Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Fraud (Score 4, Interesting) 874

by chillax137 (#30301996) Attached to: Scientists Step Down After CRU Hack Fallout
Obviously you didn't take the time to read the realclimate.org post. They cite evidence in their refutations, show that most of the claims are taken out of context, and explain certain terms and phrases that can be considered jargon for their community.

In response to the readme file. Yes, the coding is bad. They aren't fudging the data though.

Comment: Re:Fraud (Score 3, Insightful) 874

by chillax137 (#30301052) Attached to: Scientists Step Down After CRU Hack Fallout
FALSE. All accusations of fraud have been addressed by the scientists in question, as well as outside sources. There is a reason this hasn't been getting much mainstream media coverage. For everyone's information: data was not manipulated, dissenting papers were not suppressed
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v462/n7273/full/462545a.html
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2009/12/cru-hack-more-context/

Statistics are no substitute for judgement. -- Henry Clay

Working...