"Police go after people possessing part of a dead plant to combat the production of said plant. Police go after possession of child pornography to combat the production of child pornography. "
Except it doesn't stop production of said plant or porn. Police are just harassing the consumers. If you want to stop production get it at the source, otherwise it's just a power game. The fact is it's just a way to single out and control a group of people you can't directly stop(unless you want a general uprising to happen). Just take a group of people and target them with labels that they are porn users or druggies and the public ignores them and the police can harass them any way they want. Divide and conquer. Keep adding people to the list and asking for more money and before long everyone is divided and controlled. A slippery slope it is and an open door for the corrupt.
Remember just because you don't like it, whether you understand it or not, doesn't mean it's wrong. We all have our own views on how life should be lived. It's not your right to trample on some else's life if it's not harming you. That freedom of speech/religion/privacy/gun thing. Even government is limited, limits they are trying and succeeding to roll back everyday, and if what is being done by individuals is not hurting anyone else than so be it.
Let he who has the perfect existence cast the first stone. (none of us do have a perfect existence)
"Theoretically, by making the possession of child pornography more dangerous, they are reducing the value of it. Which in turn reduces the demand for production and thus the value inherent in producing it."
Theoretically, but in reality making child porn illegal does just what it did for drugs. It increases the value via scarcity and damages society by increased abuse of the public by power hungry people using/abusing often outdated or overreaching laws. Thereby criminalizing a good sized chunk of the public doing something that is non-violent, fun, and often harmless except to those with agendas. Demand never went down and actually has gone up as it's now forbidden fruit. The laws only drove the real child porn production underground, just like drugs. Child porn has only been illegal since 1976 and those laws were passed to prevent excessive child neglect via business profiteering due to the cost of creation not to go after individuals who view it/use it. When kids can create their porn and send it to their friends for nothing the law has been made completely irrelevant. And children do have rights of choice even if as adults we don't like to admit it. I haven't been seeing anything in the news in awhile about prosecutors going after kids, guess they realized pissing off their voter parents by severely abusing measures wasn't such a good idea. Never mind what those kids learned and with how they'll think and act when they grow up. I won't even comment on prosecutions of 18 year old boys/men screwing their 16 year old girlfriends.
Talk to your parents, the USA was doing just fine before these idiotic laws were passed. Besides we're all child molesters when were young. What do you think all that sexual shit we go through as children, teenagers, and twenty-somethings is about. Somehow I don't think decade old laws and hundred year old cultural views will ever override million year old hormonal and sexual drives.
Speaking of drugs I see cigarettes and alcohol is still legal given the expense of production as much of it's subsidized, and the huge body of evidence of addiction and abuse by producers and users. While a useful, free growing weed, marijuana(hemp) that is cheap to produce, available everywhere, and is not addictive, is illegal.
Somehow forbidding a private citizen from possessing anything, that's not actively hurting someone else, in a supposedly free country seems kind of wrong.
Since we're going after everyone else. Why are those private fusion/chemical/biological researchers still on the loose? Never mind these individuals experimenting with little containment if something goes wrong. Just considering if they screw up it probably won't be little(especially biological). Monsanto should be butchered just on the biological(seed lines limits/cross contamination of independents)/legal(harassing independent growers and supporters)/financial(driving up grain prices) problems they've caused. (Just pointing out legal stupidity in action)
The USA, land of the hypocrites.
"Notice when we don't like anything we declare war on it. It's our only method of discourse is to declare war. We don't do anything about it. The war on drugs. The war on poverty..." -- pseudo Carlin -- He has other more on topic but this is the one that came to mind at the moment.