Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


After Cell-Phone Switch-Off, Anonymous Promises BART Protest 258

Posted by timothy
from the foolproof-plan dept.
According to the San Francisco Appeal, the cellphone service shut-down that the BART system imposed Thursday (by disabling transponders which allow cellphone communications in the underground portion of the system), besides drawing rebukes from various civil liberties groups, has generated plans for a protest Monday organized by Anonymous.

+ - Safe Cracking Robot->

Submitted by mschaffer
mschaffer (97223) writes "Kyle Vogt and Grant Jordan built this safe cracking robot in 2006. It’s designed to open any safe that uses a Sergent and Greenleaf 8500 series lock. These locks are classified as “manipulation proof” by the manufacturer.
Well, I guess this the locks are still "manipulation proof" as they were only able to open the safe with the correct combination."

Link to Original Source

Comment: Re:torrent (Score 1) 198

by clone53421 (#34790856) Attached to: Atari Loses Copyright Suit Against RapidShare

No, they should calculate a checksum for the infringing file

They DO.

This would still not prevent people from uploading the file again if they really want to, but they would have to modify it in some way (for example package it into a new zip file) which is a lot more work than just uploading it unchanged.

Yes, that is correct, except the part about it being “a lot more work”.

Comment: Re:My kids are not vaccinated. (Score 1) 813

by clone53421 (#34780970) Attached to: Famous British Autism Study an 'Elaborate Fraud'

Thiomersal is added as a preservative ... i.e. make it safer for longer

That is not what a preservative does. Formaldehyde is a very effective preservative but that does not make it safe for human consumption.

Preservatives are chemical stabilizers and/or toxins intended to prevent biological activity. To preserve things intended to go in the human body, you have to use a preservative that is non-toxic to humans in that concentration, and that doesn’t build up gradually to toxic levels.

E.g. salt is toxic in high concentrations but is safely used as a preservative. Suppose a 28 gram portion of cooked sausage contains 183 mg sodium; that is a concentration of over 6,500 PPM. However it is perfectly safe when it dilutes in the human body, and since salt is extremely water-soluble it normally flushes out of the human body long before it could build up to a toxic level.

Comment: Re:People like cages (Score 1) 408

by clone53421 (#34780440) Attached to: Mac OS X 10.6.6 Introduces App Store

It would be good for you to kill yourself. Messily and painfully, please.

Your extreme jealousy and/or hatred of me is not warranted.

I mean, really. There is no cage. Your extreme jealousy and/or hatred of Apple is not warranted.

Nothing in my post inferred extreme jealousy and/or hatred of Apple. You’re imagining things.

Comment: Famous British autism study? (Score 0) 813

by clone53421 (#34778926) Attached to: Famous British Autism Study an 'Elaborate Fraud'

TFA specified that the study was:
    published by the British medical journal BMJ
    performed by Dr. Andrew Wakefield
    an 'Elaborate Fraud', and deliberately so

About the only thing it didn’t tell me was that it was the famous study linking autism with vaccines, which was sort of the most important point...

You can be replaced by this computer.