"The same lybia you bombed to the grounds to "liberate from tyranny" had on average a better living standar than your beloved america (this sounds strange, I know, but have you ever been to libya?"

Citation needed. Yes really.

BTW I'd have left both Qaddafi and Saddam Hussein in power as they were basically secular and kept order, but if you make a statistical assertion do back it up.

"We expect people to be able to make moral decision"

Then be able to hold a (figurative) knife to their throat, for positive reinforcement. You may never need it, but trust alone is stupid and we all know it.

The Second Amendment exists for very good reason. One day, the laws and the lawgivers may not protect you. Any freedom worth having is worth taking lives to protect.

If the Founders hadn't been willing to send ball and shot and bayonet through the bodies of their Crown oppressors we'd still be a colony. Good causes are worth killing for after all other means are exhaused.

Also note that the embedding of the Right of The People to keep and bear arms is specifically intended to allow them the only means of countering tyranny when peaceful means fail.

How many countries understand it may one day be necessary to kill their own government and protect the potential of their citizens to do that?

Further, weapons exist in sufficient quantity in the US to make a popular revolt viable as the number of armed citizens utterly dwarfs the number of police and government and military functionaries, which groups would be divided in a serious revolt.

England has a few people with a few weapons, but they don't matter and the people there have long surrendered even more of their rights to their government.

Americans are indeed fat, uneducated slugs by and large, but if our masters one day overstep their bounds the Founders ensured we have a viable chance of killing them and taking the country back.

The tiny firearm crime rate among people who aren't garbage is a modest price to pay for that. There being no viable self-defense against a physically superior opponent without firearms, guns are also key to personal security in many areas.

There are many millionaires running businesses such as used car dealerships and vehicle salvage yards who started as mechanics.

There are many structural and pipeline welders who moved into owning their own contracting businesses or into inspection or who are making a very nice living in the nuke power station world.

There are many machinists who moved into owning their own successful machine shops.

Building a Sten would be EASIER than buying or building a 3D printer then fucking about with it to produce an inferior weapon.

The "mother of all machine tools" is the lathe, which can be used to produce the rest or the parts you need to get some of their tasks done on the lathe itself.

Here's a link to a complete set of Sten plans. There are many more. All the pantshitting over 3D printed weapons does is showcase the technical ignorance of the public and politicians who rule them.

http://www.milsurps.com/content.php?r=422-Blueprints-for-The-STEN-MKII-(complete-machine-plans)

No, the assembled "cartridge" is the explosive device, nor is there much barrier to making those.

By the time you exclude the nominal sizes of common bullets, not to mention case neck and body dimensions, your printer would be useless for doing "holes" in general.

", it is too expensive and is unnecessary for the average foot soldier, and too large and cumbersome to be used on anything other than a rifle that is stationary and supported, ie on a target range. "

At the moment. Let us not forget how large and unwieldy IR rifle scopes used to be....

Unlike the (beautiful troll as was intended) 3D printed weapon, here and elsewhere you can find plans for the real deal.

http://www.cncguns.com/downloads.html

Note that paper prints are more than sufficient to machine modern firearms. About 2000 bucks gets you a used manual milling machine. About the same gets you a lathe. You can use those to build a machine to cut a rifled bore if you wish. It's very old technology.

Remember the DeCESS T-shirt? Weapon prints can be protected speech too. They can also be incorporated into fiction as an illustration.

"I doubt that anyone would be able to 3D-print a bullet and its charge for many years to come."

Bullets are simple to machine and casts. Primer cups and anvils are simple to form and punch. The chemicals are basic chemistry. Good luck banning nitrates.

If you get paid, do whatever it takes to maintain the cash flow.

I don't care if my bosses drool constantly and shit themselves at random times during the workday so long as I get paid. If they want me to humor them, fine.

If they prefer to be affirmed in their stupidity and will punish dissent, fine, I have zero moral obligation to human obstacles.

I don't care if they crater their company, torch the buildings, then dance around them naked so long as I get paid. (I'd like to capture it on video then monetize it though.)

Businesses are expendable constructs to make money. Pay me and I don't give a shit what happens to their construct.

They make MILITARY news sites for this sort of thing.

Hey, much love on my part for modern weapons tech, but on Slashdot this is clutter.

Any techies who are interested know how to keep track of such events.

Anyone interested also knows any missile systems sold to Syria can be countered by standoff weapons launched from outside Syrian airspace in most cases. Extended range JDAMs and Spice kits mean expensive anti-aircraft missiles would have to be used against small, relatively inexpensive, "smart bombs".

Those can also be used to destroy Syrian aircraft in their shelters as well as SAM sites.

http://defense-update.com/20130505_israeli-standoff-attack-capability-against-terrorists.html

Not to me. I find my X200, to which I added 8GB RAM and an SSD, ideal.

It fits in a tool bag with my textbooks, making it ideal for school use.

1600s? BP and Royal Dutch Shell supporting a regime which didn't exist even before THEY existed?

Now THAT'S planning for the future!

Do tell how the Assad family is descended from the Ottoman Empire.

This will be interesting.

They need to bring the old SAC ways back. After TAC ate SAC and became ACC, things became famously slack.

Enforce discipline, fairly, but harshly. If people refuse to perform shitcan them. Air Force life is mostly cake, the bennies and retirement package are outstanding, and of course everyone there is a volunteer.

Perform or get the fuck out.