Well, reality does have a known liberal bias.
Is that what the guy on record for stating "If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor" said to you?
The fact that the system was engineered to rely on root name servers does not mean that that is the only way it could have been, or can be engineered.
In any event, naysayers like you have a very poor track record on predictions.
I apologize for the pedantry, but the GP is correct, the conclusion of the line was "and your chicks for free".
If they break DNS, we'll just move to a shadow system, whether based on hosts or just another flavor of DNS.
Where's our Communist Manifesto installment, Mr. Fulldiaper?
While service members take a generally libertarian view of what people are getting up to in private, the actual business of being in a military unit is surprisingly sex-free. The co-ed nature of line units is a policy decision foisted by Progressives.
There is a distinction to be drawn between racial integration, which makes massive sense, and co-ed units, which add zero (0) combat value to units.
If you took a truly anonymous survey of our military, I predict you'd find a plurality that, while freely admitting that they serve with some excellent ladies (I know I did) would still taper off their participation to a minimum. Because you Don't. Win. Wars. With. Social. Engineering.
Then again, our contemporary policy doesn't seem to be about winning wars. So keep the ladies around, I guess.
You never saw me advocate torture.
Nor did I.
Ye nattering nabobs
Who'd prefer cleanshaven
Java refactoring jobs
I stated before that GWB would have eventually signed off on the abolition of DADT in the military.
I stand in admiration of your capacity to Make Stuff Up, then treat your own utterances as received wisdom, e.g. "Obama is a conservative President".
You are Teh Man.
Meanwhile, where is the next installment of Karl's Folly?