Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Misleading to call it "non-copied" (Score 1) 657

by careykohl (#38825981) Attached to: Non-Copied Photo Is Ruled Copyright Infringement

So if someone takes a picture of something you are actually arguing that anyone else who ever takes a picture of that thing again is infringing some mythical copyright? That is preposterous!

Art is art!

And yes, if you charge more then someone can afford for your art, they should always be allowed to recreate it themselves, and as precisely or imprecisely as they wish.

If someone wishes to use a particular photo as a trademark, or logo of some kind that is an entirely different issue from copyright.

Science

+ - First-of-its-Kind X-ray Images Intact Viruses->

Submitted by Zothecula
Zothecula (1870348) writes "In a paper published in the current edition of Nature, an international team of scientists describe how they obtained the world’s first single-shot images of intact viruses – a technology that could ultimately lead to moving video of molecules, viruses and live microbes. Another paper by the same team describes how they were also able to successfully utilize a new shortcut for determining the 3D structures of proteins. Both advances were achieved using the world’s first hard X-ray free-electron laser – the Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS) – which scientists hope could revolutionize the study of life."
Link to Original Source

Comment: Re:This is called... (Score 1) 290

by careykohl (#35137038) Attached to: Takedown Letters For WP7 <em>Tetris</em> Clones
No it's not

Copyright does not protect the idea for a game, its name or title, or the method or methods for playing it. Nor does copyright protect any idea, system, method, device, or trademark material involved in developing, merchandising, or playing a game. Once a game has been made public, nothing in the copyright law prevents others from developing another game based on similar principles. Copyright protects only the particular manner of an author’s expression in literary, artistic, or musical form.

http://www.copyright.gov/fls/fl108.html

Comment: Re:Larger Scale Than One Agent (Score 3, Interesting) 235

by careykohl (#34627884) Attached to: DHS Seized Domains Based On Bad Evidence

Well, lets see, from the affidavit...

RapGodFathers.com and RMX4U.com both had forum sections labeled "Bootlegs" and "Appz" with admin written descriptions stating they were for the posting of links to illegally shared content. So they were encouraging copy right violations.

Torrent-Finder.com appears to be entirely clear of any wrong doing based on what is in the affidavit. Every piece of "evidence" came from some other website and Torrent-Finder presented it as news without any editorial comment being noted.

Dajaz1.com and Onsmash.com are both run by idiots apparently. They (and the artists that leaked to them) forgot that when the RIAA handed those huge ass checks to the rappers the RIAA got the copyrights. Doesn't matter that Kayne West told them they could leak his stuff... he doesn't own the distribution rights to it any more.

I doubt DHS and ICE are going to get their asses handed to them for busting 2 sites that skirted the rules so closely they fell over the edge, and 2 sites that found out the hard way that artists who sign with RIAA members don't own their distribution rights anymore.

The Torrent-Finder.com situation seems to be the only one that has no basis.

Comment: Re:I dunno, man... (Score 1) 306

by careykohl (#33599988) Attached to: Facebook Competitor Diaspora Revealed
But the words themselves don't have any actual meaning. Of course they've been carefully crafted as you pointed out to invoke "my space" and "a book of faces", but even then there is no actual meaning is there? There is enough wiggle room that the developer gets to define what it means.

Diaspora already has a well defined meaning. And to some people it means something quite ugly indeed.

I understand the developers wanted to invoke "the movement or migration of a group of people away from an established or ancestral homeland", but they seem to have ignored the fact that when something is referred to as a diaspora it wasn't all that fun, or social, or enjoyable as far as the people it affected were concerned.

They should have invented a word. A nice, short, easy to type, easy to say, and easy to remember word. Then they could give it what ever meaning they wanted to.

Comment: Re:I dunno, man... (Score 2, Insightful) 306

by careykohl (#33598858) Attached to: Facebook Competitor Diaspora Revealed
Not to mention the people who aren't going to use it because they don't know what the word means
Or the people who won't use it because they don't know how to pronounce it
Or the people who won't use it because they don't know how to spell it
Some of my hickiest relatives tell me to go check out their "myspace" page, or their "facebook" page. I can't ever imagine any of them telling me to go check out their "Die-Ass-Pour-A" page
Great concept, lousy name

Comment: Re:I'm conflicted (Score 3, Interesting) 980

by careykohl (#31834188) Attached to: Will Adobe Sue Apple Over Flash?
Well the argument now isn't about allowing Flash, it's about allowing C/C++/Objective C applications that Adobe Flash CS5 exported from an application that was originally built with Flash. Apple had a case when they wanted to keep Flash off and keep everything C/C++/Objective C based, but if Adobe has managed to build a compiler that turns Flash into Objective C then Apple has no business rejecting apps simply because they were developed on software from a company they don't like.

Comment: Re:And the big deal is what? (Score 1) 534

by careykohl (#30475660) Attached to: $26 of Software Defeats American Military

I find it hard to believe that we've come up with a completely silent turbo-prop and that they fly so high above the earth that they can't be seen.

Haven't seen anywhere in an article what they've been able to look at. All I can see is 'video' so not sure if that includes the infra-red stuff or not. Oops, sorry, don't wanna tip off the enemy. I mean the super-spooky, vodoo video.

The enemy knows exactly how those things work. You know how they found out? When the war started our side couldn't get enough video out to the news outlets to show how awesome we are.

Rule of thumb for insurgents: If you get buzzed by a drone they probably spotted you

Rule of thumb for US Military: If you buzz someone and they are holding a laptop and a satellite dish they spotted you

In all seriousness has it given them any advantage at all? Even with them seeing the images they haven't really countered them have they?

Comment: Re:And the big deal is what? (Score 1) 534

by careykohl (#30473722) Attached to: $26 of Software Defeats American Military

At first I thought you said a sandwich colored tarp . ???????????

Well that would probably work too.

You are a young military go getter assigned to sit around all day watching video of sand.

Suddenly a vision of a BLT races by.

Do you head to your superior? Or do you head to the cafeteria for a snack?

Comment: Re:And the big deal is what? (Score 1) 534

by careykohl (#30473178) Attached to: $26 of Software Defeats American Military

The drone is flying over your head. It circled around and came back. Guess what? What ever you were doing drew a US operator. See how easy it is? And I didn't even *need* to see the video.

Figuring out better cover is easy too. Put a sandish colored tarp over what you're doing. Did the drone that just flew over come back? Bingo! You're probably golden. Has it come back 47 times in the last two days? I'd say you need a new tarp.

Comment: And the big deal is what? (Score 1) 534

by careykohl (#30472784) Attached to: $26 of Software Defeats American Military

Honestly, what is the big deal?

FTA: '... the intercepts could give America's enemies battlefield advantages by removing the element of surprise from certain missions and making it easier for insurgents to determine which roads and buildings are under US surveillance.'"

An advantage? How? You know how the insurgents can figure out what roads and building are under US surveillance? It's the ones we keep flying drones over! I mean they can see the drones, they can hear the drones, they know what they're doing when the drones fly over them, they know the drones are taking video and pictures, and they should already have a pretty good idea what is in the video and pictures already.

Now if they somehow figured out how to tap into the cameras and have the drones relay video and pictures when they were flying back into base then I would say they've got an advantage, or if they tapped into actual satellite and spy plane footage.

Sure it's a bit stupid they didn't encrypt the actual feed but is the enemy getting any information they didn't know about already?

Never test for an error condition you don't know how to handle. -- Steinbach

Working...