Only if Rupert notices them.
Exactly, submitter is obviously biased.
"This removes intelligence capabilities that have existed throughout the Cold War, and which may have helped to prevent a 'hot' nuclear war. Have the actions of Snowden, and, apparently, the use of weak encryption, made the world less safe?"
Its a twisted mind that thinks to be safe a country need to invade the minds of other nations rather than earning their respect and admiration.
Trust is the most valuable attribute, spying destroys trust.
Dont blame the messenger.
(And now i feel dirty for mentioning it)
Well there was this http://www.fsf.org/news/endors...
But i was being facetious, so
As part of AMD's QA process they first submit their driver and sample hardware to the FSF and debian for rigorous testing.
Once approved it will be submitted to Linus for inclusion in the official kernel.
Only when all parties are satisfied the product is stable and efficient and all 3 major OSS's will QA sign off on release of the product.
Oh wait, no, that isnt the plan at all.
Come on, of course 100% detection rate is possible! We don't know about any threats it doesn't detect!
But they also say they protect against the "unknown unknowns".
Claiming "100% protection against the unknown" really should get this company investigated for fraud.
The law was bought in to give them permission to do something they always did anyway, you think a politician can stop them now ?
Until one of them goes to Jail nothing will change.
Just add their logo in the bottom corner of all the movies and call it art.
But of course the law is about playing favorites
OTOH If someone had read all the major religous texts from all the major religions, then they could be objective 'the bible'. (assume you mean just one of them)
Sometimes you get so close to something you lose sight of whats happening around it. Like the saying 'Cant see the forrest for the trees', or people arguing if the best editor is Vi or Emacs.
To be objective is really difficuly, you need to be able to see the details without losing sight of the big picture.
If the only book you read is the Bible, i would say you most certainly can NOT be objective about the bible.
I disagree with the premise, that fame is more important than domain-specific expertise.
I disagree than domain-specific expertise permits objectivity in that domain.
(i also agree with you)
Not if you're a spy agency.
Such an old fashioned term, they called advertising corporations now.
With those uniforms ?
This is only news if you think the NSA still couldn't easily gain access....
The question is how hard they have to work for it.