If we could fit the entire system on a chip, Then you could speed up. But choice goes out. No choice at all.
Or have we (secretly) hated HW patenting all along, just as bad as SW patenting? Or is it just the current setup of the patent system that is the problem?
HW patenting isn't as bad. Let me illustrate: The PAL tv colour circuitry had essential patents, many owned by Telefunken. The Japanese competitors could not use these patents in their equipment, so they developed ways around the patents, and, ultimately, better televisions. Unless you're breaking new ground, you can only get a patent to cover direct copies of your device in hardware. One company slavishly copied the day/night car mirror design of another. I worked briefly for the copyists, and their legal advice was that they could copy the circuit exactly. They did. They could not copy the mechanical action, however, and had to avoid using an eccentric to do it. The problem with software patents is that applications of known techniques to new areas are patentable, whereas in fact they really are 'prior art.'
Have to agree. This is on the scale of "That old lemur we found could be _the_ missing link in human evolution." Which one of the 1000s of missing links?
Can't blame the guy (who obviously worked hard) for trying to make his work sound interesting. But it's significance is that it may be one of the lower steps in someone else's future ladder.
In space, no one can hear you fart.