsoft's home--are there more .NET jobs than Java. Everywhere else Java kills .NET.

Comment: Re:The "City of London" - A Lawless Square Mile (Score 1) 302

The City of London is indeed the heart of tax evasion. It directs tax evasion around the world.
You are absolutely a liar. I direct you to this Guardian story that explicitly states that as a fact.
You ridiculous comments about the Freemasons, etc is subterfuge trying to hide with disinformation the precise fact that the City of London is a world center of lawless scumbaggery and its apologists like you are the worst sort on the planet.

To us, it's an obscure shift of tax law. To the City, it's the heist of the century In David Cameron we have a leader whose job is to quietly legitimise a semi-criminal, money-laundering economy
Quote: But I've just read Nicholas Shaxson's Treasure Islands – perhaps the most important book published in the UK so far this year – and now I'm not so sure. Shaxson shows how the world's tax havens have not, as the OECD claims, been eliminated, but legitimised; how the City of London is itself a giant tax haven, which passes much of its business through its subsidiary havens in British dependencies, overseas territories and former colonies; how its operations mesh with and are often indistinguishable from the laundering of the proceeds of crime; and how the Corporation of the City of London in effect dictates to the government, while remaining exempt from democratic control.

Further evidence: The tax haven in the heart of Britain

"What they sell is escape: from the laws, rules and taxes of jurisdictions elsewhere, usually with secrecy as their prime offering. The notion of elsewhere (hence the term "offshore") is central. The Cayman Islands' tax and secrecy laws are not designed for the benefit of the 50,000-odd Caymanians, but help wealthy people and corporations, mostly in the US and Europe, get around the rules of their own democratic societies. The outcome is one set of rules for a rich elite and another for the rest of us."

Comment: The "City of London" - A Lawless Square Mile (Score 4, Insightful) 302

That is certainly rich. The "City of London" is a lawless square mile in the center of London that is not subject to the laws of England. It is the center of all the tax evasion secrecy jurisdictions around the world. If you think of the rampant and lawless tax evasion that goes on in places such as the Cayman Islands, Bermuda, the British Virgin Islands, the Channel Islands of Guernsey, Isle of Man and Jersey, they are all directed from this cesspool of lawless behavior known as the City of London.
For context I direct you to the magnificent book by Nicholas Shaxton called Treasure Islands: Uncovering the Damage of Offshore Banking and Tax Havens . But don't stop there. Further evidence of the vile and lawless damage the City of London does to the world:

"Love is a snowmobile racing across the tundra and then suddenly it flips over, pinning you underneath. At night, the ice weasels come." --Matt Groening

Working...