Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


Comment: Re:That's ok (Score 1) 211

by clydemaxwell (#35960670) Attached to: Feds To Remotely Uninstall Bot From Some PCs

Just gonna chime in here that getting some irritating unwanted messages in your inbox hardly warrants anything like what you're recommending.
I don't know what it is about penis enlargement advertisements that make people throw out common sense and respect for others out the window.

"Nuke the site from orbit, it's the only way to be sure"

Comment: Re:Record the Teacher (Score 1) 456

by clydemaxwell (#35913150) Attached to: Minnesota School Issues iPad 2 To Every Student

The quintessential billionaire college kid is a sort of idiot; he holds very few practical skills and has not even learned the technical end of his business very well (facebook being a horrible, horrible example of web design or architecture).
I'm gonna say that he's not a great example of why college is unnecessary.

Comment: Re:Good for US economy (Score 1) 617

by clydemaxwell (#35612180) Attached to: MS Wants Laws To Block Products Made By Software Pirates

It's the principle that if you're a US business or citizen, selling to US citizens or business, you can't get away with illegal behaviour by just shifting the illegal part of the process to another country.

and GM, for example, is not doing that. They are not picking parts suppliers with renegade copies of excel on their PCs specifically to avoid anything. It is simply not an issue and not their concern, and it shouldn't be. Only microsoft should be concerned with companies who pirate from microsoft. Mandating that the rest of us ensure that people aren't stealing from microsoft is wrong.

Comment: Re:Good for US economy (Score 1) 617

by clydemaxwell (#35612064) Attached to: MS Wants Laws To Block Products Made By Software Pirates

I love that you provide a theoretical scenario for what is a practical problem. If people were going to set up these 'pure proxy companies' to get around buying microsoft products, they would already be doing so. This is not a hypothetical.
It would not be a significant savings, and if software savings were the sole motivating factor clearly these companies would turn to open source. instead, it is clear that they are quite willing to pay for their properly licensed software products.

Finally, you missed the crux of the issue, which is that one company is being blamed for what another one has done, totally regardless of whether the buying company has any idea that the piracy is taking place. How should GM prevent this, demand software audits of all their parts manufacturer partners prior to purchase?

Microsoft cannot enforce its 'intellectual property' rights on countries that don't believe in them (or don't enforce them well). So they seek to punish US companies instead. And you say this is good for our economy!

Comment: Re:"Ownership of information" is quite clear. (Score 1) 102

by clydemaxwell (#35475188) Attached to: How Big Data Justifies Mining Your Social Data

i don't own my credit card number. i know it, and i have a reason to jealously prevent others from knowing it, but none of this constitutes 'ownership', which can't apply to information.
once it becomes known to you (legally or otherwise) i can't say you've stolen it. or that if you posted it on the web, that every viewer also stole it. since information is not a physical quantity, it cannot be possessed, only 'known'.

Comment: Re:The truth is (Score 1) 150

by clydemaxwell (#35437504) Attached to: In-Depth Look At HTML5

"I want to sell a better codec, but it's impossible because Google gives away mediocre ones."

this is outrageous. if there's no market, you don't have a viable business. that is no-one's fault. you seem to imply we shouldn't give things away because they'll hurt the market for expensive alternatives, which is so fundamentally bullshit it makes my brain hurt.

Comment: Re:And what would this accomplish? (Score 1) 339

by clydemaxwell (#35162632) Attached to: Is an Internet Kill Switch Feasible In the US?

Purposely breaking the Internet is pretty hard.

no, it's not. the government can tell every ISP to shut down. or to stop routing. hell, even to stop providing DNS service would kill the internet for most.

the internet can only route around black holes that aren't widespread, and only when it can still route. routing is an action that can be stopped, as proved in egypt.

To downgrade the human mind is bad theology. - C. K. Chesterton