Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


Comment: Re:Personal Anecdote (Score 1) 255

by business_kid (#49232511) Attached to: On Firing Open Source Community Members
I can imagine many projects where that could happen. I'm a linux user. IMHO, the kernel is becoming impossible for a user to compile; KDE sucks - it's too $£@&! big; Gnome sucks for the same reason; X sucks in the graphics area. and pppd . . . The fact is software writers with Aspergers make poor judges of character. Power corrupts. I'm a believer in firing people from OSS. But there should be a process where nobody uses dictatorial headship, but everyone with a right to express themselves voices their opinion and reproves one or the other in a conflict. Trial by peer, I suppose.

Comment: Re:Patenting (Score 1) 64

by business_kid (#49232435) Attached to: Open Source Hardware Approaching Critical Mass

Or have we (secretly) hated HW patenting all along, just as bad as SW patenting? Or is it just the current setup of the patent system that is the problem?

HW patenting isn't as bad. Let me illustrate: The PAL tv colour circuitry had essential patents, many owned by Telefunken. The Japanese competitors could not use these patents in their equipment, so they developed ways around the patents, and, ultimately, better televisions. Unless you're breaking new ground, you can only get a patent to cover direct copies of your device in hardware. One company slavishly copied the day/night car mirror design of another. I worked briefly for the copyists, and their legal advice was that they could copy the circuit exactly. They did. They could not copy the mechanical action, however, and had to avoid using an eccentric to do it. The problem with software patents is that applications of known techniques to new areas are patentable, whereas in fact they really are 'prior art.'

Comment: Re:Great stocking stuffers in certain circles (Score 2) 192

by business_kid (#49225869) Attached to: Will you buy the new $10,000 Apple Watch?
Too True. The way they divide down over here (Ireland) is "New Money!!" & "Old Money." New money types have the small willy syndrome and need to prove they are rich. Purchases are often statements "I have Arrived."
Old money, OTOH, are tight in the main; It's just that they don't blink if the price is â10 or â100,000. They still want to know if they are getting good value. Everything is viewed as a business investment.
What sort of an object is a Kardashian?

Comment: I also think you have your head up your butt (Score 1, Flamebait) 327

by business_kid (#49036759) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: Panic Button a Very Young Child Can Use
I have epilepsy. Sorry to be hard, but if you apply the "Worst case analysis" that engineers use, all your wearables / toddlers / gimmicks are trash. Is your toddler going to pull your patient wife off the cooker that's setting her on fire? Stop her bleeding? Decide when to ring for medical help?
Most epileptics know when they have issues coming. If your wife does, have an effective strategy to deal with that. If not, rethink your career. Can you take less money and work from home? Cut some deal with your boss? Take less money and work nearer home?
There is also a little known perscription drug called Epistatus. It never seems to get approval, but is available on perscription. It is absorbed through the cheek, and can be administered while unconscious. There's a youtube video.

I hear a lot of YOUR opinions, but nothing of your wife's opinions. What does she want you to do?

Comment: Not many (Score 1) 1

by business_kid (#48996537) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: Who do you trust your long term data?
Personally, I have an account with - Kim DotCom's outfit. Everything is encrypted all along the way. The small print reads: "If you lose your password, don't come looking to us for it - we haven't got it!" Most of the big ones & obvious options (apple cloud, onedrive, etc) can or have been hacked to some extent. Google is more interested in my data than I am, which makes me nervous.

Comment: Commenting here is a mug's game (Score 0) 341

by business_kid (#48710639) Attached to: Pope Francis To Issue Encyclical On Global Warming
These comments read like a script from Family Guy. For every statement of what is opinion or could be sense, there seem to be two or more putdowns, 2 insults, and a number of mindlessly stupid irrelevancies.
Yes, the Catholic Pope addressed Global Warming giving the Scientific Consensus. Yes, he is remarkably sane for a high ranking Catholic - electing him was an grave error, or else the cardinals felt quite desperate. Yes, he should be kicking out of the Vatican all criminal priests with diplomatic immunity, purging his organization of pedophiles, talking about God's Kingdom and using God's name, divesting the church of it's ill gotten gains and putting them to good use. But it is an obviously false religion. As it influences people less, it rides along with their opinions more.
The truth is - I don't think Catholicism is an organization that can be reformed. Now that I have said that much, watch for the insults, put downs, and mindless irrelevancies.

Comment: What companies will be Gone? (Score 1) 332

by business_kid (#48705101) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: What Tech Companies Won't Be Around In 10 Years?
It;s a good question if any of us will be here. To quote Arthur C. Clarke: "This is the first age that's ever paid much attention to the future, which is a little ironic since we may not have one."
Red Hat will still be there; systemd is crap, but people who need to learn it. There is a man page. They got away with worse (selinux, their network script, pppd, etc). They have a steady income stream in Enterprise.
Oracle may not be; Motorola, Ericsson and Blackberry will all fade and shrink, or be bought over.
M$ will be smaller, but still probably there if they manage to do one thing without making a total mess of it. That is a tall order for them. Xiaomi may kick Samsung's ass but they will both probably survive. I see a fallout in newspapers, magazines, and reading matter generally as prople go vitrual.

Comment: Re:Not a measure of quality (Score 1) 139

by business_kid (#48665957) Attached to: Does Journal Peer Review Miss Best and Brightest?
You're on to something here. This is actually one of several things that seem to be wrong in the system. The metrics seem to have been devised by personnel demons ('scuse me, They are HR now :).
1. Science is conservative. The 'higher' you get, the more conservative you have to be.
2. Scientists in many fields do not read enough papers. They don't have the time. They grab abstracts and conclusions and read a section or two. They also might read a paper to contradict it destructively. Look at the evolution/ID debate if you don't believe me.
3. Papers are too long anyhow. Length is equated with depth, but it might more properly be equated with obfuscation.
4. As you said, counting citations is a joke.
Much more relevant might be a system where papers consisted of
1. Background was relegated to an appendix. Maths in another. Statistics to a third (if required). The briefest of introductions
2. Next an experimental discussion which set out only information necessary for the understanding the experiments, and their results.
3. Next a section on implications of experimental results.
4. All tripe about work done to be reserved for the lecturers who are marking student papers.
Each chapter would be a generous summary of the drivel currently making reading papers such a boring job.

Comment: Re:News for nerds!?! (Score 1) 91

by business_kid (#48308285) Attached to: Photon Pair Coupled in Glass Fiber

Have to agree. This is on the scale of "That old lemur we found could be _the_ missing link in human evolution." Which one of the 1000s of missing links?

Can't blame the guy (who obviously worked hard) for trying to make his work sound interesting. But it's significance is that it may be one of the lower steps in someone else's future ladder.

Comment: Good & Bad News (Score 1) 427

The Good news is they are getting tough with OEMs. Let them start in China. Companies like Rockchip, a chinese SoC manufacturer, sell their boards into tablets, cubes and all sorts of gimmicks, but never update. I have such a tablet with Android-4.2.2. No update available, and there are shameful holes in security. It has proprietary modules which prevent using CM or other software. As for the bad news - 20 google apps - well, that's a shameful waste of memory, but I can always delete the shortcuts :-). Perhaps even the packages too.

Comment: Re:Circular "reasoning" (Score 1) 795

by business_kid (#47975397) Attached to: How Our Botched Understanding of "Science" Ruins Everything
I disagree with a lot of what's being said. I have faith in God. But I don't regard anyone involved in WW2 or any war as Christian. Christ is not a pacifist, but he was not involved in THESE wars, which are about keeping leaders in power more often than not. BTW, has anyone noted the original logical flaws? If science has 'high priests,' it's a religion, or some chancers are putting one over on people big time.

Comment: Re:A few hundred extrasolar planets (Score 1) 80

by business_kid (#47975313) Attached to: Astrophysicists Identify the Habitable Regions of the Entire Universe
Mark Twain made my point, so I'll just quote him: In the space of one hundred and seventy-six years the Mississippi has shortened itself two hundred and forty-two miles. Therefore ... in the Old Silurian Period the Mississippi River was upward of one million three hundred thousand miles long ... seven hundred and forty-two years from now the Mississippi will be only a mile and three-quarters long. . . . . There is something fascinating about science. One gets such wholesome returns of conjecture out of such a trifling investment of fact.

Comment: Beyond the Big Bang (Score 2, Interesting) 226

At the moment before the Big Bang, science doesn't claim to know what was happening. There was no observable universe, except possibly for a massive singularity, which gravity would lock together with unimaginable force. Do you feel the subsequent events were caused by something, or Someone? If so, what or who?

Committees have become so important nowadays that subcommittees have to be appointed to do the work.