I get that. I was tweaked by the "as the human eye would see it" editorial statement. "Color corrected high resolution image" would have been enough.
Although, now that you mention it, I bet a oil painting done by an astronaut in synchronous orbit of Europa would be great.
Seriously: who or what interest does the state imagine it is "protecting" with this license?
(1) protecting under-age women from working in the clubs (2) tracking who's working in the clubs as a means of controlling or limiting prostitution, (3) stamping out human trafficking for sex trade. (4) They may be working as "independent contractors" in which case licensing allows tracking for taxation purposes