Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Yes! (Score 2) 470

by centuren (#38652360) Attached to: Are Programmers Ruining the Design of eBooks?

The real issue *is* a programming one, most books are typeset by non-programmers and non-artists - Just like normal books, and normal newspapers so they need tools that will allow them to produce book that look as good as possible with no effort or time ...these are seemingly non-existent ...

Calibre *really* shows that it was created by programmers (yes, I know, duh). It's such a versatile program for editing (things like content flow and structure), converting between formats, and getting your new version on whatever device it's needed. It has an effective but obtuse UI itself, and shows little to no effort put into beautifying eBooks. I am always satisfied that my converted eBooks are easy to read on my android phone, but also always a little disappointed in their lack of aesthetic.

Comment: Re:No (Score 4, Insightful) 470

by centuren (#38652306) Attached to: Are Programmers Ruining the Design of eBooks?

The problem is that the design work is being done by someone who doesn't care about typography and usability, not because it is done by someone who is skilled in programming.

If you don't know about about structure, algorithms and logic, it is hard to give an application design that is novel, implementable and will actually work out the way it is envisioned. But to effectively design you need skills in design as well as actually caring about the usecases. Code is the medium to express design, just like paint and stone can be used to express visual art, but an interface designer who can't code is as useless as an artist who cannot use a paintbrush or chisel. Coding isn't that hard if you can structure your thoughts clearly enough to explain your design to others anyway, there's nothing arcane to it.

So the crux is, two things, equally important, the code and what you are coding.

I was getting ready to proclaim this the most off-topic Slashdot discussion ever, then I finally saw mention this mention of typography. Yes, there are more further down, but I'm already burnt out on all this UI and usability talk. The article is about eBooks, not readers or tablets and especially not desktop environments or word processors. When reading a book, UI and usability don't come into it -- those things are already fixed into the platform on which I'm reading the book.

Comment: Re:He's probably right. (Score 1) 352

by centuren (#38652166) Attached to: Michael Dell Dismisses Tablet Threat To the PC Market

Trying to do much REAL WORK(tm) on a tablet is an exercise in frustration. By the time you add a keyboard and mouse so that you can be even marginally productive you might as well get the tablet so that you can work even where/when there isn't a wireless network.

The tablet's niche is on the couch or the train or the bus.

I definitely agree that tablets are presently only handy at a few things. I can easily imagine a way that might change, though. Mr. Dell points to the college student as why tablets are no threat to PCs, but peripherals can change. It's hard to envision an exact form, but as computers get smaller and faster (laptops, tablets, and phones included), it makes a sort of sense to have one device at the centre of it all. A smartphone or tablet powering what amounts to a desktop computer once you dock it, or a laptop computer once you slide it in.

In any case, certainly tablets are no immediate threat to the pc market, just denting laptop and especially e-reader sales.

Comment: Re:Sucks to be you! (Score 1) 516

by centuren (#38007430) Attached to: How Do I Get Back a Passion For Programming?

The last thing I want to do after a long hard day's work of coding is to go home and do another N hours of coding. Not interesting. Now on the other hand, if your work having a slow period, I can see the interest in doing programming after office hours. Speaking of slow, I spent 8 months in my last job begging for work to do and they couldn't come up with anything, so when I went home at night, I worked on writing an open source library to exercise my brain instead of spending it on work work.

PS: In the end, I wasn't fired laid off; the company was just that dysfunctional.

Coding within an established body of legacy code in the office can be a mentally separate activity from branching out into a new area in which one doesn't yet have any experience. I might spend all day at work trying to figure out where another programmer's bug is using a 3rd party API, and find I can spend time a few days a week learning about developing for a platform I haven't worked in professionally. It's never a guarantee, though, I'm definitely inclined to agree with your main point. It's worth mentioning and then emphasizing, because if it works, it works.

Comment: Re:Sucks to be you! (Score 1) 516

by centuren (#38007388) Attached to: How Do I Get Back a Passion For Programming?

Second: Start a project on your own that is fun. (in my case: Make games!).

This can be a good suggestion. But before that happens, he needs the inspiration to actually go through with it. Wanting to do some programming, but not having a single idea of what to do is an awful feeling.

I find myself in much of the same situation as the submitter, and when feeling burned out inspiration is the single hardest thing to find. My suggestion, and also what I've been exploring myself, is finding other people in my local area that are interested in collaborating on a fun project. I'm in something of a college town, so younger, less-experienced programmers rife with enthusiasm (and eager to work with someone with 10 years on them) are about, making it really more about finding a project and time we can all get together.

Comment: Re:my cloak of invisibility... no make smart does. (Score 1) 309

by centuren (#37312564) Attached to: Tanks Test Infrared Camouflage Cloak

This isn't quite true any more. There are a number of system now in use that use sound and muzzle flash characteristics to pinpoint and identify the direction and gun the shot came from.

I believe those systems fall into the "wait for the bang" category mentioned, which, of course, is less than an ideal combat situation.

Comment: Re:Couldn't be worse (Score 1) 368

by centuren (#36606230) Attached to: Google Launches Google+ Social Network

It couldn't possibly be worse than Facebook. With Google's transparency with privacy, and already working business model (has facebook ever posted a profit?), I'd trust them over Facebook in a heartbeat.

Facebook screws me over daily. No, I don't want any facebook credits. No, I don't want to play farmville. Disgusting...

And yet you still use Facebook, daily?

Do I have a choice? Co-workers/Friends (use the term "friend" losely) get insulted if I don't "like" or comment on their inane ramblings at least 3-4 times a week.

Delete your account. Then promptly give your email address to anyone who complains and tell them to write some actual correspondence once in a while. If a photograph isn't worth attaching to an email and including a personalised message relevant to it, I don't see any merit to complaints that I'm not there to "Like" it.

I often liken Facebook to a bulliten board located at a hypothetical YMCA (or some sort members-only place, I've never actually seen a YMCA). It'd be ridiculous for me to write a Christmas letter to all my family and expect them to all become members, go to the Y, and read it. Or if you like, it'd be ridiculous for my sister to only post pictures of my niece there, and expect me to get a membership and visit to see it. Bulliten boards, and Facebook, are good for events or notifications, but I don't sympathise with any notion of Facebook replacing personal communication. I'm quite content catching up once in a while rather than a constant, less-personal drip of information.

Oh, and get off my lawn maybe? I'd like to think I have a justified distaste for the Facebook model, rather than being a grumpy old man in his 20s.

Comment: Re:So what (Score 1) 302

by centuren (#36485322) Attached to: Galaxy Tab 10.1 Judged 'No Match For iPad'

Actually, I take that back... go through the comments on the Fox site. The ridiculous amounts of negative feedback on the review more than makes up for the review itself. This should be posted in Idle though, like the joke that it is.

Honestly, I don't care about a fluff piece or negative feedback. If I decide I want a tablet in my life, all that I care about is demo distribution. I don't mean picking one up in a best buy that may or may not turn on. Can I actually demo one, which, as far as I can tell, means taking it home, using it, and seeing if it meets the expectation of being useful (and returning it at no cost to myself otherwise). That may sound like asking a lot, but I don't think it is for any company with faith in their product.

Comment: Re:What's the iPad experience? (Score 1) 302

by centuren (#36485288) Attached to: Galaxy Tab 10.1 Judged 'No Match For iPad'

Personally, I think far too many people have got lost in all the hype & marketing over tablets without stopping to think about the possibility that maybe they're just gimmicks anyway, whether iPad or Galaxy Tab.

Smartphones provide a lot in the way of communications, IM and playing music, their weaknesses are down to the screen sizes if you want to play a reasonably good game or watch some video.

A notebook or netbook has the bigger screen to do that, plus it has they have tactile keyboards so you can do serious work on them - something a tablet is not very good at.

So whilst a tablet would fit somewhere between a smartphone and netbook, it clearly is unable to replace either which means it just becomes a third device to carry around with you. And I thought the whole premise behind portability was being able to carry around less.

I'm sure people will have given specific reasons where a "tablet" fits in, but let's be honest: it's a gadget. If you have the money and desire, it takes little effort to find a way that it fits into your life. How many of us need $80-$90/mo cell phone plans? Speaking for myself, I didn't need a laptop, but the sofa and bed are more comfy than my desk (at least after sitting at my desk for long enough).

If you pull the "do we need this" argument, then there's not much to argue. I live with 7 irresponsible housemates (at my age, it's embarrassing but true), and no one wanted to take responsibility for PG&E, which is gas and electricity for those not residing on the US west coast. I warned power would go out eventually, and it did. Unfortunately no one learned a lesson in paying bills, but after a weekend without power, I learned that almost every power source we leave on (every light but the lamp next to anyone included), really isn't necessary. When power was restored, it almost felt wrong to turn any lights on.

She sells cshs by the cshore.

Working...