Maybe then they'd come up sooner than 5 days later than everywhere else..
a little more strict? That's like saying hitler had a slight preference for blue eyes...
Kdawson has thankfully been gone for awhile now, unfortunately timothy picked up right where he left-off. I'm half convinced they are the same person.
Never seen them index generic tags. People can write all kinds of random shit in tags, unless they were linked to accounts, there is no reason for them to even be indexed.
yes, they can follow your profile to friends profiles and check any public photos they have, but again that requires someone have a facebook account in the first place. This was a discussion about people without facebook accounts, and if someone just typed a non-account name as a tag on a photo. Those don't show up in searches, so doing so does in no way lead back to you.
The OP was claiming that it was basically a requirement that you signed up for facebook so that you could manage photos tagged of you since people could tag you in photos even if you didn't have an account. I was pointing out that if you don't have an account making generic tags like that would in no way lead back to you. Those names aren't searchable and since you don't have a facebook account the HR person is extremely unlikely to know that that person is your friend and check their account on the whim that some random person might have pictures of you. If they did, they'd take a hundred years to hire someone by the time they had the whole department trolling through every single facebook account ever on the chance someone somewhere might have a picture of you.
Holy fucking reading comprehension batman.
Here is the original post:
It is entirely possible to tag someone's name into a photo that does not have a Facebook account
He was talking about people tagging people who don't have facebook accounts.
So the answer to your question is: You
But if you tag someone in a photo who doesn't have a profile, it won't matter. It doesn't link to anything.
It's a shame you're on a tech site but so ignorant of the technology that you're speaking out against. The way HR sees photos of your on facebook is because they find your profile and you have privacy set to public, and photos of you that friends tagged, which you approved are also sitting there publicly on your wall.
They don't find them via your friends profiles. They find them because of the connection to your profile.
So if you aren't on facebook, there is no profile for them to connect to, and they won't be showing up in any searches.
because instead of keeping track of time zones you'd have to keep track of whenever everyone got up. It's the same problem.
Instead we'd have multiple "clocks" showing us what the business time was in each "zone" so that we could schedule stuff accordingly.
i drove down I95 to NY from Canada many years ago, and did 100mph a significant part of the way. Interstate is great.
Recaptcha from google has been broken for awhile. I had it implemented on my site and got about a dozen spam sign-ups a day.
The moment I switched to a local "mycaptcha", which should have been easier to OCR, they stopped dead.
Population density is only part of it, raw population numbers are also a factor (volume). 25 million in the metro area, and that 17k is an average there are areas much higher than that in Seoul.
The crappy grammar would kill him before he even would got there.
No, the issue is the repeated and overused comparison of 90% of new tech gadgets to minority report by idiot journalists who couldn't write their way out of a paper bag.
Seriously have journalists never seen any other SF movie?
It's like the only movie that's ever had a futuristic interface in it at all.
The moment I see some mouthbreather mention minority report I stop caring about anything they've written.
The 80s called, they want their mood ring back..