Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


Comment: Footprints in the Sand (Score 3, Funny) 290

by ctusch (#39645013) Attached to: Sony Projects Record Losses of $6.4 Billion

(Adapted from the widely overused 'Footprints in the Sand' poem.)

One night I dreamed I was sitting in front of my computer next to Sony.
Many scenes of past contact with Sony products flickered across the screen.
In most scenes I noticed some form of DRM helping me managing my digital rights,
but in some there appeared to be none at all.

This bothered me because I couldn't understand why Sony wouldn't care for some of its intellectual properties.
Especially music CDs seemed to be completely unprotected. So I said to Sony,

"You promised me, that if I bought your products, you would always help me protect my digital rights.
But I have noticed that especially IP in dire need of protection, like music CDs, has had no protection at all.
Why, when I needed you most, have you not been there for me?"

Sony replied, "The times when you didn't notice any kind of DRM, my child, is when I rootkited you."


+ - Outrage over 'Pedophile's Guide' on Amazon->

Submitted by pickens
pickens (49171) writes "A self-published guide giving advice to pedophiles that is for sale through online retailer Amazon is stirring up controversy on the internet, with some threatening to boycott the website. Amazon says it does not promote criminal acts, but also avoids censorship. "Amazon does not support or promote hatred or criminal acts, however, we do support the right of every individual to make their own purchasing decisions." Before authors are able to sell a work on the site, they are asked to read a set of guidelines, which bans offensive materials but Amazon does not specifically state on its website what material it deems offensive, instead saying "probably what you would expect"."
Link to Original Source

Comment: Re:What is up with this site lately? (Score 1) 161

by ctusch (#33121264) Attached to: Xfire Purchased, Team Leaving
FTFA: "Why is Slashdot almost irrelevant to the social media community? It used to be the biggest driver of traffic to tech web sites, but now it hardly delivers any traffic at all to them."

That's because:

a) half of the readers hardly even read the headline before commenting, much less click on the link
b) the other half doesn't want to click through a 10 pages article cluttered with annoying ads
The Courts

+ - RIAA:MediaSentry attacks based on "fictional&#

Submitted by yerktoader
yerktoader (413167) writes "Ars Technica is reporting the recent events in the Jammie Thomas-Rasset vs. RIAA Battle Royale:

"As P2P file-sharing defendant Jammie Thomas prepares for her retrial this month, her lawyer has sough to have the main evidence against her thrown out. In its response, the recording industry says that the complaint is based on an "entirely fictional set of facts and law.""

I hate to say it — and this is in large part because iANAL — the RIAA's argument in TFA make sense. Some educated and spirited debate here would be appreciated in helping to dissect said argument — I really don't want the RIAA to win this case, if only because Mrs. Thomas-Rasset is a great example of standing up to corrupt big business."

All the simple programs have been written.