Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×

Comment: flicker probably not an issue (Score 2, Informative) 133

by boog3r (#27719869) Attached to: New Material For Fast-Change Sunglasses, Data Storage

(not sure why i posted this on their website. i blame the booze).

Did a bit of math and figured out that at 60mph you would need a complete obstruction every 2.5 feet to induce a state change (on-off), 5 feet for a full flicker (on-off-on).

This compound cycles on-off 33.333 (repeating, of course) times/sec. Halve that for a full on-off-on cycle. The human eye can do fine with a video frame rate of 30/sec, but can detect up to 72 frames/sec.

It is possible the flicker may induce optical illusions, but not likely considering the optimal cycle time produces the highest flicker rate. Any UV transition slower will produce less flickers/sec, while a faster transition will create an increasingly static tint (chemical can't transition quickly enough).

Now sitting under a 60Hz black light, that may be kind of trippy.

"I'm not afraid of dying, I just don't want to be there when it happens." -- Woody Allen

Working...