Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

[ Create a new account ]

corsec67 (627446)

corsec67
  (email not shown publicly)
http://phot.ogra.ph/
AOL IM: corsec67 (Add Buddy, Send Message)

Check out my Time-Lapse photography project: http://phot.ogra.ph/ [phot.ogra.ph] And videos from those cameras available here [vimeo.com]

Journal of corsec67 (627446)

Pure electric voting is as reliable as the space it occupies

[ #192456 ]
Tuesday January 08 2008, @12:54AM
User Journal

One thing I expected around the 2004 election was a virus/worm that randomly changed the values in Access databases. Don't change the schema, don't delete rows, just change the values that was in there. Not changing the schema and not deleting stuff would make it relatively unnoticeable for as long as possible.

If it used a 0-day exploit, and had a way to get through NATs (piggy back on a website request or something), then you couldn't trust any tallies or votes done on anything that touched the internet.

Imagine the havoc that would ensue if it was found out the next day that any elections that were voted on using electronic voting machines were void, and had to be done again? that would make 2000 seem like a small problem.

Too many people think "the computer said X, and computers can't lie" forget that computers get most of their information from humans, and if a human says they don't lie, they are lying.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login
Loading... please wait.